- Joined
- Jul 23, 2004
- Messages
- 70,181
- Reaction score
- 215
- Points
- 73
How about a wallpaper for you Torch lovers out there!
No, the maker of this wallpaper is in the bottom right hand corner of it....I wish I could make this stuff...hunter rider said:kel you are the super lady!!!!![]()
I'll save that in my file for now as i have a great Batman hush wallpaper that i'm keeping for now.
Did you make it ?

ive been trying to get that second one for a whileDidn't you see the leaked FF footage?hunter rider said:just been wondering about how it will look when johnny flames on.What i mean is that they are gonna have to be careful to make sure it looks great but also not like a man is being set on fire,as that might cause a problem with the ratings board.this just came to mind as everytime you see somebody engulfed in flames in a movie it's usually horrific,and while we know that johnny's flame is in a completely different context i think they still have to make sure visually that it doesnt look like he's being set on fire and that in his case it is a good thing.just a thought anyway![]()

This reminds me of the whole controversy on Dark Angel when Max (Jessica's character) rides her motorcycle with no helmet...they had to explain within the dialogue how she could get away with it...then the Fox execs. let it pass..."She's a genetically enhanced killing machine" so she doesn't need a helmet...they can take care of this as far as Johnny is concerned...I see no problems with it whatsoever....again this isn't Jackass, The Movie...those guys are nuts...hunter rider said:just been wondering about how it will look when johnny flames on.What i mean is that they are gonna have to be careful to make sure it looks great but also not like a man is being set on fire,as that might cause a problem with the ratings board.this just came to mind as everytime you see somebody engulfed in flames in a movie it's usually horrific,and while we know that johnny's flame is in a completely different context i think they still have to make sure visually that it doesnt look like he's being set on fire and that in his case it is a good thing.just a thought anyway![]()
thanks kmack,i have seen the footage i was just pondering if there might be a rating problem over the difference between being set on fire and flaming on,i know there shouldn't be but these days everything is scrutinised and there always seems to be some group or other complaing about something.Still you guy's are right It's a comic book movie so the rating's board should realise the context.not trying to start a bash just curious to see if anyone else thought it might be an issue.Kmackintrush said:Hope it helps![]()
Wow....thanks Lightnin......LightninStrikez said:Thanks Kel! You are a true umbiquitous Goddess indeed! LOL You're just....EVERYWHERE...like the wind!![]()
lovelyDarko said:Such a tender and loving moment between you too. With that being said, I think I gotta go take a s**t now.![]()

you know s**t and love go together in some relationshipssurfergirl said:lovely![]()

Selma Blair's character in "Hellboy" was totaly engulfed in flames (albeit it was blue fire) and it looked good....and I don't know of any problems that that FX had with the ratings board.hunter rider said:just been wondering about how it will look when johnny flames on.What i mean is that they are gonna have to be careful to make sure it looks great but also not like a man is being set on fire,as that might cause a problem with the ratings board.this just came to mind as everytime you see somebody engulfed in flames in a movie it's usually horrific,and while we know that johnny's flame is in a completely different context i think they still have to make sure visually that it doesnt look like he's being set on fire and that in his case it is a good thing.just a thought anyway![]()
hunter rider said:you know s**t and love go together in some relationships![]()
Sadly that is very trueLightninStrikez said:Yes, indeed. And s**t and life go just swell together too.![]()