Ninjablade
Speedin' Around
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2015
- Messages
- 10,134
- Reaction score
- 20,165
- Points
- 103
Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates.
Starting January 9th, site maintenance is ongoing until further notice, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
Ahsoka, why do you look the way you do?
Budget can lead to issues. Obi-Wan is a fine example. But Chow still shot the hell out of it. Even with the flat backgrounds and corridors. And while I don't think it should've existed in the form it did (or at all) she got a lot of out of it, if you ignore episode 2.A smaller budget with $4.5M less per episode and a longer run time. Ahsoka has the lowest budget per episode of any live-action Star Wars show, but also the longest runtime (excluding Andor). Its budget at $100M is only slightly higher than Obi-Wan's $90M, but with two more episodes (95 minutes of additional run time).
Dave Filoni did a lot with (comparatively) very little.
This is great example that shows a lot of this is incredibly subjective. The Believer is one of my least favorite Mandalorian episodes and I'm on record saying I think it looks like a fan film. Genuinely did not understand people praising it when it came out. Different folks and all that.and their best looking episode is one shot on the side of a hill, watching old man Boba wreck people. You can argue the makeup being horrific is a straight budget issue (I wouldn't) but just how bad it looks is down to how the show is shot and color graded
It plays a role though. That additional $36M does allow for a lot more flexibility. You're not wrong that more money isn't some kind of magical fix though. Secret Invasion says hi. That show had about 3 times Ahsoka's budget per episode and looks infinitely worse.The directing, cinematography, editing, and action choreography are not super beholden to the budget.
Now, that part I won't argue. Watts has a proven track record with his Spider-Man trilogy. I'm also not saying that the Ahsoka series is perfect by any means. Just think it gets a lot of undeserved flack. It's still up there as some of my favorite Star Wars of all time, but of course, that too is incredibly subjective.This is Watts first showrunner job, and he's shown a far more adept hand then Filoni has in live action.
I don't disagree that they need to move away from the volume more. Book of Boba Fett is really where those limitations showed the most. Though, Ahsoka has more scenes not filmed on the volume than people realize. Quite a chunk of Peridea wasn't on the volume. Still a lot of green/blue screen obviously.I think the big problem is that Filoni started live action experience with the Volume. The Volume is a great tool, but it has limitations. And you need experience outside of the Volume to help work it best. And lets be honest here, Favreau has never been a great visual director, so THAT influence is not going to help. I think the Barrier alone is a good sign they recognize the limitations of it. Dark skies is a problem area for it. But add a sky covered in bright glowing green effects, suddenly, you can mask that deficit.
That's an issue for backgrounds and general spacing. That really doesn't explain much else. There are so many scenes where the characters are just standing next to each other, like they're taking behind the scenes footage. It's honestly shocking.I think the big problem is that Filoni started live action experience with the Volume. The Volume is a great tool, but it has limitations. And you need experience outside of the Volume to help work it best. And lets be honest here, Favreau has never been a great visual director, so THAT influence is not going to help. I think the Barrier alone is a good sign they recognize the limitations of it. Dark skies is a problem area for it. But add a sky covered in bright glowing green effects, suddenly, you can mask that deficit.
What makes it look like a fan film to you? Is it the location? Because my point is that no matter the location, you can still direct the hell out of it. You could film a lightsaber fight in a parking lot. It won't look like it's in SW, but that wouldn't mean you didn't shoot it well.This is great example that shows a lot of this is incredibly subjective. The Believer is one of my least favorite Mandalorian episodes and I'm on record saying I think it looks like a fan film. Genuinely did not understand people praising it when it came out. Different folks and all that.
Secret Invasion and Ahsoka are comparable in the looks department.It plays a role though. That additional $36M does allow for a lot more flexibility. You're not wrong that more money isn't some kind of magical fix though. Secret Invasion says hi. That show had about 3 times Ahsoka's budget per episode and looks infinitely worse.
I find Ahsoka is some of the absolute worst canon Star Wars. Which sucks for someone who was a TCW and Rebels truther from the start.Now, that part I won't argue. Watts has a proven track record with his Spider-Man trilogy. I'm also not saying that the Ahsoka series is perfect by any means. Just think it gets a lot of undeserved flack. It's still up there as some of my favorite Star Wars of all time, but of course, that too is incredibly subjective.
Don't want to derail this thread too much though. Probably shouldn't have taken the bait, but can't help myself.
Happy you're enjoying Skeleton Crew and I'm having a great time with it too!
At Attin and that whole mystery is a very clever hook (and works well for viewers not as familiar with Star Wars).
That people think all of Ahsoka is filmed on the Volume says what about Ahsoka?I don't disagree that they need to move away from the volume more. Book of Boba Fett is really where those limitations showed the most. Though, Ahsoka has more scenes not filmed on the volume than people realize. Quite a chunk of Peridea wasn't on the volume. Still a lot of green/blue screen obviously.
It's me and @Sithborg !