Mr. Peanut
Sidekick
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2017
- Messages
- 1,221
- Reaction score
- 929
- Points
- 73
That list shows other studios though. Also there can't be just 20 successful franchises. If the previous Indiana Jones movies weren't successful as a whole, Disney wouldn't have moved forward with a 5th film with the same lead actor. The 4th Indy film was successful when it came out in 2008. The people in charge just didn't fast track a 5th film. If Disney had Indy in 2008, there would have been Indy 5 much sooner,and probably an Indy 6 as well.Hmm I don't see Indiana Jones on this list...
View attachment 122661
I do see Avatar and Pirates of the Caribbean though...but hey, if Ford's doing CGI characters now maybe he can go for a blue one next time.
That list shows other studios though. Also there can't be just 20 successful franchises. If the previous Indiana Jones movies weren't successful as a whole, Disney wouldn't have moved forward with a 5th film with the same lead actor. The 4th Indy film was successful when it came out in 2008. The people in charge just didn't fast track a 5th film. If Disney had Indy in 2008, there would have been Indy 5 much sooner,and probably an Indy 6 as well.
I literally meant 3 big live action movie franchises, in which Harrison Ford is included. I didn't label Marvel/Star Wars/Indiana Jones as the big three of Disney. Surely Pixar and their animation studio are much more lucrative than Indiana Jones. I didn't even think about their other live action movie franchises like Avatar/Pirates when I typed that post, last year.But you said "Disney's 3 big live action movie franchises". That makes it sound like you meant that the MCU, Star Wars, and Indiana Jones are the top three live action Disney Franchises.
Maybe what you actually meant was "three of Disney's big live action movie franchises".
I literally meant 3 big live action movie franchises, in which Harrison Ford is included. I didn't label Marvel/Star Wars/Indiana Jones as the big three of Disney. Surely Pixar and their animation studio are much more lucrative than Indiana Jones. I didn't even think about their other live action movie franchises like Avatar/Pirates when I typed that post, last year.
I already explained this last year.I didn't say its Disney's THE big 3. Its 3 big ips but I didn't say its Disney's biggest 3. Indiana Jones might not have the same success in Disney compare to the Paramount days, but the previous films are owned by Disney now. So the legacy of Indy is with Disney right now.
For the big 3 live action franchises of Disney, I might consider Pirates of the Caribbean as the third one?
I already explained this last year.
What happened to the last president outlawing all aliens?
I liked Ford's Ross but the character seemed too pleasant/nice to be in line with the version we've had to date.
I think we have toso, was the "*" in the Thunderbolts* title.... an even the "we can't call ourselves that" line the newest trailer (which ironically played before the movie, for me) a hint/spoiler to Ross's faith in the movie
not that the marketing for the movie itself was exactly trying to hide it , with Red Hulk front and center
(but, we didn't necessarily know end result/or if he would've been redeemed/ or died)
or is the "Thunderbolt" name unrelated???
there was a team of that name in comics that was unrelated, yes...FWIW, the name is a coincidence in the comics.
Sure, but the Thunderbolts* line up is not even faithful to the comics. They could have chosen another name, yet they went with Thunderbolts*.FWIW, the name is a coincidence in the comics.