The sequels didn't have enough screen time to use him like they did in Begins. There's nowhere in the story of TDK or TDKR that could have incorporated Crane as much as it did in BB.
The sequels didn't have enough screen time to use him like they did in Begins. There's nowhere in the story of TDK or TDKR that could have incorporated Crane as much as it did in BB.
Blake was supposed to have a bigger arc since he was Nolan's version of Robin, and was getting the mantle of the Batman at the end. Crane was just a lackey to Ra's. His importance was significantly less.
But on a personal note I much preferred Crane over Blake. I generally disliked Blake and most of his scenes in TDKR were a drag and badly written.
Is Neeson's Ra's really faithful to the original concept of the character at all? Or would you say he was altered to fit the story Nolan and Goyer wanted to tell about crime and vigilantism? I get the impression that classically, Ra's is mainly concerned with saving the natural world rather than society.
I would actually rank the DCAU Joker fourth, behind also the Nicholson Joker and the Arkham Joker (who is essentially the same character as the DCAU Joker, but he can get away with a lot more).
^You have no idea how silly that sounds when you think about it.
Cannot believe I missed this thread. DCAU, of course, though I don't think he has ever been portrayed too badly.
Is Neeson's Ra's really faithful to the original concept of the character at all?
I haven't seen it, but it looks like a poor man's version of Liam Neeson's Ra's.