Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]479843[/split]
The filmmaker and studio split due to differences in their vision of the film
Edgar Wright has left the Marvel Universe.
The Cornetto Trilogy and Scott Pilgrim director and the Disney-owned Marvel Studios announced in a joint statement that he has left the big screen adaptation of Ant-Man, which stars Paul Rudd.
Marvel and Edgar Wright jointly announced today that the studio and director have parted ways on ANT-MAN due to differences in their vision of the film, a statement read. The decision to move on is amicable and does not impact the release date on July 17, 2015. A new director will be announced shortly.
i am as big of an mcu fan as anybody (and this is coming from a non-cb guy), but dofp is much more diverse than the avengers by far.
What is a departure? Which part specifically? You're speaking in generalities.
And you're being incredibly veiled.
What I'm saying is that if the story about Disney's meddling is true, than that might be a sign of further meddling from them in future films, which would be a departure from Marvel's usual policy of giving the filmmakers free reign artistically.
I don't know what you mean by that.
what has diversity to do with Wright leaving?
Maybe Disney thought what all of us were thinking. Ant-Man would be a flop. Forget Wright as a director did any of you believe it would do well at the box office? I would go see the film because it's a Marvel Studios project, but if it flopped Disney wouldn't let Marvel take too many risks.
I remember hearing because the bad sales of the Green Lantern animated DVD DC went back to just Supes and Batman. Phase 3 is about introducing new characters (Dr Strange, Black Panther, etc.) if Ant-Man flopped Disney would say go back to what makes $$$.
If Avengers didn't do well. Disney wouldn't have ok a risk like GoTG, which is an unproven property.
I don't think they ever have. Ed Norton, Alan Taylor and Favreau all had issues with someone at Marvel prying.
What I'm saying is that if the story about Disney's meddling is true, than that might be a sign of further meddling from them in future films, which would be a departure from Marvel's usual policy of giving the filmmakers free reign artistically.
That Ant-Man is a great, underrated character?Maybe Disney thought what all of us were thinking.
I had heard that Norton's departure had more to do with pay scale than artistic integrity. I also hadn't heard anything about why Favreau left, at leads nothing consistent.
Taylor's a good example, though. It sounds like the Thor 2 production was a general mess.
I think you seem to forget how film studios work at this level. If you want to sit there and pretend this is still Marvel working out of it's garage then you're living in a fantasy world.
There are certain complexities involved in aligning themselves with arguably the most connect TV/Film network on this planet. Neither Wright nor any other director is going to be allowed to go rogue as if this is some indie film. They all are going to fit a certain framework, especially the one being established within' the MCU.
Hope Springs Eternal.That Ant-Man is a great, underrated character?
I'm aware of that and I never said that it wasn't the case. The thing is, most of the Marvel films have allowed for a lot of creativity and individual artistic freedom within that framework. Iron man 3, Avengers, Captain America 2, and likely Guardians of the Galaxy are all very unique films that do their own thing within the understanding of a shared MCU. I'm just worried that might change, and the films will become more homogenized and focus group-y.
Iron Man had 4 writers, in fact most phas1 movies had more than 2 writersThere were five different writers on that thing at various points and it showed.
It was a real pity that Malekith could not be more developed .There were five different writers on that thing at various points and it showed.
You keep giving me all these recent quality examples of artistic freedoms and yet it's the Ant-Man example you want to fixate on. Clearly there's a limit and Wright of all people is likely to have tested it. That's not homogenized. That's their own vision, their own brand.