GREAT News about DVD 3.1 or 3.5

angel1005

Civilian
Joined
Jul 30, 2006
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Hi everybody

Sorry for the translation, i hope you'll understans what i mean. So this is what i found about a long version of Spider-Man 3 (info from 9/22/2007):

"Spider-Man 3 will stand out (go out again) again in the USA and in Europe, but in its long version!
In knowledge, supplementary 30 minutes would be included in the future DVD which carries (wears) at the moment even no name (Spider-Man 3.5 or Spider-Man 3.1).
The film in long version would be also foreseen (planned) in cinemas for fervants admirers of the araignée.
The long version will go out with the simple version used(wore out), the European will have to as for them wait for The date is not fixed regrettably yet.
Big info:
Mister Raimi would have also asserted that the time foreseen (planned) for the character of Venom would be more than doubled.
So, the dissatisfied which would not have appreciated this character in his (her,its) brief moments of the original version should re-enjoy there."

I hope everyone will understand that !!!

Here's the link for those who speak or understand french :
 
Hi everybody

Sorry for the translation, i hope you'll understans what i mean. So this is what i found about a long version of Spider-Man 3 (info from 9/22/2007):

"Spider-Man 3 will stand out (go out again) again in the USA and in Europe, but in its long version!
In knowledge, supplementary 30 minutes would be included in the future DVD which carries (wears) at the moment even no name (Spider-Man 3.5 or Spider-Man 3.1).
The film in long version would be also foreseen (planned) in cinemas for fervants admirers of the araignée.
The long version will go out with the simple version used(wore out), the European will have to as for them wait for The date is not fixed regrettably yet.
Big info:
Mister Raimi would have also asserted that the time foreseen (planned) for the character of Venom would be more than doubled.
So, the dissatisfied which would not have appreciated this character in his (her,its) brief moments of the original version should re-enjoy there."

I hope everyone will understand that !!!

Here's the link for those who speak or understand french :

looks great but theres no link.
 
Hi everybody

Sorry for the translation, i hope you'll understans what i mean. So this is what i found about a long version of Spider-Man 3 (info from 9/22/2007):

"Spider-Man 3 will stand out (go out again) again in the USA and in Europe, but in its long version!
In knowledge, supplementary 30 minutes would be included in the future DVD which carries (wears) at the moment even no name (Spider-Man 3.5 or Spider-Man 3.1).
The film in long version would be also foreseen (planned) in cinemas for fervants admirers of the araignée.
The long version will go out with the simple version used(wore out), the European will have to as for them wait for The date is not fixed regrettably yet.
Big info:
Mister Raimi would have also asserted that the time foreseen (planned) for the character of Venom would be more than doubled.
So, the dissatisfied which would not have appreciated this character in his (her,its) brief moments of the original version should re-enjoy there."

I hope everyone will understand that !!!

Here's the link for those who speak or understand french :
Link before I decide to get excited...
 
Holy hell, 30 minutes...

Link please! If this is false, then I'll be pissed. If it's true, then it's kind of an odd time: why announce an extended cut 3 weeks before releasing the theatrical version?
 
Hi everybody

Sorry for the translation, i hope you'll understans what i mean. So this is what i found about a long version of Spider-Man 3 (info from 9/22/2007):

"Spider-Man 3 will stand out (go out again) again in the USA and in Europe, but in its long version!
In knowledge, supplementary 30 minutes would be included in the future DVD which carries (wears) at the moment even no name (Spider-Man 3.5 or Spider-Man 3.1).
The film in long version would be also foreseen (planned) in cinemas for fervants admirers of the araignée.
The long version will go out with the simple version used(wore out), the European will have to as for them wait for The date is not fixed regrettably yet.
Big info:
Mister Raimi would have also asserted that the time foreseen (planned) for the character of Venom would be more than doubled.
So, the dissatisfied which would not have appreciated this character in his (her,its) brief moments of the original version should re-enjoy there."

I hope everyone will understand that !!!

Here's the link for those who speak or understand french :
Great news! But this has to be confirmed before we got really excited.
 
I hope its true. more than double Venom's screen time? thats definitely gonna please me.

LINK PLEASE!
 
This would be great if it were true, but with no link it's useless.
 
Yea Im gonna call BS on this. I mean why would a French blog site of all places have this seemingly exclusive info.
ea1489c4.gif
 
Need real proof. Until then...it's just a rumor.
 
OK,

i'm looking for other news :

"According to the New York Times, Spider-Man 3 will stand out(go out again) in the USA in long version (30 minutes more, not unimportant) in the US movies in autumn, and the long version will also go out with the DVD of the original film. Raimi would also have asserted that the time(weather) of Venom has the screen will be more than doubled in him(it) of director cut. We can thus hope to see missing scenes(stages) earlier than planned and not to have to wait for a hypothetical Spider-Man 3.1 in 20 years"

And there is a petition for this director's cut release :

http://uk.rottentomatoes.com/vine/showthread.php?t=555674
 
OK,

i'm looking for other news :

"According to the New York Times, Spider-Man 3 will stand out(go out again) in the USA in long version (30 minutes more, not unimportant) in the US movies in autumn, and the long version will also go out with the DVD of the original film. Raimi would also have asserted that the time(weather) of Venom has the screen will be more than doubled in him(it) of director cut. We can thus hope to see missing scenes(stages) earlier than planned and not to have to wait for a hypothetical Spider-Man 3.1 in 20 years"
The long version? Who the heck even says that? BS :o

And there is a petition for this director's cut release :

http://uk.rottentomatoes.com/vine/showthread.php?t=555674
That pention was started on this board IIRC
 
Just one thing :

"Hope" don't cost anything.

Now if you don't wanna hope that this edition will be release one day, it's your problem.
I just try to find some news and the only thing i read it's some "laughter" :huh::huh:
Hopefully in france we don't react like that.

See ya
 
Just one thing :

"Hope" don't cost anything.

Now if you don't wanna hope that this edition will be release one day, it's your problem.
I just try to find some news and the only thing i read it's some "laughter" :huh::huh:
Hopefully in france we don't react like that.

See ya
:huh:
 
Double Venom screen time... it would be great... but want it proof... real proof...
 
OK,

i'm looking for other news :

"According to the New York Times, Spider-Man 3 will stand out(go out again) in the USA in long version (30 minutes more, not unimportant) in the US movies in autumn, and the long version will also go out with the DVD of the original film. Raimi would also have asserted that the time(weather) of Venom has the screen will be more than doubled in him(it) of director cut. We can thus hope to see missing scenes(stages) earlier than planned and not to have to wait for a hypothetical Spider-Man 3.1 in 20 years"

Am I wrong, or was the NY Times rumor already debunked?
 
Yea I believe it was now that I think about it.
 
Sorry i'm tired aand a little suceptible in this times.
:csad:

If i find others things i'll post.

Have a good afternoon.

++


Can you post the link where NY Times said the "news"? You only posted some blog link
 
I actually signed that petitiion for a director's cut and I think many of you should also.

A director's cut would greatly flesh out the story and maybe show us what Raimi and Co. were really thinking when trying to put the movie together as a whole.
 
I actually signed that petitiion for a director's cut and I think many of you should also.

A director's cut would greatly flesh out the story and maybe show us what Raimi and Co. were really thinking when trying to put the movie together as a whole.

the reason I'm not signing is because Sony is likely NOT going to receive or read the petition. Online petitions almost never work. they are more of a list of people who agree to an issue but it really isn't going to do a lot.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"