- Joined
- Aug 17, 2003
- Messages
- 72,535
- Reaction score
- 43,451
- Points
- 203
Blade Runner 2049 was a masterpiece. Arrival was amazing as well. Denis I think makes some of the best looking films being made now
It really does, the game trailer sets the table. There's this planet with spice, spice is needed for damn near everything, space travel, superpowers, political power etc, the planet has no water meaning it's a F'ed up place, because of the value of spice you have three houses battling over it. Boom! ready, set, and go.
The movie trailer is all over the place, Tim's character is kissing Zendaya, now he's hugging Jason Mamoa, fat dude in a bathtub, Batista walking all mean, oh and there's a pain box. Like seriously, lay some ground work for people not in the know.
Eh, I'd place Villeneuve ahead of Nolan for a few years now. I haven't seen Tenet yet, but have not truly enjoyed Nolan's film from TDKR till Dunkirk. I also feel like Villeneuve is much better at portraying emotion through his characters. I also don't want to derail the thread further, but Nolan ain;t fit to wash Quentin's jockstrap at this time.
I watched Incendies for the first time a few weeks ago and that hit me like a pile of bricks.
I wouldn't even place Nolan in top 10 of modern directors.

Nolan has made more movies I love. But I love the movies I love from Denis more. 2049, Prisoners and Sicaro are some of my all time favorites, with 2049 being a top 10er for me. Where as Nolan takes up a lot of room in the top 15-50. Does that make sense?Thus far I'd put Nolan ahead of Villeneuve.
Eh, I'd place Villeneuve ahead of Nolan for a few years now. I haven't seen Tenet yet, but have not truly enjoyed Nolan's film from TDKR till Dunkirk. I also feel like Villeneuve is much better at portraying emotion through his characters. I also don't want to derail the thread further, but Nolan ain't fit to wash Quentin's jockstrap at this time.
I watched Incendies for the first time a few weeks ago and that hit me like a pile of bricks.
For all it's cheap budget issues and such, I do love the pair of Dune mini-series. Also eternally made James McAvoy Leto II in my head (even if it should be III). Really got me into the mythos. That all said, this trailer is better then those minis already imo.This movie looks good. My favorite take on the movie was the one done by the SyFy channel but I hope that this is just as good.

Nolan has made more movies I love. But I love the movies I love from Denis more. 2049, Prisoners and Sicaro are some of my all time favorites, with 2049 being a top 10er for me. Where as Nolan takes up a lot of room in the top 15-50. Does that make sense?

If this is as amazing as I hope, Denis will pass Nolan for me.
To be fair to the spinning top, I think it had different intentions then the Kafka spider.That giant spider kept me up more than that spinning top ever did.
![]()

Both Dune 2000 and Children of Dune remain as the definitive versions of Dune for me, especially Children of Dune which I just love to pieces and the score in that series alone will always remain as some of my favorite bits of music ever and I am going to try and re-watch both before this comes out. There has always been room for improvement though which is why I'm so excited for this modern adaptation.
As for Denis vs. Nolan I honestly think there both great directors who have made plenty of films that I either loved or thought were great at worst. I just wish Denis had way more success with his films commercially, because he deserves the recognition.
Considering Baron Harkonnen is in cahoots with the Emperor, and that the Emperor is the one assigning House Atreides to Arrakis in the first place, isn't it a little weird that the Emperor isn't in this? He seems pretty relevant to the plot to not be present at all.
I just wish Denis had way more success with his films commercially, because he deserves the recognition.
2008 called. They want their outdated opinion back.His action sequences are always very hard to follow due to shaky camera work and too many cuts
I don't like Nolan movies much at all. His action sequences are always very hard to follow due to shaky camera work and too many cuts, and a sound editor he has worked with on most of his films recently speculated that Nolan intentionally muffles the dialog in his movies because he feels like if people have to work harder to understand the plot, they'll be more engaged. To me that just comes off as pretentious, which is my general impression of Nolan's films to begin with. I shouldn't have to turn on subtitles to understand what the hell the characters are saying when I'm watching a film in my native language. He has his strengths, of course, but I'd put Villeneuve far ahead of him pretty much across the board.
I haven't watched any of Villeneuve's French-language films but I enjoy all five of his English release more than I enjoy any Nolan film. Arrival in particular I think is one of the better science fiction films ever released.
At least he made a lot better Blade Runner movie then Ridley Scott.Three of his four big budget Hollywood films were a success. If you accept that a movie generally has to make back ~2.5X its budget to be a success:
Prisoners - $122.1 million on a $46 million budget = 2.65X budget
Sicario - $84.9 million on a $30 million budget = 2.83X budget
Arrival - $203.4 million on a $47 million budget = 4.33X budget
Blade Runner 2049 - $260.5 million on a $185 million budget = 1.41X budget
Two moderate hits, one big hit, one big flop is what the scoreboard says.
He deserves a megahit, no question, but he's not some flop machine either. I don't think anybody could've made money with a Blade Runner film. Ridley Scott certainly didn't.
