Eternal Youth or Invincibility?

[Whirlysplat]

What qualifies as "youth?"
18? 25?

7?

Good Question Ronny. Lets go for mid to late twenties or early thirties. Your young enough to be fully functioning but old enough for your views to be taken a little more seriously that in your teens and early twenties.

- Whirly

 

[Ronny Shade]

29 or 30 is good.

I guess, if I live my life the way I do now, I'd go for that one. (I live my life trying not to get myself killed)

However, if life were as I'd kinda want it to be, It'd be more like an action movie, in which case, I'd chose the invincible one.

 

[britrogue]

Eternal Youth definately. Nothing worries me more than getting old.

 

[Hades]

Eternal Youth definately. Nothing worries me more than getting old.

I'm sure that's what most women would say...

 

[redmarvel]

I've already got option 1, so I pick option 2.

The problem with eternal youth is:

a) watching all your friends & family grow old and die
b) trying to get seniors discounts when you look like you're 24
c) being expected to continue to hold down a job when you've already worked for 50 years
d) being treated like you know nothing by people young enough to be your son/daughter (or even grand child). You can get pretty tired of hearing "you'll know better when you reach my age".

 

[Ronny Shade]

I choose Vampire. You get both.

 

[Red]

When you say Invincibility do you mean inablity to age?

 

[Ronny Shade]

beautiful avvy, Red.

 

[Whirlysplat]

When you say Invincibility do you mean inablity to age?

nope think of it as invulnerability

 

[sithgoblin]

Eternal youth.

 

[LexCorp]

Would you rather have the ability to naturally live forever, but still be able to die from a serious wound...

Or would you rather be invincible for a lifetime, so that nothing can physically harm you?

- Whirly

I would like to live forever. Maybe find a way to become invincible over time. HEHE

 

[Danalys]

invincibility. since i'll still be sexy when i'm old anyway. also redmarvel's reasons were good.

 

[Hades]

invincibility. since i'll still be sexy when i'm old anyway. also redmarvel's reasons were good.

Even when your balls droop so much they fall into the toilet when ever you take a crap?

 

[Danalys]

i'll build a deeper toilet in that case. or contruct some kind of balls bra. or convince people that sagging balls are sexy.

 

[LexCorp]

i'll build a deeper toilet in that case. or contruct some kind of balls bra. or convince people that sagging balls are sexy.

Very good solution.

 

[ampersand]

If invincibility means that I can't get hurt but I will get old and die, I'd definately go with that one. Think of the bar bets alone...

"betcha I can light my hand on fire..."

 

[The Question]

Invincibility. But really, if you were invincible, you would live forever. If nothing at all can harm you, then you're not going to die.

 

[Danalys]

yeah it's like why would gravity damage my balls when i'm invincible.

 

[The Question]

Exactly. No one ever simply died. Something killed them. If nothing can kill you, you're immortal.

 

[GoldenAgeHero]

invincibility. i beat the hell out of all the cops and not one can harm me.

 

[CapBeerCino]

Eternal Youth. Its all about the look

 

[LexCorp]

Eternal Youth. Its all about the look

Eternal beauty oh yeah!!!!

 

[ampersand]

Invincibility. But really, if you were invincible, you would live forever. If nothing at all can harm you, then you're not going to die.

I guess you would have to define Invincibility more specifically. Can you get a disease? Is your heart invincible? For that matter, are all your organs invincible or just your skin?

 

[LexCorp]

I guess you would have to define Invincibility more specifically. Can you get a disease? Is your heart invincible? For that matter, are all your organs invincible or just your skin?

Oh dear another thread question that was not explained in detail earlier on to avoid such lengthy debates.

I would take invincible as not able to be harmed in anyway.....

 

[Odin's Lapdog]

invincibility or at least impervious to outside physical harm


this thread falls yet again into a trap of leaving the question too open to interpertation due to vague generalising which means the poll is invalid and won't give the impression it's intended for.

bah