Steelsheen said:i want Bana back.
heck i want the entire original cast back.
AVEITWITHJAMON said:I saw plenty of emotions from Bana, his anger moments were great, and the moment were he re-visits his house he shows plenty of emotion, not to mention the scene's with his father.
The origin to the HULK in the TV show was a slap in the face to the comic and its fans. I loved the HULK movie, would have hated it if it followed the TV show.Malus said:The "Daddy-killed-Mommy-and-I-repressed-the-memory" bullcrap was my main problem with Ang Lee's mangling of the Hulk. None of that was necessary. If you just have to go mucking up the Hulk's origins, then the 70's tv show's origin followed a better premise, in my opinion: After being unable to free his wife from a terrible car accident, Banner discovers that some people (even frail old ladies) have been documented lifting vehicles right off the ground in times of similar stress. Banner becomes understandably obsessed with finding out why. He discovers that gamma radiation was way up during those apparently miraculous feats and way down at the time of his and his wife's accident. This discovery leads to Banner bathing himself in gamma radiation, and one stubborn flat tire later, the Hulk was born. No disturbing traumatized child bullcrap.
Everything was scaled down in the tv show (especially the Hulk's size relative to the comics) but emotionally it clicked with people. The psychodrama that Ang Lee trotted out was not any Hulk that I know, and the deranged Daddy stuff insured that no kid of mine will watch the film til they're at least 9 or 10 years old. Very grim, very negative stuff. It didn't have to be that way, and there's no way Lee & Kirby would have signed off on the mangling had it been submitted for their approval.
But yes, Bana was top notch in the part and I hope he's back.
Even if they were totally re-doing the origin story, I'd still be for keeping him.
And since all the sicko killer Daddy stuff was dispensed with in the first film, maybe they can simply move forward with a more recognizable Hulk story.
That's what I'm hoping, anyway.
Go complain to Marvel, they are the ones that set up the Father killed mother situation. Looong before Ang was ever involved with Hulk. They also setup the height changes by letting artists draw Hulk progressively larger and larger.Malus said:The "Daddy-killed-Mommy-and-I-repressed-the-memory" bullcrap was my main problem with Ang Lee's mangling of the Hulk. None of that was necessary. If you just have to go mucking up the Hulk's origins, then the 70's tv show's origin followed a better premise, in my opinion: After being unable to free his wife from a terrible car accident, Banner discovers that some people (even frail old ladies) have been documented lifting vehicles right off the ground in times of similar stress. Banner becomes understandably obsessed with finding out why. He discovers that gamma radiation was way up during those apparently miraculous feats and way down at the time of his and his wife's accident. This discovery leads to Banner bathing himself in gamma radiation, and one stubborn flat tire later, the Hulk was born. No disturbing traumatized child bullcrap.
Everything was scaled down in the tv show (especially the Hulk's size relative to the comics) but emotionally it clicked with people. The psychodrama that Ang Lee trotted out was not any Hulk that I know, and the deranged Daddy stuff insured that no kid of mine will watch the film til they're at least 9 or 10 years old. Very grim, very negative stuff. It didn't have to be that way, and there's no way Lee & Kirby would have signed off on the mangling had it been submitted for their approval.
But yes, Bana was top notch in the part and I hope he's back.
Even if they were totally re-doing the origin story, I'd still be for keeping him.
And since all the sicko killer Daddy stuff was dispensed with in the first film, maybe they can simply move forward with a more recognizable Hulk story.
That's what I'm hoping, anyway.
Secret_Riddle said:no offence to hulk lovers out there but i love the first movie and the approach to the movie of more as a drama then a mindless action film. i also loved the cast. from what i hear hulk 2 is just going to be an action film wich i know is what a lot of u want. but if it is just mindless action and eric bana, jeniffer conelly arnt in it (which they likely wont be if they dont like the script) then i probably wont see the movie. lmfao alright i probably will but ill be dissapointed.
AVEITWITHJAMON said:Totally agree with you, if Bana doesnt return i think that will indicate that this will be a poor movie, in the veign of Fantastic Four or X-Men 3, 100 minutes long and more action than character moments.
Agreed. The cast said around the time of Hulk's release they were motivated more to work with Ang than to work on a Hulk movie. If things turn out mediocre, I can see Bana bailing out.AVEITWITHJAMON said:Totally agree with you, if Bana doesnt return i think that will indicate that this will be a poor movie, in the veign of Fantastic Four or X-Men 3, 100 minutes long and more action than character moments.
Lobster Charlie said:And ya know, I don't quite understand all the Bana adoration...he was decent, a little too big to be "puny Banner," but you all seriously think he's simply the ONLY one who could play this role well? I mean, really??
Excel said:the big 3 should all be back. they were the only good thing bout the original flm.
sam elliotgvcool2 said:Eric Bana
Jennifer Connoly
and
????
Sava said:sam elliot