Logan Foxverse Hulk?

[ernesth100]

Is it possible for this last film we'll be able to get a Foxverse version of the Hulk for at least a small battle? We got MCU Quicksilver for one film why not Foxverse Hulk?

 

[GuestStar2004]

Very unlikely since FOX own X-Men while marvel own hulk so FOX can't use hulk, only reason marvel can use quicksilver is because quicksilver and Scarlett witch are the only 2 characters owned by both FOX and Marvel.

 

[auditor]

Hulk is owned by universal, not marvel

 

[psylockolussus]

Correct!

 

[Zarex]

Hulk is owned by universal, not marvel

Universal currently controls the distribution rights for a solo Hulk feature. Disney/Marvel owns the character and controls all other character rights including live action film rights. Disney/Marvel also owns the X-Men, FF and Spidey though there are licensing agreements in place regarding their live action rights as well.

 

[auditor]

I already understood all of that. Thank you though.

The quick short version of that is "universal owns hulk." Yeah technically they only own the rights to make Hulk movies, but people know what you mean.

Under current agreement Marvel can only use Hulk in other marvel movies with other characters.

 

[Roose Bolton]

Universal can't actually make Hulk movies, they can only distribute them. Whereas Marvel can actually make the Hulk movies but cannot distribute them.

 

[Orba]

Universal can't actually make Hulk movies, they can only distribute them. Whereas Marvel can actually make the Hulk movies but cannot distribute them.

To be specific Universal can only distribute solo Hulk movies, which is why Disney prefers to just use the Hulk as a supporting character like in Avengers, or like he will be in the next Thor.

 

[CyclopsWasRight]

If it's Old Man Logan like setting what characters could fill in for Hulks role in the movie?

I'd say bring back Blob and have him as the old, grey, decrepit obese cannibal with his portly kids, perhaps sired with another visually colourful mutant for more visual flair.

 

[Spider-Fan83]

thing?

 

[NotNickFury]

I don't think anyone at Fox wants to remind the public of Fantastic Four anytime soon.

 

[GuestStar2004]

it would be weird for the thing to have that anyway for many reasons

 

[Mike Murdock]

I already understood all of that. Thank you though.

The quick short version of that is "universal owns hulk." Yeah technically they only own the rights to make Hulk movies, but people know what you mean.

Under current agreement Marvel can only use Hulk in other marvel movies with other characters.

But that's unhelpful - especially in this context since the question was about using the Hulk in a Fox movie. Marvel can allow Fox to do this, Universal cannot.

 

[I'm Venom]

I've been debating how this could work, as I'd love to see it succeed, and I think it could be cool to swap out Hulk for Sabertooth. Bring back Schreiber, but have him maybe a bit Mane-ish. He could've been in hiding or off doing his own thing, since the first movie.

 

[Mike Murdock]

Giving Sabertooth would be fun. However, it's all moot since this isn't a direct adaptation of Old Man Logan anyway.

 

[Spider-Fan83]

I don't think anyone at Fox wants to remind the public of Fantastic Four anytime soon.

ok how about...

Spoiler

or

or