Loki882
Avenger
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2013
- Messages
- 21,276
- Reaction score
- 147
- Points
- 48
^ I think Daredevil comes close to the line, so, in that sense, I agree with him. But I also don't think he'd cross that line. And, let's face it, he has a ton of bad days and he's not the Punisher, so it's demonstrably false. But as hyperbole, I'm cool with the statement.
The two characters actually work well as opposite sides of a coin. Daredevil obviously works in violent shades of gray, but he has faith in the justice system and the capacity to forgive and help his enemies. Punisher rejects the justice system and rejects forgiveness and compassion. He sinks to the villain's level and relishes in it. The contrast works well.
I go back and forth on this. On the one hand, I agree completely. It'll always be imperfect and I don't think the comics have always handled ti well. On the other hand, the comics have non-visual clues they can use. Unless we can constantly hear Matt's thoughts being narrated, there's no other good way to reflect the radar sense. Just showing him reacting doesn't let the audience imagine the radar sense as it actually is, it lets the audience get deluded into thinking he can see normally. At least some visual approximation (for what I'd submit is not a visual thing at all) gives the audience something their brains can comprehend.
I don't really agree that the Punisher "relishes" what he does. Maybe Ennis's Punisher does, but not every version is like that. A lot of times he's depicted as not really enjoying what he does. He does it because he sees it as a necessary evil. "The law" often fails to punish terrible people who are guilty as sin, be it due to technicalities, corruption, plain-old incompetence, etc, so someone else has to. He's a soldier fighting a war, at least in his own mind. As for his methods, it's like Batman's whole "turn fear against those who prey on the fearful" philosophy taken to it's most extreme.