MessiahDecoy123
Psychological Anarchist
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2008
- Messages
- 25,499
- Reaction score
- 4,465
- Points
- 103
I'm curious regarding how many critically acclaimed graphic novel Cronenberg has read if any.
I'm curious regarding how many critically acclaimed graphic novel Cronenberg has read if any.
david cronenberg is one of my all time favorite directors. the dude is a brilliant film maker. his horror films from the early 70's are unmatched in their genre. even his failures as a film maker can be respected for their ambitious high concepts and attempts to push boundaries.
i agree with his opinion that TDKR was boring. i also agree that its stupid for people to consider TDKR as supreme cinema art. i disagree with his sweeping generalization about comic books. and im sure given the opportunity, his opinion on that could easily be reversed.
nothing he's said changes my respect and praise of him as a film maker.
ha, cronenberg has zero desire to direct 200 million dollar blockbusters.
you know whats more offensive than anything cronenberg said? yer wish for someone to DIE just because they think comic books are kids fare. you can **** off with that bull****.
who the hell is this Cronenberg *****e?
if it wasn't for him bad mouthing TDKR i wouldn't have heard of him. and it's pretty rich of him to stay trash like that considering he cast that Twilight tool in his new movie.
i think his comment about comic books were obviously in regards to superhero comics, which a history of violence is not.
Vertigo's titles aren't any different, in essence.
Animal Man, The Swamp Thing, Doom Patrol, Hellblazer, Sandman, V for Vendetta, Shade, Black Orchid, etc are basically 'darker' comic book characters without masks and capes. Incidentally, several of these characters have been found in the DCU interacting with the likes of Batman or Superman, and are placed in similar situations.
A History of Violence remains a graphic novel from DC. It's apart of the genre. No matter how one tries to justify it, he directed a DC property.
i understand all that. my point is, people are calling him a hypocrite for having his opinion on comics while having directed a comic book movie. my point is, his comments seem directed not so much at comics in general, but rather SUPERHERO comics in general. A History of Violence is not a superhero comic.