- Joined
- Dec 27, 2012
- Messages
- 18,440
- Reaction score
- 23,574
- Points
- 103
Well we're good and properly ****ed. Pancreatic cancer is one of the deadliest forms of cancer and its quick too. Shes not going to make it until January 2021. I doubt she'll even make it until next summer.
And one turtle.There's lots of vultures circling just waiting for her to die.
And one turtle.
Easy there. Yeah, pancreatic cancer is the really bad but they she's beaten this one too. The doctors didn't find any evidence of cancer after her treatment. The news was good.
My aunt died of it.I'd expect them to say that. They arent going to tell the public that the 86 year old Justice that our hopes are riding on is terminal. Not with the way the GOP and MAGAts are behaving.
I've seen 3 people die from pancreatic cancer. A friends father, and two relatives. None of them lasted a year after discovery. That's anecdotal, but what isnt anecdotal is it has an 80% kill rate, and spreads quickly from the pancreas to other body systems because the pancreas has direct access to the bloodstream.
I'd expect them to say that. They arent going to tell the public that the 86 year old Justice that our hopes are riding on is terminal. Not with the way the GOP and MAGAts are behaving.
I've seen 3 people die from pancreatic cancer. A friends father, and two relatives. None of them lasted a year after discovery. That's anecdotal, but what isnt anecdotal is it has an 80% kill rate, and spreads quickly from the pancreas to other body systems because the pancreas has direct access to the bloodstream.
Ms. Ramirez’s story would seem far less damaging to Mr. Kavanaugh’s reputation than those of Dr. Ford, who claimed that he pinned her to a bed, groped her and tried to remove her clothes while covering her mouth.
But while we found Dr. Ford’s allegations credible during a 10-month investigation, Ms. Ramirez’s story could be more fully corroborated. During his Senate testimony, Mr. Kavanaugh said that if the incident Ms. Ramirez described had occurred, it would have been “the talk of campus.” Our reporting suggests that it was.
At least seven people, including Ms. Ramirez’s mother, heard about the Yale incident long before Mr. Kavanaugh was a federal judge. Two of those people were classmates who learned of it just days after the party occurred, suggesting that it was discussed among students at the time.
We also uncovered a previously unreported story about Mr. Kavanaugh in his freshman year that echoes Ms. Ramirez’s allegation. A classmate, Max Stier, saw Mr. Kavanaugh with his pants down at a different drunken dorm party, where friends pushed his ***** into the hand of a female student. Mr. Stier, who runs a nonprofit organization in Washington, notified senators and the F.B.I. about this account, but the F.B.I. did not investigate and Mr. Stier has declined to discuss it publicly. (We corroborated the story with two officials who have communicated with Mr. Stier.)
Ms. Ramirez’s legal team gave the F.B.I. a list of at least 25 individuals who may have had corroborating evidence. But the bureau — in its supplemental background investigation — interviewed none of them, though we learned many of these potential witnesses tried in vain to reach the F.B.I. on their own.
Two F.B.I. agents interviewed Ms. Ramirez, telling her that they found her “credible.” But the Republican-controlled Senate had imposed strict limits on the investigation. “‘We have to wait to get authorization to do anything else,’” Bill Pittard, one of Ms. Ramirez’s lawyers, recalled the agents saying. “It was almost a little apologetic.”
Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island and member of the Judiciary Committee, later said, “I would view the Ramirez allegations as not having been even remotely investigated.” Other Democrats agreed.
Ultimately, Senator Charles E. Grassley, Republican of Iowa and chairman of the Judiciary Committee, concluded, “There is no corroboration of the allegations made by Dr. Ford or Ms. Ramirez.” Mr. Kavanaugh was confirmed on Oct. 6, 2018, by a vote of 50-48, the closest vote for a Supreme Court justice in more than 130 years.
"It would be a mistake to dismiss this as a bad case of sour grapes. This is not just a left-wing obsession with one man. It's part of a deliberate effort to attack judicial independence," he said.