• Super Maintenance

    Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates.

    Starting January 9th, site maintenance is ongoing until further notice, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into.

    We apologize for the inconvenience.

  • X/Twitter

    Due to recent news involving X, formerly Twitter and its owner, the staff of SuperHeroHype have decided it would be best to no longer allow links on the board. Starting January 31st, users will no longer be able to post direct links to X on this site, however screenshots will still be allowed as long as they follow Hype rules and guidelines.

    We apologize for any inconvenience.

Cursing toddler... cops call him a future thug

Teelie

Jeff
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
24,810
Reaction score
8,370
Points
118
Some cops are defending their claims a toddler is a future thug... because he's been taught to curse. :doh:

I underlined two parts in this that show just how ridiculous this is. First, the video depicts nothing illegal by their own admission. Second, they turned the video over to child welfare agents because the kid was cursing... I guess.

While I think it's funny it's also tragic that mere language is enough to enduce a "this is a future criminal" language out of the cops mouths.

This does bring up a question though, why is it children are discouraged from using language like this when it's clear they'll be hearing it all their lives (and I don't mean solely the racial slurs)?

I know there's several formalities of language from the crudest stuff you'd get infracted for here all the way to the dry, stiff language used in official and important discussions that take place in court rooms and the like.

Why not teach children then difference in appropriateness of using certain words in appropriate conversation instead of forbidding (and thus enticing) them with a list of "bad" words?

It's not like anyone is going to just stop using these words because they've been deemed "naughty."

The diapered child is bombarded with obscenities and racial slurs by the adults around him.

The African-American toddler knocks down a chair and gives nearly as good as he gets, responding to some of the comments with an upraised middle finger and telling one of the adults at one point, "Shut up, *****." The adults laugh and prompt him to repeat other crudities.

Just another day on the Internet -- until the police union in Omaha, Nebraska, posted the clip on its website to highlight what it called the "cycle of violence and thuggery" the community faces.

Now, the Omaha Police Officers' Association is under fire from the city's police chief, the ACLU and at least one community leader. They say the move needlessly antagonizes the city's minority communities, who make up about a quarter of Omaha's 409,000 residents.

Sgt. John Wells, the union's president, said the video was "disturbing" and "offensive."

"The focus here isn't on any particular ethnic group. The focus here is on the troubling behavior towards this child," Wells said. "This behavior is going to potentially lead this child down a path that is completely unhealthy."

On the website where the video is hosted, the union said the clip came from "a local thug's public Facebook page."

"We here at OmahaPOA.com viewed the video and we knew that despite the fact that it is sickening, heartbreaking footage, we have an obligation to share it to continue to educate the law abiding public about the terrible cycle of violence and thuggery that some young innocent children find themselves helplessly trapped in," the police union wrote in a post accompanying the video.

"Now while we didn't see anything in this video that is blatantly 'illegal,' we sure did see a lot that is flat out immoral and completely unhealthy for this little child from a healthy upbringing standpoint," it added.

Wells said one of the adults mentions a local street gang in the video.

"That is why when we talk about the culture, the criminal culture, that this is to try to break the cycle and deal with the culture of violence and the culture of gang activity," he said.

But in a city where police officers' treatment of minorities led to lawsuits, criminal charges against two officers and the firings and reassignments of several others in the past year, critics say the video is poking at raw wounds. Willie Hamilton, president of the community activist group Black Men United, said the union "crossed a line by doing this."

"For them to take a video out of context -- a 2-year-old who doesn't have the brain capacity to know what's going on -- and to say that this child, because two adults acted inappropriately, is going to end up in a life of crime is totally inappropriate," Hamilton said.

And the American Civil Liberties Union of Nebraska, which filed an excessive-force suit against the Omaha Police Department on behalf of an African-American family on Monday, said the union's use of "racially charged language" was "very disconcerting."

"Officers should be working to build a culture where anyone feels comfortable calling law enforcement," ACLU of Nebraska Executive Director Becki Brenner said in a written statement. "The manner in which the Officers Association has discussed this incident has done nothing but further erode community trust and reinforce the need for independent oversight, trainings, and other reforms."

Police Chief Todd Schmaderer tried to distance his agency from the controversy in a statement issued Tuesday, saying that the union's website and Facebook page are separate from those of the Omaha Police Department and that he has little authority over the public statements of union members.

"With that background and understanding, I want to make it explicit and clear that the views expressed on the OPOA Facebook page do not necessarily reflect the official stance of the Omaha Police Department," Schmaderer said. "I strongly disagree with any postings that may cause a divide in our community or an obstacle to police community relations."

Hamilton said the statement was too little, too late. Schmaderer was speaking out only "because this thing is on the Internet and went viral," he said.

"What do you think it's going to do about the trust level? You think we're going to call you and tell you anything? No. All this is doing is highlighting that."

Wells said
union members have turned the video over to the department's child victim unit, which will work with child-welfare agencies to investigate the circumstances. He said the organization "didn't think we'd get this big of a reaction."

"Hopefully, the impact is, it gives law-abiding citizens what law enforcement deals with on a daily basis, and it sort of throws back the blinders that these type of problems are going on," he said. "And we can have a very frank and open discussion on how to tackle these issues and come up with solutions."
CNN
 
Yeah, naughty words. Got to watch out for those...

I've always thought the concept itself was stupid.
 
I'm not going to lie, when toddlers curse, it's hilarious.
 
He better be put on the no fly list like those other kids who have similar names to potential threats with no evidence.
 
Some cops are defending their claims a toddler is a future thug... because he's been taught to curse.

I underlined two parts in this that show just how ridiculous this is. First, the video depicts nothing illegal by their own admission. Second, they turned the video over to child welfare agents because the kid was cursing... I guess.

LOL...watching the video, and reading the report from CNN, i don't think the cop made that statement solely because the toddler said a few bad words, but rather because the environment the child was in,the way that the apparent adults in that video treated that toddler-one was apparently a gang member. and i'm guessing, that's why they called in the child well fare...

The whole thing reeks like child abuse to me.
 
LOL...watching the video, and reading the report from CNN, i don't think the cop made that statement solely because the toddler said a few bad words, but rather because the environment the child was in,the way that the apparent adults in that video treated that toddler-one was apparently a gang member. and i'm guessing, that's why they called in the child well fare... The whole thing reeks like child abuse to me.
Agreed. None of that was appropriate for a toddler, but I do agree posting this about a 2-year old who had no idea what he was doing or saying is probably taking things a bit too far. There may have a been a better way to express this, and it might have been more prudent to talk directly to the child's parents then post this on the world wide web.

This does bring up a question though, why is it children are discouraged from using language like this when it's clear they'll be hearing it all their lives (and I don't mean solely the racial slurs)?

Why not teach children then difference in appropriateness of using certain words in appropriate conversation instead of forbidding (and thus enticing) them with a list of "bad" words?

It's not like anyone is going to just stop using these words because they've been deemed "naughty."
I believe children are discouraged from speaking that way because curse words are not generally considered polite conversation. The fact they will hear those words all their lives is no reason for them to use them when they are young, and in fact when they are young is the time to teach them that curse words are not polite.

Also, when children are still considered "children", it is my belief they have not earned the right to curse. I'm sure that sounds strange, but in my view cursing is an adult activity. I can't really explain this in anyway that might make sense, but imagine a 16 year-old cursing out a grown man of 30. It just comes off like some young punk barely out of diapers who needs to be socked or slapped. Unfortunately the 30 year-old would go to jail for doing that...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"