Do you have good friends who CAN be trusted and a woman who's NOT out to destroy you?

Thank god for you, Spoons. :up:
 
The trust I put in the few people I can truly call friends is still guarded. Though I am a fiercely loyal friend, I still know that humans are humans and that we call can and will make mistakes. I try and drop my guard with my wife, but women are inherently evil by nature so I have to protect my neck.










... that last part is a joke btw... don't get all feminosity up in here.
 
Some people think they're nice...

Some people think they're nasty...

But if you really want to know just ask me...

I say they're nicety.
 
Yes I do.... 6 very good friends, two are women.
 
I have no friends to trust and I live with a female cat that is out to destroy me.
 
No, we pretty much stab each other in the back at every turn. Plus I knocked up this girl and offered to help her with the pregnancy. Unfortunately the coathanger was rusty and she got tetanus. Now her jaw is frozen in place and she's out to kill me.
 
I do have good friends that can be trusted but i don't know if they should trust me .
 
The trust I put in the few people I can truly call friends is still guarded. Though I am a fiercely loyal friend, I still know that humans are humans and that we call can and will make mistakes. I try and drop my guard with my wife, but women are inherently evil by nature so I have to protect my neck.
[large space]
... that last part is a joke btw... don't get all feminosity up in here.

I agree completely with this post. You can't blame a snake for biting you, when you let your guard down to pet it. It may be a "pet" but it's still, by nature, a snake.

Humans don't have fangs or venom physically, but the deadliest sting can often be in learning not to be too trusting.

That's not to say you should clam up and be anti-social. But the best way to live without being hurt is to draw a figurative circle around yourself, and keep most people at a very far distance.

Girlfriends, boyfriends, husbands and wives should only get visitation rights into your circle. Even they should not be in for too long.

"But Silverstein, what the hell? I've known my [insert relationship] for years, and I trust them. Why should I keep them at a distance?"

Well, I never said how "individual" you have to be. You can let them into some things, but never get too comfortable.

I believe, even Lil Wayne said that...
 
Girlfriends, boyfriends, husbands and wives should only get visitation rights into your circle. Even they should not be in for too long.
Isn't that how cheating starts sometimes?
 
The trust I put in the few people I can truly call friends is still guarded. Though I am a fiercely loyal friend, I still know that humans are humans and that we call can and will make mistakes. I try and drop my guard with my wife, but women are inherently evil by nature so I have to protect my neck.










... that last part is a joke btw... don't get all feminosity up in here.
Let's be friends. :up:
 
Isn't that how cheating starts sometimes?

People that are going to cheat are like that the moment you met them. Anyone that says otherwise is just lying. They do something wrong and then try to blame you for it.

Because think about it: How is having sex with someone else going to solve the issues you have with your lover and them not letting their guard down around you?

Wouldn't doing that be a testament for the person's NEED to keep you at a distance?

If someone has a problem with you and what you do. Then they should break up with you. There is NEVER an excuse for cheating.

I love my girlfriend. I've been at parties that other girls attended, I've been drunk, they've been drunk. But nothing happens. Why? Because I don't want anyone else. And vice versa for her.


One of my close friends was dating this girl (the sister of another close friend), and she would say how she loved him and stuff, but all the while she would be going off with this other kid and going down on him. I didn't know any of them at the time, otherwise I would have kicked that kid's ass for my friend.
Anyways, he found out obviously and was pissed and they broke up and stuff. But now when I hear about it from her side, and the kid she cheated on him with....They say how my friend was a creep and how he cared more about his own situations.
She's the type that you don't have to try hard for, if I were single and desperate I could probably "win" her. (If she were to forgive me for all the times I mock her for cheating on my friend, but even then I think she probably doesn't care...) She flirts with everyone.

So that said, cheating is an attribute of character. She's obviously just like that. And the guy she cheated on my friend with has been rumoured to have cheated on her and vice versa. They are just low like that.

It's a choice not a response.
 
I have great friends, a great girl, and no evil chick in sight, go me!
 
People that are going to cheat are like that the moment you met them. Anyone that says otherwise is just lying. They do something wrong and then try to blame you for it.

It's not always that simple. Yes, some people don't want to work hard in a relationship, but if they were getting what they wanted/needed, most people would probably not resort to seeking it elsewhere.

Because think about it: How is having sex with someone else going to solve the issues you have with your lover and them not letting their guard down around you?

It depends on the issues you're having with them. If the issues is sex, it can solve that issue nicely.

One of my close friends was dating this girl (the sister of another close friend), and she would say how she loved him and stuff, but all the while she would be going off with this other kid and going down on him. I didn't know any of them at the time, otherwise I would have kicked that kid's ass for my friend.

So...you abhor people who are unfaithful, but have no problem with random violence? :)

So that said, cheating is an attribute of character.

Not always. It's not always as simple as "they're just low like that".

It's a choice not a response.

It can be both.
 
It's not always that simple. Yes, some people don't want to work hard in a relationship, but if they were getting what they wanted/needed, most people would probably not resort to seeking it elsewhere.

It depends on the issues you're having with them. If the issues is sex, it can solve that issue nicely.

So...you abhor people who are unfaithful, but have no problem with random violence? :)

Spoken like someone who has cheated before. And I gave you the vague version of the story to get the point across. I believe that violence is not a horrible thing and actually makes up much of the world around us naturally.

Would you call what spiders do to insects "non-violent" or cats and mice? Lions and gazelles? Violence is very much necessary a lot of the time. Even shaolin monks realize this.

So I would hope you're not being judgemental about my reaction to something you know very little about. The kid deserves a medium amount of pain directed at his face.


If the issue is sex, no it doesn't solve it nicely, because you're still -cheating-. Solving the problem would be to break up with the person and THEN get with someone else. Not "shop around" until you're satisfied, despite the dishonesty and heartache you're causing.

Seriously, bro, defending cheating means one of two things:

-Either you've done it and are defending yourself indirectly..
or
-You're just trying to sound "open minded" or something...

It's just wrong, there's no debate for it. I bet if I made a thread about how killing babies is wrong, someone would argue against it. *sigh*

Why can't we all just agree? Even in the obviously correct things to agree on.
 
The friends I can trust live far to the point where I can't just visit them. I would make new ones but to be honest I don't have the energy to make friends now.

And as far as women go...there aren't any trying to destroy me because, they just don't want anything to do with me.
 
Spoken like someone who has cheated before.

Nope. Never.

Does kissing a girl onstage for a role count?

If it doesn't, then nope...never.

And I gave you the vague version of the story to get the point across. I believe that violence is not a horrible thing and actually makes up much of the world around us naturally.

Stop me if this starts to make sense...

1. It is not ok to hug and kiss or physically pleasure someone when you desire them, or desire physical pleasure, because someone will be emotionally hurt.

2. But it's somehow ok to physically (and by extension, emotionally) hurt someone who did not even hurt you directly because you're angry at them?

Would you call what spiders do to insects "non-violent" or cats and mice? Lions and gazelles? Violence is very much necessary a lot of the time. Even shaolin monks realize this.

No, don't be silly. Of course violence is a way of life, especially among wild animals, and in the case of say, killing animals for food, or skins, or testicle baloons, or what have you. Animals don't tend to have the capacity to know any better. We have, for the most part, however, evolved beyond the survival "need" for violence. Is it still a part of our society? Sure? Does it become "neccessary" sometimes? Yes. Do some people crave it? Sure. But by and large, I would say we have, as a species, moved into a point where we are capable of living without violence among each other. Not likely to. But capable of it.

So I would hope you're not being judgemental about my reaction to something you know very little about. The kid deserves a medium amount of pain directed at his face.

I'm not being judgemental at all. Where did I judge your tendency toward violence? I was simply making a point.

If the issue is sex, no it doesn't solve it nicely, because you're still -cheating

If the issue is "I want good sex and I am not getting it", and you're not getting good sex, and you GET good sex...you are solving your problem. Are you also creating more problems? Most of the time. Is it an efficient and simple way to solve your problem? No. But you are still solving your "The sex is bad" problem.

-. Solving the problem would be to break up with the person and THEN get with someone else. Not "shop around" until you're satisfied, despite the dishonesty and heartache you're causing.

I never said solving one problem didn't create other problems.

Seriously, bro, defending cheating means one of two things:

"Defending cheating" is sort of a broad statement. I understand it more than I appreciate it's existence and use.

-Either you've done it and are defending yourself indirectly..

Nope. Nice amateur psychology, though. You know what works better than making assumptions? Asking questions to clarify a person's mindset.

-You're just trying to sound "open minded" or something...

Yes. Perish the thought that I am in fact, actually sort of open minded, when I can just try to sound like I am.

It's just wrong, there's no debate for it. I bet if I made a thread about how killing babies is wrong, someone would argue against it.

I guess it depends on why one kills the baby. Is it the spawn of Satan?

Why can't we all just agree? Even in the obviously correct things to agree on.

We can agree that cheating causes problems because of the social ideas associated with relationships and by extension, the idea of "ownership" that is prevalent in our societies.

Why can't we just agree, period? Because that's not how the world works. People have different views.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"