Eggyman
The Oval Avenger
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2006
- Messages
- 17,500
- Reaction score
- 139
- Points
- 73
But I'm not gay!![]()
Well you should be

But you are obviously homophobic then . . . saying that your not gay, that's disgusting behaviour :heart:
But I'm not gay!![]()
Well you should be
But you are obviously homophobic then . . . saying that your not gay, that's disgusting behaviour :heart:
I am homophobic and heterophobic. Sex scares me![]()
What in the world happened to this thread?![]()
t:
What in the world happened to my thread?![]()
t:
the face(avvy) goes with what you said
It's easy to see how we got to this point: look at the thread title -- Jack on Heath and Tommy on Eckhart
Whose avvy?![]()
I am homophobic and heterophobic. Sex scares me![]()
This thread has ties to Schumacher's Batman films. It's obvious what turn it would take.
Whose avvy?
I think you're onto something![]()
Yes but I'm pretty sure the group-specific jokes you're talking about are more likely to be at the expense of women, gays and racial minorities than they are straight, white men. There's a double standard when it comes to "politically incorrect" humour, you'll note that there are far less jokes or offensive terminology in regards to straight, white men, if any at all. Why? Well because they're the people in power of course.
Actually there are tons of jokes in my country where they don't specify a race or sexual preference. So when the main person in those jokes is simply referred to as a "he", we always assume it's a white straight man. And those jokes are the majority, believe me.
Sorry to bring back this debate, but I had to answer.
Actually there are tons of jokes in my country where they don't specify a race or sexual preference. So when the main person in those jokes is simply referred to as a "he", we always assume it's a white straight man. And those jokes are the majority, believe me.
Sorry to bring back this debate, but I had to answer.
it takes 1 to round up some minorities to do it.
ya which one is more ignorant? Us calling Schumacher a *****e, or categorizing a whole group of stupid jokes with red necks...hmmm?
We'll catch 'em while they're attempting to jump the border.
I am playing halo and glazed over it. But you said it perfectly =)It's always a dodgy subject joking about a minority -- but they're just not that minor anymore. That isn't an excuse or any kind of defence . . . but Ghankin is right: If we are to live in a world where we all live equally, people's situations that put them in whatever pigeon-hole will be exploited and scrutinized -- joking or not.
Everybody is the butt of the joke at sometime or another, and to ignore our gay or foreign or whatever brothers and sisters all over the world would be to make their specific situations seem like the taboo subject that they once were -- still are in some cases.
Acceptances works both ways -- you're free to join the Country Club, but don't think it's all nice and polite; if someone sees an obese man plodding down the street, and if they're wanting to extract some urine, you know that they're not gonna make a joke about his choice in shoes.
Christ! For a minute there I thought I was in community lol! So what's this Batgeezer all about?
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
It was infected by teh gaynez.
It's easy to see how we got to this point: look at the thread title -- Jack on Heath and Tommy on Eckhart![]()
Ahhh I see.This thread has ties to Schumacher's Batman films. It's obvious what turn it would take.![]()
Do you guys still wear togas?
![]()