Federal Judge Orders Halt To Warrantless Wiretapping

jaguarr

Be Your Own Hero
Joined
Nov 11, 2003
Messages
43,566
Reaction score
1
Points
31
http://www.thewbalchannel.com/news/9695327/detail.html

Judge Orders Halt To Warrantless Wiretapping

POSTED: 12:59 pm EDT August 17, 2006
UPDATED: 1:14 pm EDT August 17, 2006


DETROIT -- A federal judge ruled Thursday that the government's warrantless wiretapping program is unconstitutional and ordered an immediate halt to it. U.S. District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor in Detroit became the first judge to strike down the National Security Agency's program, which she says violates the rights to free speech and privacy as well as the separation of powers enshrined in the Constitution.

"Plaintiffs have prevailed, and the public interest is clear, in this matter. It is the upholding of our Constitution," Taylor wrote in her 43-page opinion.
The American Civil Liberties Union filed the lawsuit on behalf of journalists, scholars and lawyers who say the program has made it difficult for them to do their jobs. They believe many of their overseas contacts are likely targets of the program, which involves secretly listening to conversations between people in the U.S. and people in other countries.

The government argued that the program is well within the president's authority, but said proving that would require revealing state secrets.

The ACLU said the state-secrets argument was irrelevant because the Bush administration had already publicly revealed enough information about the program for Taylor to rule on the case.

"By holding that even the president is not above the law, the court has done its duty," said Ann Beeson, the ACLU's associate legal director and the lead attorney for the plaintiffs.

The NSA had no immediate comment on the ruling.

Taylor dismissed a separate claim by the ACLU over data-mining of phone records by the NSA. She said not enough had been publicly revealed about that program to support the claim and further litigation could jeopardize state secrets.



WOOHOOO!!!! :up:

jag
 
Wow, this is unexpected.
 
JLBats said:
Wow, this is unexpected.

Yeah, I had to read it twice just to make sure I was really seeing what I was seeing. Definitely not something I expected to see while Bushco was in power.

jag
 
...waits for the cries of "damned activist judges"...

It'll just be a predictable response from those who supported it
 
yeah- i was re-reading it myself.

[cheney]That judge is empowering the terrorists like ned lamont.[/cheney]


[cheney]oh, and all the voters of Connecticut who voted for Ned Lamont.[/cheney]
 
The government argued that the program is well within the president's authority, but said proving that would require revealing state secrets.

I wish I could've been there when the incumbent, lackey stooge was actually using rhetoric like this as the basis for argumentative statements. How some people can say things like this w/ a straight face is beyond me.:confused: :whatever:

Still, I'm shocked that this type of decision was made.
 
jaguarr said:
http://www.thewbalchannel.com/news/9695327/detail.html

Taylor dismissed a separate claim by the ACLU over data-mining of phone records by the NSA. She said not enough had been publicly revealed about that program to support the claim and further litigation could jeopardize state secrets.

The People : "dood you're all infringing upon my freedoms and privacy and ****!!!...what up with that"

The Government: " I'm so not, and I have proof I'm not"

The people: " I wan to see said proof"

The Government: " I can't show it to you :(......It's a secret :ninja:"
 
Mr Sparkle said:
The People : "dood you're all infringing upon my freedoms and privacy and ****!!!...what up with that"

The Government: " I'm so not, and I have proof I'm not"

The people: " I wan to see said proof"

The Government: " I can't show it to you :(......It's a secret :ninja:"

That's funny, you're funny.:)
 
Mr Sparkle said:
The People : "dood you're all infringing upon my freedoms and privacy and ****!!!...what up with that"

The Government: " I'm so not, and I have proof I'm not"

The people: " I wan to see said proof"

The Government: " I can't show it to you :(......It's a secret :ninja:"

I plead the fif, I plead the fif. One, two, three, four, fffiiiiif

Anything you say. Fif

Go ahead ask me a question.

*begins to ask question*

Fiiiifffff
 
"I'm not here to discuss the past."

"My English is...how you say...not so good"
 
Gosh-darn that activist judge, abusing her power to stand up to the federal government and protect the Constitution! I mean, it isn't like that's her job, right?
 
The judge's job is to be nothing more than a partisan hack, like everyone else in politics. ;)
 
B-but she's not being the right kind of partisan hack!:(
 
There's only one kind of partisan hack...
rp24.JPG
 
Finally, some undeniable proof that this administration is abusing its power.

This isn't an impeachable offense, is it?
 
finally! i can now get back to my NAMBLA phone chats!
 
I've been waiting eight months for this ruling. I know it'll be taken to the Supreme Court, who, because they're in Bush's back pocket, will rule in his favor. I don't think it'll make it there during the remainder of Bush's term, so any impeachment hopes should be quickly dashed. Anway, would you really want Dick in the Oval Office?
 
Future Prez said:
I've been waiting eight months for this ruling. I know it'll be taken to the Supreme Court, who, because they're in Bush's back pocket, will rule in his favor. I don't think it'll make it there during the remainder of Bush's term, so any impeachment hopes should be quickly dashed. Anway, would you really want Dick in the Oval Office?

what's the difference, he's the one driving the administration's policies anyway. he would just be effing this country over in plain sight, rather than hiding behind w.
 
jaguarr said:
http://www.thewbalchannel.com/news/9695327/detail.html

Judge Orders Halt To Warrantless Wiretapping

POSTED: 12:59 pm EDT August 17, 2006
UPDATED: 1:14 pm EDT August 17, 2006


DETROIT -- A federal judge ruled Thursday that the government's warrantless wiretapping program is unconstitutional and ordered an immediate halt to it. U.S. District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor in Detroit became the first judge to strike down the National Security Agency's program, which she says violates the rights to free speech and privacy as well as the separation of powers enshrined in the Constitution.

"Plaintiffs have prevailed, and the public interest is clear, in this matter. It is the upholding of our Constitution," Taylor wrote in her 43-page opinion.
The American Civil Liberties Union filed the lawsuit on behalf of journalists, scholars and lawyers who say the program has made it difficult for them to do their jobs. They believe many of their overseas contacts are likely targets of the program, which involves secretly listening to conversations between people in the U.S. and people in other countries.

The government argued that the program is well within the president's authority, but said proving that would require revealing state secrets.

The ACLU said the state-secrets argument was irrelevant because the Bush administration had already publicly revealed enough information about the program for Taylor to rule on the case.

"By holding that even the president is not above the law, the court has done its duty," said Ann Beeson, the ACLU's associate legal director and the lead attorney for the plaintiffs.

The NSA had no immediate comment on the ruling.

Taylor dismissed a separate claim by the ACLU over data-mining of phone records by the NSA. She said not enough had been publicly revealed about that program to support the claim and further litigation could jeopardize state secrets.



WOOHOOO!!!! :up:

jag

Yes best news this year! :up: :up:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"