The Squirrel
Le Rongeur
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2003
- Messages
- 17,781
- Reaction score
- 19
- Points
- 58
Yeah, they are pretty much borderline terrorists.
Yeah, they are pretty much borderline terrorists.
Apple, in this EULA, is claiming a right not just to its software, but to its softwares output. Its akin to Microsoft trying to restrict what people can do with Word documents, or Adobe declaring that if you use Photoshop to export a JPEG, you cant freely sell it to Getty. As far as I know, in the consumer software industry, this practice is unprecedented.
The nightmare scenario under this agreement? You create a great work of staggering literary genius that you think you can sell for 5 or 10 bucks per copy. You craft it carefully in iBooks Author. You submit it to Apple. They reject it.
Under this license agreement, you are out of luck. They wont sell it, and you cant legally sell it elsewhere. You can give it away, but you cant sell it. Updated to add: By it, I am referring to the book, not the content. The program allows you to export your work as plain text, with all formatting stripped. So you do have the option to take the formatting work you did in iBooks Author, throw it away, and start over. That is a devastating potential limitation for an author/publisher. Outputting as PDF would preserve the formatting, but again the license would appear to prohibit you from selling that work, because it was generated by iBooks Author.
I'm not a hater, I do have to use Apple in my work. But I get annoyed as hell with them. Get way more praise and credit than they deserve.
*Cue deafening applause around the world*After The Dark Knight Rises, I am done with Warner stuff. I am not giving them a dime for their Superman movie, I hope it tanks. No trades, nothing. Same goes with Marvel comics and its movies, I am most likely skipping Avengers.
I am mainly trying to reconcile books, since there is actual information that I need to digest and use. Quite a few books are from HarperCollins.
It might not make much of a difference, but every little helps.
![]()
If this is between Hollywood vs Silicon Valley, I am going with Silicon Valley. They actually produce stuff of more utility towards the world. And frankly a greater enabler and barrier breaker to artist upstarts.
Apple's mind-bogglingly greedy and evil license agreement
I accused Jobs of being technofascist, was mocked. This is the type of culture he fostered. The audacity of this is mind boggling, considering their OS is a derivative of UNIX.
So basically Hollywood thought they were bribing him. Which is also illegal