BatmanVSuperman
Gothopolis
- Joined
- May 22, 2014
- Messages
- 7,952
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Which was the better film in your opinion?
Green Lantern.
Superman Returns might look like a better film, but the story really wasn't any better. People can complain about a turd cloud being the main villain and Hal Jordan being an unlikable *****e, but I fail to understand how Lex Luthor's moronic "grow an island in the middle of the ocean and sell real estate on it after I kill half the people in the United States" plot and a Superman with no personality are any better.
How anyone can say SR is better than Man of Steel is beyond me. At least in MOS, Superman was ****ing character in his own movie, and not a dues ex machina who is just there to lift giant objects whenever it's convenient. But I guess that's another debate.
Agreed ! SR might look better, but it's really not. GL at least only craps on a mythology that the general public aren't that well acquainted with.
It's stupid but mildly entertaining, with a couple of good performances (sadly, not by anyone in a leading role, ugh ! Blake Lively was the worst love interest ever). Still, it doesn't make us go away with a foul taste in our mouths when we think about GL in general. There are a couple of funny moments, and a few reasonable special effects.
In comparison SR ****s all over not only an iconic character, but manages to also tarnish Superman the Movie, by rehashing everything wrong with it, then adding a few little turds of its own, and leaving out everthing that made the 1978 film a classic -like fun, or charm, or good acting, or action, or suspense, or .....you see where I'm going with this.
( In terms of , Superman is the ultimate Deus ex machina in Superman the movie but it still works because the filmmakers were smart enough to give him a personality, and actually have the film be about him. SR is some extended cameos of Superman getting his ass kicked and lifting stuff. Curse you Brian Singer !)
Agreed x100. An 'iconic' ending to be sure, (and also lifted from a comic panel if I recall correctly), but a bad one nonetheless. No matter the threat or consequence, the viewer knows Superman just has to get angry, fly around the planet at speed and hey presto, all fixed.The ending of Superman the Movie doesn't work at all and is a shocker with regards to Deus ex machina. That movie should be shown to all budding screen writers how NOT to end a movie. They (essentially) do the same thing in Superman 2. Lazy writing at its worst.
Agreed x100. An 'iconic' ending to be sure, (and also lifted from a comic panel if I recall correctly), but a bad one nonetheless. No matter the threat or consequence, the viewer knows Superman just has to get angry, fly around the planet at speed and hey presto, all fixed.
Green Lantern was terrible in ways I didn't know it was possible to be terrible in for this day and age. Even just shot-to-shot... it was amateur hour. Most (again, most) of Superman Returns problems come from the script. Green Lantern's come from everything.
The ending of Superman the Movie doesn't work at all and is a shocker with regards to Deus ex machina. That movie should be shown to all budding screen writers how NOT to end a movie. They (essentially) do the same thing in Superman 2. Lazy writing at its worst.
Superman Returns was far superior. Superman Returns is a good film and IMO better then Man of Steel in terms of story and storytelling.
Rewatch Superman 1, Superman 2, and then Returns. It really improves Returns and you can see Returns works.
Only problem IMO with Returns is the Superkid but still it was good. Green Lantern was not.
Superman Returns was far superior. Superman Returns is a good film and IMO better then Man of Steel in terms of story and storytelling.
Rewatch Superman 1, Superman 2, and then Returns. It really improves Returns and you can see Returns works.
Only problem IMO with Returns is the Superkid but still it was good. Green Lantern was not.