Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]469719[/split]
None of that points to anything. I actually read through all of that looking for something viable btw
Has nothing to do with additional filming. Singer stated the future segments in 2023 amount to 30 minutes worth of storytelling in the film.
I Agree.I don't know what this does or doesn't mean for the OT cast going forward, but I DO believe there is more going on here than we know. Even if that mid-credits rumor is true, that means there is still some element of time travel involved. Maybe Apocalypse takes his horsemen from different times but chooses to plant his major scheme in the past for some reason. I want to stress: We really have no idea what is happening at this point.
Let's all try to relax and enjoy the ride. In Bryan Singer, I trust.t:
Why, exactly, is it so disappointing that they might not be adapting Age of Apocalypse and might instead be adapting a story that would facilitate using the FC cast?
We're already disappointed over a film that was just announced and won't start filming for at least another year. Neat.
I still don't get the logic that an X-Force, or any other X-Film for that matter, has to be set in the future after X-Men: Apocalypse. Am I missing something that says no stories can be told in the past or with an expanded cast of characters there?
I don't see the correlation.
If X-MEN: APOCALYPSE doesn't feature the original cast, it makes sense, just as it would in a certain storyline if it did.
I can't bring myself to feel bad about this, because in all likelihood, if we don't see the Cyclops, Storm and Jean we know, then we're probably going to see a second "First Class" of young Cyclops, Jeans, Storm, Beast, etc in their first great test.
I wonder if Sinister and Apocalypse will have anything to do with Jean's evolution into Phoenix? That'd be a cool angle to use.
I still don't get the logic that an X-Force, or any other X-Film for that matter, has to be set in the future after X-Men: Apocalypse.
I thought Hoult, Lawrence, McAvoy and Fassbender were signed for three films?I'm curious as to what what Fox's plan is, as this is the last film everyone is signed for, as far as we know.
I thought Hoult, Lawrence, McAvoy and Fassbender were signed for three films?
I mean after X-Men: Apocalypse. Recasting the roles of Cyclops, Jean, and Storm is an interesting idea, but does Fox think there's a good chance of resigning the likes of Fassbender and McAvoy?
Now call me uneducated but what is the relevance in havingDid this happen in a comic series that I'm not familiar with?Magneto himself transform into Apocalypse?
I mean after X-Men: Apocalypse. Recasting the roles of Cyclops, Jean, and Storm is an interesting idea, but does Fox think there's a good chance of resigning the likes of Fassbender and McAvoy?
Now call me uneducated but what is the relevance in having [BLACKOUT]Magneto himself transform into Apocalypse?[/BLACKOUT] Did this happen in a comic series that I'm not familiar with?
My thoughts are more to do with the timeline.
If - and we don't know this for certain - DoFP ends up re-setting the timeline to create the [BLACKOUT]rumoured happy ending and farewell to the OT cast[/BLACKOUT], then how will Apocalypse's arrival in the past mess with that?