France Rejects War On Terror

celldog

Sidekick
Joined
Feb 21, 2002
Messages
3,001
Reaction score
0
Points
31
Well.......should we be surprised??? :whatever:


France rejects "war on terror"
Thu Sep 7, 2006 8:27am ET
International News
PARIS (Reuters) - France issued an implicit criticism of U.S. foreign policy on Thursday, rejecting talk of a "war on terror".

Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin, speaking in parliament, expressed these views on global terrorism, while President Jacques Chirac backed France's claims to the international front rank with a fresh defense of his country's nuclear arsenal.

Villepin noted Chirac's strong opposition to the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in 2003 and said the Arab state had now sunk into violence and was feeding new regional crises.

"Let us not forget that these crises play into the hands of all extremists," the prime minister said in a debate on the Middle East. "We can see this with terrorism, whether it tries to strike inside or outside our frontiers," he added.


"Against terrorism, what's needed is not a war. It is, as France has done for many years, a determined fight based on vigilance at all times and effective cooperation with our partners.

"But we will only end this curse if we also fight against injustice, violence and these crises," he said.

Villepin's remarks, which came a day after U.S. President George Bush admitted that the CIA had interrogated dozens of terrorism suspects in secret foreign locations, did not explicitly mention the United States.

But his rejection of language employed by Bush, who often uses the expression "war on terror" underlined the longstanding differences between Paris and Washington.

In separate remarks, Chirac stressed that France was committed to maintaining a nuclear arsenal of its own.

"In an uncertain world, facing constantly evolving threats, nuclear dissuasion guarantees our vital interests," Chirac said on a visit to France's Atomic Energy Commission nuclear simulation facility at Bruyeres-le-Chatel near Paris.

He stressed that France was committed to funding continuing research and development into nuclear weapons technology.

"There can be no great ambition without adequate means, that's clear," he said. "The position of countries is never guaranteed. In the 21st century, only those which make science a genuine priority will stay ahead."

Both France and the United States have played down splits opened by the Iraq war, pointing especially to cooperation on attempts by the West to contain Iran's nuclear ambitions.


But differences in tone and style have often resurfaced, notably during the Lebanon crisis, where France initially offered to send just 400 peacekeepers to Lebanon despite vigorously backing calls for an international force.

Villepin's speech in parliament made much of France's leading role in securing a peace agreement in Lebanon backed by the United Nations, which he said had shown the virtues of "listening and dialogue."

"It is the duty of France and Europe to show that the clash of civilizations is not inevitable," he said. "No one retains this wisdom, inherited from our history, as we, French and Europeans, do," he said.




Leave it to the Frenchies to drop their pants and bend over. This is just swell. So inspite of 911, Bali bombings, beheadings, cartoon riots in Europe and abroad, recent London subway attacks, a thwarted Airline attack in London 3 weeks ago, Spanish trains exploding and verbals video taped threats to the west to convert to Islam or die http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/asiapcf/09/02/zawahiri.tape/ , they want to cover their eyes like the little kid in a dark room.

I know I haven't posted this pic in a while. But I feel a need for it now.....Sorry......

UltimateCaptainAmerica.jpg
 
The difference between the french and toast is you can actually make soldiers out of toast.
 
Because what the world needs is more soldiers....
 
Well France has nukes (didn't know about that) and nukes are bad. Nukes destroy the environment and life. And that pisses off Mother Nature...which is the planet in general.

I don't think France wants to enter a war. Maybe they don't want to risk innocent lives? I just hope they aren't cowards and just go nuke happy instead. Again, Nukes are bad. There can be no world peace with nukes around. All nukes would need to be deactivated and that may never happen. Even if the USA signed a treaty and held a live broadcast showing the deactivation of all our nukes...it may not work.
 
Celldog, you bring shame to yourself with every new post that you make.

There are republicans, and then there is people like Celldog and Ann Coulter. You do your side no favours!!!

"War on Terror" is an idiotic slogan that should never have been uttered. It's like a damn catchphrase. Bush keeps mentioning "war on terror, war on terror, war on terror" in every single speech he makes. It's sickening. You shouldn't be standing by something like that. How easy it is for Bush to garner support with one simple phrase.
 
kainedamo said:
Celldog, you bring shame to yourself with every new post that you make.


Funny.........I don't feel any shame. :rolleyes:

There are republicans, and then there is people like Celldog and Ann Coulter. You do your side no favours!!!

I'm in good company then.

"War on Terror" is an idiotic slogan that should never have been uttered. It's like a damn catchphrase. Bush keeps mentioning "war on terror, war on terror, war on terror" in every single speech he makes. It's sickening. You shouldn't be standing by something like that. How easy it is for Bush to garner support with one simple phrase.

This is not some simple little catch phrase. It's a reality!! It's a reality that was here long before Bush. Did you forget the first bombing in 93'??? We weren't in Iraq were we?? Nor in Afghanistan. And even if you don't want to consider yourself at war with these terrorists, that changes nothing. Know why??? Because in THEIR minds they are at war with YOU. You ignore a video tape that tells us to convert or die and I'm the one who should ashamed??? LOL Where are the men...........

Try ignoring your enemy and before too long, you're dead.
:unishr:
 
enterthemadness said:
Well France has nukes (didn't know about that) and nukes are bad. Nukes destroy the environment and life. And that pisses off Mother Nature...which is the planet in general.

I don't think France wants to enter a war. Maybe they don't want to risk innocent lives? I just hope they aren't cowards and just go nuke happy instead. Again, Nukes are bad. There can be no world peace with nukes around. All nukes would need to be deactivated and that may never happen. Even if the USA signed a treaty and held a live broadcast showing the deactivation of all our nukes...it may not work.


I don't like nukes either. But in an evil world they are a necessary evil. Most.....not all mad men back off when mutual destruction is a possibility.
 
Fried Gold said:
Because what the world needs is more soldiers....


Yes we do. Unfortunately.....and more policemen.
 
celldog said:
I don't like nukes either. But in an evil world they are a necessary evil. Most.....not all mad men back off when mutual destruction is a possibility.

Nukes aren't nescessary. It takes only one pissed off jackass to hit a button to launch a nuke. One nuke launches, we may have 2 more launch, then 10, then all of them. Before you know it, it be nuke winter and the earth is ****ed over. Man kinds worst decision was the Nuke and Atom Bomb. Any weapon that can mess up the enviroment or end all life on Earth is just wrong.
 
enterthemadness said:
Nukes aren't nescessary. It takes only one pissed off jackass to hit a button to launch a nuke. One nuke launches, we may have 2 more launch, then 10, then all of them. Before you know it, it be nuke winter and the earth is ****ed over. Man kinds worst decision was the Nuke and Atom Bomb. Any weapon that can mess up the enviroment or end all life on Earth is just wrong.


You're entitled to your opinion.
 
Just as France is entitled to theirs. At anyrate, they are right. There cannot be a war on terror. It is fundamentally flawed, just like the war on crime and the war on drugs.
 
War on Terror is simply a lame slogan.

And having that mentality during these times is harmful. Terrorist leaders are spreading the belief that America is at war with Islam, and that this war shall last as long as Allah wills it.

By claiming that we're at war with such a broad idea, as well as consistently invading and degrading Muslim countries, we've pretty much been proving them right.

And celldog, posting in bold type is annoying and does nothing to help your argument. You only come off as aggressive. That and you appear to be over-compensating for your extreme lack of logic.
 
How dare the French disagree with the USA... You should NUKE the bastards :o
 
C.F. Kane said:
War on Terror is simply a lame slogan.

And having that mentality during these times is harmful. Terrorist leaders are spreading the belief that America is at war with Islam, and that this war shall last as long as Allah wills it.

By claiming that we're at war with such a broad idea, as well as consistently invading and degrading Muslim countries, we've pretty much been proving them right.

And celldog, posting in bold type is annoying and does nothing to help your argument. You only come off as aggressive. That and you appear to be over-compensating for your extreme lack of logic.

Exactly. The war on terror is essentially Bush's war on Islam and the Middle East. There is no real way to fight a war on terror as all you need is one nut job with a home made bomb and you have 'terror'
 
So let me get this straight celldog, marvel is rascist for not having enough cosmic black characters but it's fine to label france as a bunch of cowards. Or is the quaint little celldog logic where it's only possible to be rascist against someone who has something in common with celldog (e.g. a martyr complex).

You can't start anti-rascist threads and rascist threads at the same time man, world doesn't work that way
 
ALL OF EUROPE SHOULD BE LIKE THE ONE EUROPEAN COUNTRY THAT JUST GRABS ITS ANKLES FOR THE GREATEST COUNTRY ON EARTH! GO BRITAIN!

bcover5.jpg
 
Who's stupid enough to think the 'A' on CA's forehead stands for France?

I mean, hello, France begins with an 'F'.

Most likely the 'A' the Captain is referring to stands for Alberta.
 
celldog said:

Great comic book read. This part made me laugh. Should have added:

SURRENDER? SURRENDER!?!?
 
No, im pretty sure it stands for Alberta.
 
The terrorists (-cough-15 year old muslims) already beat France because they didn't pay them enough money.:(

ddd.11022005.muslim.terror.france.paris.riots.fire.cross.225.jpg
 
France, lol.... who needs them... name one thing France has done in the past 100 years to has helped the world.... all France is known for is women with hairy arm pits, and their biggest business, the manufacturing of white flags.... all France knows how to do is surrender.... let them sit in their country, and be the typical a-holes they are.... France. HAHAHAHA.......

France has absoultely no idea on how to handle Tierney, back in the late 30s, they allowed Hitler to turn Germany, into the global threat they became, they sat back and let it happen, and look what happened to them,... if it wasn't for us, everything France now takes for granted would be gone.... France was unable to learn from their mistakes... they are pulling the same crap now with Terrorists, they rather sit back, and make enemies of people trying to be good... why, because they are smug a-holes... they rather complain and burn bridges then stand up for whats right and fight... If you want peace, you must prepare for war....

whatever happened to the bad-ass French that helped us back during the revolutionary times.....
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"