gdw
Superhero
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2002
- Messages
- 5,873
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 33
So, this is obviously pretty in your face thematically, and not only important to the film, but the greater DCEU.
It's what sets DC apart from Marvel, and I LOVE that it is in full force in this movie.
What I also love is that it moved from religious allegory, to mythology.
It may seem ironic that I loved this aspect so much, considering I HATED the heavy handed Christ imagery in MOS and Superman Returns.
While I'm fine with the Christ, and Moses parallels in the character, especially considering the obvious inspiration.
I just hate when it's in your face heavy handed imagery. It's too on the nose, and redundant, really.
So, the shift to more mythology over heavy handed Christ allegory is nice.
Obviously the introduction of Batman, and Luthor, plays right into these themes.
Batman's place a man among gods is one of my favourite aspects of the Justice League.
One thing which I think has been ignored, or horribly misunderstood, in the film, which plays into the theme, is the ending of the title fight.
[blackout] While the shared name is the catalyst, it's not, itself, the cause of the "resolution."
It's the empathy that it allows Bruce, to finally humanize the Superman.
It's the juxtaposition of this to Bruce's mini "speech", "you're not a man." "You were never a god." etc. Don't recall the exact wording.
Any who, Bruce's pontificating is, ultimately, for himself. It's part of his rationalization, his attempt to justify himself, by dehumanizing the being he sees before him.
The realization that he has a mother, that he has a life, that he is much more than just his actions, wakes Bruce up from the rage by which he is blinded.
The shared name of their mothers' was merely the coincidence that stopped Bruce, allowing him the chance to open his eyes, and see the man in the 'god' under his boot. [/blackout]
Any who, thought this could be a place to discuss the larger themes, of the film, and the questions it poses.
Many critics claimed that the film raised many heavy questions, but never answered them.
Personally, I think this is only partially true.
I think that plenty of the questions raised are followed through with Bruce's arc, and will continue on through the JL films.
Also, I think that some questions and themes were in fact left unanswered, and that WAS the answer.
It's what sets DC apart from Marvel, and I LOVE that it is in full force in this movie.
What I also love is that it moved from religious allegory, to mythology.
It may seem ironic that I loved this aspect so much, considering I HATED the heavy handed Christ imagery in MOS and Superman Returns.
While I'm fine with the Christ, and Moses parallels in the character, especially considering the obvious inspiration.
I just hate when it's in your face heavy handed imagery. It's too on the nose, and redundant, really.
So, the shift to more mythology over heavy handed Christ allegory is nice.
Obviously the introduction of Batman, and Luthor, plays right into these themes.
Batman's place a man among gods is one of my favourite aspects of the Justice League.
One thing which I think has been ignored, or horribly misunderstood, in the film, which plays into the theme, is the ending of the title fight.
[blackout] While the shared name is the catalyst, it's not, itself, the cause of the "resolution."
It's the empathy that it allows Bruce, to finally humanize the Superman.
It's the juxtaposition of this to Bruce's mini "speech", "you're not a man." "You were never a god." etc. Don't recall the exact wording.
Any who, Bruce's pontificating is, ultimately, for himself. It's part of his rationalization, his attempt to justify himself, by dehumanizing the being he sees before him.
The realization that he has a mother, that he has a life, that he is much more than just his actions, wakes Bruce up from the rage by which he is blinded.
The shared name of their mothers' was merely the coincidence that stopped Bruce, allowing him the chance to open his eyes, and see the man in the 'god' under his boot. [/blackout]
Any who, thought this could be a place to discuss the larger themes, of the film, and the questions it poses.
Many critics claimed that the film raised many heavy questions, but never answered them.
Personally, I think this is only partially true.
I think that plenty of the questions raised are followed through with Bruce's arc, and will continue on through the JL films.
Also, I think that some questions and themes were in fact left unanswered, and that WAS the answer.