FilmNerdJamie
Obtainer of wrong opinions!
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2008
- Messages
- 8,984
- Reaction score
- 234
- Points
- 73
For a guy who ****ed up X-Men.....His Superman movie could of been great though.
I know I've said this before. But...
The Ratner hate has hit a "full on ******" high. The dude was brought in so late into the game that he didn't have time to make any significant changes to what had been written and decided upon regarding plot. At the same time, he can't run around with this "Mine was more successful!" crap because it was a foregone conclusion The Last Stand was going to kick ass at the box-office. The first two films were so damn popular (and successful) that people were going in regardless.
If anyone deserves the blame for The Last Stand (which is a perfectly watchable film - just an epic-level of disappointment and sheer laziness/half-assery), it's the producers, 20th Century Fox and, to a degree, Bryan Singer.
Ratner was one of the last people brought on board. Most of the key decisions (like casting, plot, location, etc.) had already been decided on. They literally needed a director to do a "9 to 5" job - i.e. tell the DP where to point the camera, BS the actors/crew, etc. in order to make its release date.
Last edited: