Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]347471[/split]
Hell, no. Wasn't suggesting it for the costumes necessarily, but rather a lot of the action scenes and backgrounds, particularly when they take place in space.GL fan?
I think Planet of The apes proved the technology is there. That was a completely CGI character that was on screen for most of the movie with more emotion and physical interaction than most human actors and the character was completely believable.
And because that character was based on a Chimpanzee - which is a real animal that we know and therefore can detect even slight imperfections - and because it was done on a relatively modest budget, I'm convinced that, with the right people, A CGI Thing could work.
he actually probably be one of the easier character to CG....
the hardest things to get right in CG is usually realistic/natural looking, skin and hair (which,the Thing, has neither).... another being realistic/natural body movement/facial expressions, which is where motion capture would come in.... the other major remaining issue in cg is the eyes (what people offend call "dead eyes") so, That I think would have to be the main focus, and would be the hardiest part, in terms of letting the actor show throw... but, from what I hear, raise of the planet of the apes, really showed that this can be done...
so, ya, I am all for the mo-cap/CGI, Thing
(but, it would still require a solid preference, not just a voice over, but, a good over all preference, to pull it off)
Anyone care to comment on my cast?
The biggest problem with Affleck as The Thing is that we can't have one of the world's most famous Bostonians play the quintessentially New York Ben Grimm.Frankly, when I saw Ben Affleck for the Thing, I wasn't sure if you were joking.
I feel that Alex Denisoff is too old, but I like Oliver Platt as the Mad Thinker and Paul Giamatti as Mole-man. Michael Dorn might be interesting as Galactus and I LOVE Gary Oldman as Wizard.
I'm not up on actors names to comment much on most of the others.
Ben Affleck? No. Sorry, but just no.
Frankly, when I saw Ben Affleck for the Thing, I wasn't sure if you were joking.
I feel that Alex Denisoff is too old, but I like Oliver Platt as the Mad Thinker and Paul Giamatti as Mole-man. Michael Dorn might be interesting as Galactus and I LOVE Gary Oldman as Wizard.
I'm not up on actors names to comment much on most of the others.
Ben Affleck? No. Sorry, but just no.
Well, Ben Affleck does look like Ben Grimm pre-transformation. And didn't someone on the previous Fantastic Four thread say that Mr. Fantastic is supposed to be middle-aged?
David Boreanaz is my pick for ben