Drugs Are Bad For You

HellOnEarth

Civilian
Joined
Aug 18, 2006
Messages
707
Reaction score
0
Points
11
Let's have a honest discussion:

Would you rather smoke weed or smoke cigarettes, if you were to choose from one or the other?

I'd go with weed, because it doesn't give you cancer. How about you?

Is nicotine a drug? How about alcohol?
 
Get high on life maaaaaannnn.
 
I don't like the drugs but the drugs like me.
 
Don't ever do drugs...coz drugs ur beyyyyyyyyyyyyyde.
 
teddy.jpg

:csad:
 
science has not proven "why" cigerretes cause cancer.. the tar doesn't go where the cancer starts.... the reason people think "weed" doesn't cause cancer is based on nothing, you don't hear about weed causing cancer becase people don't smoke it like cigs.... people smoke 10, 15 a day.... how much pot does one person smoke, one, two Js a day....

weed is technically a vegatable, and burning vegatables have cancer causing agents in them too....
 
HellOnEarth said:
So what's the difference between vegetables and tar?
I prefer veg with meat, but that's a personal thing.
 
I bet the Hype causes cancer.:csad:
 
HellOnEarth said:
So what's the difference between vegetables and tar?


tar technically was a plant at one time.... I'm not really sure though, all I know is they both have cancer causing smoke when burned... the hole myth of "weed" not causing cancer is that people don't chain smoke weed
 
ecstacy gets you ****ed up without feeling ****ed up..
 
Equint77 said:
ecstacy gets you ****ed up without feeling ****ed up..
"The More You Know..."
 
JokerNick said:
weed will give you cancer... look it up
But be careful who you look up. American studies, particularly those conducted by the government (and in the USA, that pretty much means every study) are notoriously biased against marijuana because they're funded by a government that gets money from keeping drugs illegal, and by the tobacco lobby, which also makes money by keeping drugs illegal.

American studies traditionally make the mistake of assuming that the average marijuana smoker smokes as much weed as the average tobacco smoker smokes tobacco. That is not true, of any but the most ridic stoner. I don't even think I've met a stoner who smoked that much weed. But this is the stoner that they base their studies on.

If you look at a real study, which examines the effects of marijuana use on the average weed smoker, you'll find that the risk of cancer is there, because weed smoke does have more carcinogens and is held in the lungs longer, but because so much less is smoked, the risk is significantly, significantly, SIGNIFICANTLY lower. Like, it's not gonna ****in' happen.

Brain cell destruction is also considerably less than that of alcohol and harder drugs, and recent studies actually suggest that weed grows brain cells.

JokerNick said:
the hole myth of "weed" not causing cancer is that people don't chain smoke weed
Right, which basically makes it not a myth.

Equint77 said:
ecstacy gets you ****ed up without feeling ****ed up..ecstacy gets you ****ed up without feeling ****ed up..
That wasn't ecstasy that you tried, son. Ecstasy is beeeeeyyyyyyde.

I personally smoke cigs and weed, and drink like a fish. But I'm fully aware that the healthiest of these habits, by far, is weed. I also know that I'll quit all three if/when I have kids. My half-sister's dad was a super-stoner when he was raising her and it was not good for her. So in that respect, drugs, including nic and alcohol, are bad. I don't think I could be a good father if I had to take a break from raising my kids to grab a cig, or if I couldn't get through the day without a jay, or a shot.

Know what's awesome, though? Shrooms, dude. Nonaddictive (well, psychologically they probably can be), non-carcinogenic, and they will **** you up, but good. Man, I had a conversation with Superman, watched rocks breathing, got in a boxing match with reality, pursued my best friend across the Utah Canyonlands, Gunslinger-style, for at least a month, and totally re-centered myself, philosophically and theologically, all in one afternoon at the Canyonlands. Now that's good clean fun.
 
I am a regular pot smoker, also big tobacco smoker, I stopped drinking in january and as far as all the research I've made, weed is the least harmful of all those substances

it's just that there's a huge, unjustified bias towards it
 
Ahh, I see.

So I can light up now?

It's my first time.

How would I feel?
 
HellOnEarth said:
Ahh, I see.

So I can light up now?

It's my first time.

How would I feel?
if you have some, light it up

nice to know it's your first time

you tell me
 
I smoke weed ALOT. Is it bad for me? Yes. Do I care? Nope.
 
HellOnEarth said:
Let's have a honest discussion:

Would you rather smoke weed or smoke cigarettes, if you were to choose from one or the other?

I'd go with weed, because it doesn't give you cancer. How about you?

Is nicotine a drug? How about alcohol?

If given the choice, I'd take cigs over weed even though I'd rather eat tree bark than smoke anything. Weed is a drug. A single joint will pump your brain with 60 psychoactive chemicals. That makes you stupid and sometimes dangerous. And before anyone starts to huff and puff about alcohol, I feel the same way about that. Futhermore, any kind of smoke in your lungs will cause health complications over time- cigs, weed, cigars, etc...
You can have fun without altering your consciousness or filling your body with toxins. Stay clean. SXE
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
201,163
Messages
21,908,354
Members
45,703
Latest member
BMD
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"