Dakota 'Rape' Film hits Sundance

StorminNorman

Avenger
Joined
Sep 26, 2005
Messages
30,513
Reaction score
2
Points
33
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,240618,00.html


Dakota Fanning 'Rape' Film Heads to Sundance

Tuesday , January 02, 2007

By Roger Friedman

Dakota Fanning ‘Rape' Film to Sundance | Pavarotti Recently Hospitalized in NYC | 'Indiana Jones 4': Here We Go Again | James Bond: The World Is Just Enough

Dakota Fanning 'Rape' Film to Sundance

Maybe the most controversial film heading to this month's Sundance Film Festival concerns the rape of a 12-year-old girl while Elvis Presley is heard singing in the background.

"HoundDog," written and directed by Deborah Kampmeier, is already getting more advance attention than "Chapter 27," the film about Mark David Chapman murdering John Lennon.

That's because the character played by 12-year-old actress Dakota Fanning, who made her mark six years ago in "I Am Sam," is raped onscreen.

Kampmeier doesn't show the actual rape, but it's quite clear, from sources who've seen the film, that as scripted and directed, the scenes in question are going to cause as big if not bigger uproar than when Brooke Shields played a pre-pubescent prostitute in Louis Malle's classic "Atlantic City."

In a terrific piece in the new Premiere magazine, Fanning's agent, Cindy Osbrink, tells writer Henry Cabot Beck: "I've been working with Dakota since she was five, and this is something we haven't seen her do. Something that really challenged her talent. 'HoundDog' was one of the best experiences of her life, a story that needs to be told, and she tells it with her soul as no one else can."

Apparently there are already a number of Web sites protesting this film, and lots of comments on the Internet Movie Data Base lamenting the potential exploitation of Fanning.

What could do the movie in, though, is the soundtrack of Elvis Presley records. It's unclear whether the Presley estate will approve the licensing of the ultimate pop idol's voice as the film's backdrop, or even if the writers of the song "Hound Dog" — Jerry Leiber and Mike Stoller —won't do something to keep their famous composition out of it.

No producers are credited yet for "HoundDog," by the way, but the Premiere article does cite Jean Gatien as having raised funds and lists her as "daughter of New York club owner Peter Gatien."

For the record, Peter Gatien — implicated in the famous nightclub murder of Angel Melendez that was depicted in the Macaulay Culkin movie "Party Monster"— was deported to Canada in 2003. He'd pled guilty in 1999 to not paying $1.9 million in taxes and spent 60 days in jail, after he was acquitted of federal drug charges in 1996.

His many New York clubs, like Limelight and the Tunnel, were the scenes of constant drug raids during their heyday.
 
this movie will probably do well.. but i personally find it quite sick...although acting comes with these types of jobs all the time if it wasn't dakota fanning would it be getting the same response?..i think it could be being blown out of proportion.

mysterious skin a story of child abuse didn't get this much attention
 
What's the big deal? It's a story of a 12-year-old getting raped. Which does happen in real life BTW. The director has already made clear that we don't see anything so whats the big deal?!
 
uh...maybe certain things shouldnt be portrayed.
 
Remember "A Time to Kill", the start of that movie was a small girl being raped, beaten and hung. The movie is only getting this much attention because Dakota Fanning is in the role
 
lol, I hate when people just copy/paste the entire article, drives me insane.
'Cause you have the thread title:

"Dakota rape film hits Sundance"


then, you click on it and it says:

Dakota Fanning 'Rape' Film Heads to Sundance

Tuesday , January 02, 2007

By Roger Friedman

Dakota Fanning ‘Rape' Film to Sundance | Pavarotti Recently Hospitalized in NYC | 'Indiana Jones 4': Here We Go Again | James Bond: The World Is Just Enough

Dakota Fanning 'Rape' Film to Sundance

Maybe the most controversial film heading to this month's Sundance Film Festival concerns the rape of a 12-year-old girl while Elvis Presley is heard singing in the background.



It's like you're trying to brainwash us.:cmad:
 
ROBOCOP CPU001 said:
this movie will probably do well.. but i personally find it quite sick...although acting comes with these types of jobs all the time if it wasn't dakota fanning would it be getting the same response?..i think it could be being blown out of proportion.

mysterious skin a story of child abuse didn't get this much attention

but mysterious skin wasn't that much about child abuse, it was more about an unusual form of love, with a little bit of abuse thrown in, also a fantastic film while i'm talkin bout it
 
Didnt the same thing happen in A time to kill. I havent seen that movie in years, but I think it was pretty graphic, wasnt it?
 
Cyrusbales said:
but mysterious skin wasn't that much about child abuse, it was more about an unusual form of love, with a little bit of abuse thrown in, also a fantastic film while i'm talkin bout it

uh ...no, it was about child abuse and how each character dealt with the situation as manifested by their life choices.
 
vibeke_T said:
uh ...no, it was about child abuse and how each character dealt with the situation as manifested by their life choices.

the fact that it's child abuse has nothing to do with it, it's about stating that children are more than children etc, whilst some may be 'abusable', others are capable of more mature love, it disintergrating the age barriers etc.
 
Cyrusbales said:
the fact that it's child abuse has nothing to do with it, it's about stating that children are more than children etc, whilst some may be 'abusable', others are capable of more mature love, it disintergrating the age barriers etc.


it has EVERYTHING to do with it...one thinks he's been abducted by aliens and the other one is a hooker -- how is that effing normal?
 
vibeke_T said:
it has EVERYTHING to do with it...one thinks he's been abducted by aliens and the other one is a hooker -- how is that effing normal?

it's commenting on what is normal, normal is subjective. It's not saying this is good or bad, it's saying this is something that can and does happen.
 
Cyrusbales said:
it's commenting on what is normal, normal is subjective. It's not saying this is good or bad, it's saying this is something that can and does happen.


Normal is NOT subjective...people pretend it is. Also, they are clearly damaged by what occurred...aliens clearly didn't abduct the boy...and the other boy thinks he was special and loved by the coach that took sexual advantage of him -- that is not normal its called Stockholm Syndrome. Thanks. Don't try to justify it.
 
vibeke_T said:
Normal is NOT subjective...people pretend it is. Also, they are clearly damaged by what occurred...aliens clearly didn't abduct the boy...and the other boy thinks he was special and loved by the coach that took sexual advantage of him -- that is not normal its called Stockholm Syndrome. Thanks. Don't try to justify it.

Is it not better to have loved and lost, than to have never loved at all? Considering the film thinks outside the box, the audience should do to. If he feels he was loved, isn't that what matters? Reality is what we make it. It's quite a common point in post-modernist filmmaking, and George Araki is a huge advocate of this in interveiws etc.
 
Cyrusbales said:
Is it not better to have loved and lost, than to have never loved at all? Considering the film thinks outside the box, the audience should do to. If he feels he was loved, isn't that what matters? Reality is what we make it. It's quite a common point in post-modernist filmmaking, and George Araki is a huge advocate of this in interveiws etc.


The problem is the flawed viewpoint...this will only become fuel for pedo-activists...this society is sick.
 
Catman said:
What's the big deal? It's a story of a 12-year-old getting raped. Which does happen in real life BTW. The director has already made clear that we don't see anything so whats the big deal?!

Im trying to figure that out myself. It happens in real life more then people might think. And it doesnt happen on screen. Seems like people are trying to make it more controvertial than it really is.


Triadkd said:
Didnt the same thing happen in A time to kill. I havent seen that movie in years, but I think it was pretty graphic, wasnt it?

The scene was at the beginning an it cut in an out. They never showed it, just the screaming and such. But it does get points for making you visualize it with out it actully being seen on the screen.
 
vibeke_T said:
The problem is the flawed viewpoint...this will only become fuel for pedo-activists...this society is sick.

that's exactly what the film is against, it's just the film is seen differently by some audiences, which is why it had a limited release even though it of exceptional quality
 
Cyrusbales said:
that's exactly what the film is against, it's just the film is seen differently by some audiences, which is why it had a limited release even though it of exceptional quality


what are you talking about...you just changed your point of view twice.
 
vibeke_T said:
what are you talking about...you just changed your point of view twice.

not really, i said it wasn't about abuse and that it was all about one construction of ones own reality. Whilst it does have abusive elements, that is not what the film is about, however not all audiences appretiate this, and think it's pedo-abuse, which is why the limited release....
 
TOO SOON!


..Yeah, right. It's a film, get over it or don't watch it.
 
Dakota's really pulling for that Oscar.:o
 
probably not going to watch it...big hoopla about a white girl
 
Cyrusbales said:
but mysterious skin wasn't that much about child abuse, it was more about an unusual form of love, with a little bit of abuse thrown in, also a fantastic film while i'm talkin bout it




actually dude i beg to differ..

Mysterious skin showed the effect of child abuse on its to main charactors..where as one charactor embraced and enjoyed what happend to him..another repressed his experiance..thinking he was abducted by aliens...

the movie is about how the abuse effected them..where as i guess hound dog will probably do the same..
 
Is the film about the rape of a 12 year-old girl, or is that just what the media have simply chosen to focus on to stir up controversy? To say nothing of the fact that the article even states that the rape won't even be shown in any kind of detail, it's just directed in such a way as to force the audience to use their imagination. I do agree that the major point of contention is the fact that Dakota Fanning has been a media darling among child stars in recent years. It's ironic, as her attraction has always been that she seems to be more mature than her age would imply, going all the way back to I Am Sam. People liked that she didn't act like how most would expect a child to act at her age.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
201,153
Messages
21,907,325
Members
45,704
Latest member
BMD
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"