The Amazing Spider-Man Demand an EXTENDED CUT. Send an E-MAIL to Sony now!

Discussion in 'The Amazing Spider-Man Movies' started by Super-, Jul 5, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Page 1 of 4
  1. Super-

    Super- Registered

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2012
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    1) "Extended Cut" does NOT mean the same thing as "Director's Cut" so don't use that phrase in your replies.

    2) Extended Cuts only happen when the AUDIENCE demands it, not because the producers/directors already planned on releasing it before the theatrical version came out.

    Send an E-mail to sony Sony immediately, and demand the Extended Cut.

    I'm so angry right now because this movie is a ripoff (I'm talking about the theatrical version).

    Whatever happaned to the footage from the trailers showing Peter putting on a white-labcoat and getting ready to "play god" with Dr. Connors?
    Why would they cut that out when it was clearly meant to establish the growing chemistry between the characters?
    They were going to interact in the lab and possibly have fun with each other and we would've gotten to see them share a common interest. But then the actual movie comes out and we never see that part happen at all. Ripoff!

    Or what about the whole arc involving Connors feeling the need to turn against Peter personally: "If you want the truth, come and get it!".
    I was waiting for that dynamic to start in the movie, but it never came. Ripoff!

    Plus, the only comic-relief I remember from the movie were the physical gags when Peter was alone...Again, the trailers implied that there was going to be comic-relief that came from character-interaction (for example: Peter and Gwen poking fun at the fact that he's a wanted man, which would've been showing that Peter and Gwen were comfortable in their closure, while still knowing his secret) but that part never happened. Ripoff!

    No wonder this movie only has low 70s on Rottentomatoes. The trailers promised us an internally/emotionally epic storyline about Peter and the mystery of his parents, plus an actual dymanic relationship between Peter and Connors...and we got NONE of that from the Theatrical version. Just because we see Peter kind-of "accidentally" looking into the story about his parents, doesn't change the fact that it's not shown in the way the trailers made us think it would.

    Something needs to be done. Send an Email to Sony and demand the Extended Cut. I don't care if it's not attached to the first DVD/blu-ray that comes out, as long as we get the Extended Cut anyway. I'm not going to buy the "theatrical-only" version because it's NOT the version the trailers promised us. Demand the Extended Cut so that we can finally see the version that would've gotten high 80s (or even low 90s) on Rottentomatoes.
     
    #1 Super-, Jul 5, 2012
  2. Eddie Brock

    Eddie Brock Golden Domer

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2006
    Messages:
    25,154
    Likes Received:
    0
    Seriously?

    1. You already posted this rant in another thread.
    2. That other thread is specifically for this kind of thing.
    3. Your anger confuses me.
     
    #2 Eddie Brock, Jul 5, 2012
  3. Super-

    Super- Registered

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2012
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    What do you mean "seriously"? There's nothing joke-ish about anything I mentioned in my post.


    1.1. NOBODY responded to that. It was OVERLOOKED because people only click on the LATEST replies.

    1.2. For that exact reason, that "rant" is not there anymore. It's here now.


    2. No it's not. That other thread is just talking about saying how we feel about it WITHOUT bothering to do anything about it. This thread is telling people to TAKE ACTION, which that other thread is NOT.

    ..
     
    #3 Super-, Jul 5, 2012
    Last edited: Jul 5, 2012
  4. Jexx

    Jexx the Emerald Eagle

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2012
    Messages:
    1,659
    Likes Received:
    0
    dafuq is with you capitalizing certain words.
     
    #4 Jexx, Jul 5, 2012
  5. Eddie Brock

    Eddie Brock Golden Domer

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2006
    Messages:
    25,154
    Likes Received:
    0
    It was overlooked because you're being over-the-top.
     
    #5 Eddie Brock, Jul 5, 2012
  6. Eddie Brock

    Eddie Brock Golden Domer

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2006
    Messages:
    25,154
    Likes Received:
    0
    Emphasis, methinks.
     
    #6 Eddie Brock, Jul 5, 2012
  7. Troy_Parker

    Troy_Parker Registered

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2007
    Messages:
    11,236
    Likes Received:
    2
    Time to say this...

    Please stop making pointless threads. It's beyond a joke now. Within the past 2, 3 days, so many stupid threads have been made, threads that aren't even necessary. Threads that could be merged with other threads. There's like a 100 review threads, 50 or so on deleted scenes/things that were removed, etc.

    *numbers may be exaggerated :p
     
    #7 Troy_Parker, Jul 5, 2012
  8. Illustrious Var

    Illustrious Var Mentally Unstable

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2011
    Messages:
    140
    Likes Received:
    0
    Does it really matter? Enjoy the movie for what it is.

    If they decide to release some sort of extended cut later on it'll be their decision, we don't need another Mass Effect 3 running around.
     
    #8 Illustrious Var, Jul 5, 2012
  9. Iron_Burger

    Iron_Burger Registered

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2009
    Messages:
    56
    Likes Received:
    0
    If anyone is gonna ask Sony for an extended cut, ask nicely please.

    It would be great if the OP included an address we could e-mail or write a letter to. As well as write a template for what we should nicely ask for. Maybe set up a petition to sign.

    Otherwise this call to action is worthless.
     
    #9 Iron_Burger, Jul 5, 2012
  10. Iron_Burger

    Iron_Burger Registered

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2009
    Messages:
    56
    Likes Received:
    0
    I must say I do 100% agree that any talk of Peter having had genetic tampering should not be in the movie, even in an Extended Cut.
     
    #10 Iron_Burger, Jul 5, 2012
  11. forgot10

    forgot10 Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2012
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    0
    Oh noes the movie is in the 70's on Rotten Tomatoes, means it sucks. Guess all the enjoyment I got out of it was not the way I was supposed to feel.
     
    #11 forgot10, Jul 5, 2012
  12. JerseyJoker

    JerseyJoker Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2004
    Messages:
    1,853
    Likes Received:
    0
    Boooooooooooring.
     
    #12 JerseyJoker, Jul 5, 2012
  13. Liam_H

    Liam_H Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2011
    Messages:
    8,526
    Likes Received:
    1
    QFT. Thank You. So many of them could've just been in the general one.
     
    #13 Liam_H, Jul 6, 2012
  14. Super-

    Super- Registered

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2012
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    Write those E-mails, people. We can do this.
     
    #14 Super-, Jul 6, 2012
  15. VenomSpawn

    VenomSpawn WAAAAAAAAA

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2011
    Messages:
    6,223
    Likes Received:
    0
    Marc Webb already said there are around 4 deleted scenes that will be on the DVD/Blu-Ray release, do we really need an Extended Cut?
     
    #15 VenomSpawn, Jul 6, 2012
  16. Steve Sanders

    Steve Sanders Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2012
    Messages:
    83
    Likes Received:
    0
    nobody should ever believe anything rotton tomatoes says,they're a joke and dont know jack ****e.Oh and I'll send an email to them and demand that as long as you send one and demand they dont kill off gwen stacy in the next film.you should be just as much concerned about that especially since they alreadu killed George.

    btw,you said send an email.we'll can you at least supply the email address? people myself included,are not going to go hunt for it.you want people to do this,then you need to supply us with that email.Like i said,I'll do it as long as you supply it for us and you promise to email them as well not to kill off gwen.
     
    #16 Steve Sanders, Jul 6, 2012
    Last edited: Jul 6, 2012
  17. roach

    roach I am the night

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2002
    Messages:
    46,721
    Likes Received:
    29
    be careful what you ask for...you may get the David Banner/Hulk origin
     
    #17 roach, Jul 6, 2012
  18. <(o_o)>

    <(o_o)> Evangeline Is My Hero!

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2004
    Messages:
    5,374
    Likes Received:
    16
    Didn't work with Spider-Man 3.:( The Amazing Spider-Man is already over 2 hours long, so how much longer do you want it to be?
     
    #18 <(o_o)>, Jul 6, 2012
  19. chaseter

    chaseter Esteemed Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2006
    Messages:
    45,868
    Likes Received:
    51
    This is what happens when you put your trust in Sony...the same people that ruined SM3 and SM4...but somehow were going to make up for it in ASM.........................
     
    #19 chaseter, Jul 6, 2012
  20. jacobed

    jacobed Registered

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Messages:
    9,646
    Likes Received:
    2
    I don't think this movie needed one. Never once did I think oh this movie could have used another scene or 2. I thought all the characters that needed to be fleshed out were fleshed out and that it flowed at a good pace. They are called deleted scenes for a reason, they need to stay that way.
     
    #20 jacobed, Jul 6, 2012
  21. Super-

    Super- Registered

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2012
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    Write those E-mails people. We can do this.
     
    #21 Super-, Jul 8, 2012
  22. PSYLENTGuardian

    PSYLENTGuardian El Pollos Hermano

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2010
    Messages:
    2,531
    Likes Received:
    2
    This thread is still open?
     
    #22 PSYLENTGuardian, Jul 8, 2012
  23. Tanin

    Tanin Vladeck

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2004
    Messages:
    5,632
    Likes Received:
    14
    I wrote up a big long email explaining what I thought needed to be done to make the movie better.

    What department at Sony handles this kind of thing as they do not have a 'crybaby' department? I mean I found out that the email to Sir Howard Stringer was [email protected] until it was disabled after another email campaign like this one annoyed them. Can you please give me his new one.
     
    #23 Tanin, Jul 8, 2012
  24. Radioactive

    Radioactive Registered

    Joined:
    May 4, 2012
    Messages:
    465
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm starting to think this thread is like a circle. Pointless.
     
    #24 Radioactive, Jul 8, 2012
  25. FVD

    FVD Launder the Conscience

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2002
    Messages:
    2,047
    Likes Received:
    29
    Thank you for today's entertainment lol! Close this thread!! :p
     
    #25 FVD, Jul 8, 2012
Page 1 of 4
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn More...
    Dismiss Notice
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn More...
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"