MagnarTheGreat
Web Ninja
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2011
- Messages
- 37,387
- Reaction score
- 21,065
- Points
- 103
Roberts has never been apolitical, in fact, he's one of the most blatantly partisan Chief Justices in our history. The thing is, he's SMART. He knows that the flavor-of-the-month culture war nonsense the national party is running with is ultimately irrelevant. So when he sees the tide is turning, he'll side with the liberals (such as in Obergfell) and claim to be impartial to fend off calls for court reform.Once again we know the Supreme Court is really, truly not "apolitical" as Roberts keeps claiming. Not when they allow Republicans to blatantly and openly supress voters.
United States Constitution said:The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.
Guess we know who paid off the gambling debts....
There were no noted dissents from other justices.