Hollywood's May melee

matrix_ghost

movie fan
Joined
Aug 19, 2004
Messages
5,585
Reaction score
3
Points
58
http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118004580.html?categoryid=13&cs=1

Hollywood's May melee
Big-budget blitz leaves industry gasping for air
By PAMELA MCCLINTOCK

Last year, before "The Dark Knight" opened July 18, some pundits clucked their tongues at Warner Bros.' decision to open the film so "late" in the summer.
The film went on to gross $1 billion -- vaulting it into the record books -- but it wasn't enough to change Hollywood's earlier-is-better mentality. And the biz is paying a penalty for that mindset this year.

Summer doesn't officially start until June 21, but the majority of Hollywood's big-budget f/x-heavy tentpoles have already opened. The studios' eagerness to grab early playdates led to six such pics bowing in May, while the rest of the summer sees only three or four more.

The good news: The remainder of the studios' slates demonstrate their increasing diversity in summer fare, with releases ranging from comedies to gangster movies.

The bad news: Even though five of the six May films did well, they would have done better if they'd had more breathing room. And that sends up warning signals about Hollywood's stubborn reluctance to spread the wealth, calendar-wise.

Hollywood execs are realizing that they'd better change their thinking before next summer, because the top-heavy summer is taking a toll.

May had three fanboy movies (Fox's "X-Men Origins: Wolverine," Paramount's "Star Trek" and Warner Bros.' "Terminator Salvation"), two family films (Fox's "A Night at the Museum: Battle for the Smithsonian" and Disney-Pixar's "Up") and one thriller ("Angels and Demons").

Only "Terminator" could be classified as a disappointment, but all six films had to share a box office tally that is finite. The month brought in $1 billion, which is roughly the same amount as the $987 million in May 2008. Last year, May tentpoles "Iron Man" and "Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull" grossed north of $300 million in North America alone. No May 2009 event title will reach those heights in North America.

The crowded pipeline also is having an impact on the foreign B.O.

"In the end, it works against us all," one top studio exec says.

The amassing of so many tentpoles in May points to the perilous business of dating big-budget event pics so far in advance. Whether due to tradition or a desire to play it safe, Hollywood has yet to turn the box office into a truly year-round business.

Instead, the studios continue to depend heavily on summer.

Franchises are huge engine-drivers for the majors because of the various revenue streams they create. But they cost plenty to produce and market, and need big returns at the worldwide box office.

Studios began releasing their big-budget tentpoles earlier and earlier in May to be the first out of the gate, even though most kids aren't out of school until June.The migration began more than a decade ago, culminating with the blockbuster openings of "Spider-Man 3," "Shrek the Third" and "Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End" in May 2007.

But the advantage of going in May has begun to evaporate. This year, it's the three June and July event pics -- "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen," "Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs" and "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince" -- that have room to maneuver.

When studios began dating their 2009 summer tentpoles in late 2007, no one intended such a crush in May. And by the time they realized what was happening, it was too late to change, or they simply opted to stay put.

"Star Trek," for example, was originally set to open in late December 2008. But Paramount pushed the release to May 8, 2009, even though Fox had already dated "Wolverine" for May 1.Fox said in December 2007 that it would release "Museum 2" over Memorial Day weekend in 2009 -- a major seasonal shift, since the first "Night at the Museum" opened over Christmas 2006. But Fox thought it had Memorial Day weekend to itself -- at least until Warner Bros. said it would open "Terminator Salvation" then as well.

The May crunch resulted in three fanboy-oriented pics bowing within four weeks of each other. The trio also had to compete for attention with Sony's "Angels and Demons," which opened May 15, as well as "Museum 2," and there's only so much love to spread around.

In addition to having to share the Memorial Day frame with "T4," "Museum 2" faced direct competition a week later from Disney-Pixar's "Up."

The Mouse House had originally set "Up" to debut June 12, but then moved the opening to May 29. A big reason was to give the 3-D toon some time to play before Fox's 3-D animated "Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs" goes into theaters July 1. There's still just a limited number of 3-D screens, so Disney erred on the side of caution.

Creating some elbow room also could explain why Warners decided to open "T4" when it did, instead of one or two weekends later, as Par's "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen" opens June 24.

But at what cost?

"Movies -- every movie -- needs a chance to run. You get slaughtered otherwise," one distribution topper says.

There is little doubt that the May pileup has depressed grosses for each of the event pics. Domestic B.O. revenues for May ran slightly ahead of last year's; the difference is, there were more mouths to feed.

Last year, Par's May release "Iron Man" cumed $582 million worldwide. Par's "Star Trek," which has been just as well received, will likely top out at $235 million domestically and $125 million overseas for a total of $360 million. That's still a bonanza, but the profit margins will be less.

"Wolverine" has grossed $171.6 million overseas for a worldwide total of $343 million to date. That's more than enough to keep the lucrative franchise alive, and well north of the worldwide total of the first "X-Men" pic. The last two "X-Men" films, however, each grossed north of $400 million worldwide, and box observers say the film's take was definitely cut into by "Star Trek."

"Museum 2" is still early in its run, but like "Wolverine," could see its worldwide pot diminished to some degree by having competition so quickly from "Up." In its first 10 days, "Museum 2" cumed an impressive $200 million worldwide, but the pic won't come close to matching the $574.5 million grossed globally by the original.

Sony's "Angels" has taken up much of the oxygen at the foreign box office, grossing north of $252 million overseas since it opened May 15. Domestically, the sequel has had a tougher time.

After "Transformers" bows June 26, there are no established action tentpoles left to open, underscoring again how top-heavy May was with fanboy titles. So "Transformers" likely will have an easy road, since it will only have "Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince" to contend with. And the Potter pic doesn't open until nearly three weeks later, on July 15.

Studios have become more willing in the past several years to bow mid-size films in off-peak months.

They have even more incentive now. The remarkably strong first four months of the year saw films like "Taken" and "Fast and Furious" do summertime business, even though they cost far less to produce.

Sony and Universal are taking a chance in deciding to open two drama actioners in June and July, "The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3' (June 12) and "Public Enemies" (July 1), respectively. Historically, such films usually wait until fall.

The idea in opening "Pelham" and "Public Enemies" in summer is to offer an alternative to popcorn pics, family fare and a number of comedies. Such counterprogamming has generally been the purview of indie companies and studio specialty arms.

And with the runaway success of "The Devil Wears Prada," studio romantic comedies have become something of a summer staple.

As for future summer calendars, Par has hopes of turning "G.I. Joe," which it opens on Aug. 7, into a new franchise. Time will tell whether it gains a toehold this summer and beyond.



You'd think that Hollywood would learn their lesson with the May releases of 2007 when POTC 3 , Shrek 3 , SPider-man 3 duked it out.


HOwever MAy 2010 will have
Iron MAn 2 , Shrek 4 , Prince Of Persia and Robin Hood.
*shakes head*
 
I think that the only really, really stupid thing the studios did this May was releasing MATM2 and T4 on the same weekend.

Also Trek has a shot at reaching 245mil. It could end with 235mil but I still think that it could make more.

Again Regarding Star Trek; All the previous Trek movies did pretty piss poor numbers overseas so 125mil is actually a good number for it to reach. Because people actually liked it, the real money for Trek will be in the DVD sales and the sequel that grosses over 300mil domestically.

As for Wolverine I think no matter what it was destined to make as much as it did. The X-men series just isn't as big as alot of people want it to be. But it's still obviously a highly successful series so i'm not knocking it.

I understand what the article is saying but I think that it is foolish to lay all those movies boxoffice grosses on the feet of their competition.
 
Last edited:
well I guess I can understand the Museum 2 and T4 competition. The Memorial Day weekend was open so Museum 2 decided to go there. then T4 went there soon after. It was stupid of T4 to move their date but I guess they weren't expecting the movie to bomb as much as it did.
 
The decision to release Night At The Museum 2 in the summer when the first one proved to do so well in the winter still kind of baffles me. Over here distributors were smart enough to release Terminator two weeks after Museum 2 which gives both a better chance of success.

Too many tentpole movies are been released in the same month and basically canceling each other out. I'm glad that some studios had the foresight to move away from the summer season for things like Fast & Furious and Monsters vs Aliens.
You'd think that Hollywood would learn their lesson with the May releases of 2007 when POTC 3 , Shrek 3 , SPider-man 3 duked it out.


HOwever MAy 2010 will have
Iron MAn 2 , Shrek 4 , Prince Of Persia and Robin Hood.
*shakes head*

And the Sex and the City sequel too.:o It's not exactly my cup of tea but as the show and the first movie proves it's got a huge built-in fanbase.
 
Fast and Furious 2, Monsters and Aliens and Taken all did quite well in the Spring this year, as did Mall Cop (why?) and I Love You Man. Watchmen did okay in March and it was almost big enough to be a summer movie (it is just the source material apparently doomed it to a limited audience). I think we'll see more movies moving towards early April and late/mid March.


Also, Paramount and Marvel are pushing it even earlier by being the first summer movie (Iron Man 2) that kicks off the summer IN APRIL. That is ridiculous.
 
I kinda suspected that releasing so many tentpole movies so close together would bite them in the butt. They definitely need to spread things apart. I always felt like that was common sense, but I guess Hollywood doesn't use that.
 
i do agree that all the top summer movies (for me) came out in May, which now im not looking forward to June and July movies (just thin air) until August when District 9 comes out when it starts until Avatar comes out in the end of the year
 
Hollywood? common sense? those words don't go together!!
 
are they crazy or what? well its their money. good luck.


Studios always tend to focus on dates that have proved succesfully to them in the past.
Remember that Iron Man also came out in May of '08 and despite the competition still managed to hit 300 million in the US.





The decision to release Night At The Museum 2 in the summer when the first one proved to do so well in the winter still kind of baffles me. Over here distributors were smart enough to release Terminator two weeks after Museum 2 which gives both a better chance of success.

Too many tentpole movies are been released in the same month and basically canceling each other out. I'm glad that some studios had the foresight to move away from the summer season for things like Fast & Furious and Monsters vs Aliens.


And the Sex and the City sequel too.:o It's not exactly my cup of tea but as the show and the first movie proves it's got a huge built-in fanbase.

Ja Ja i get ya. I dunno if you could call it a smart move of the distributers but Angels & Demons and "T:S are distributed by Sony in foreign markets. Because A&D would perform better , SOny wisely decided for a early start . That way both their franchises would make enough $$$.


Personally i think that studios really need to look at the amount of movies they want to release . It's the big budget blockbusters that tend to underperform because of massive competition .
 
Studios always tend to focus on dates that have proved succesfully to them in the past.
Remember that Iron Man also came out in May of '08 and despite the competition still managed to hit 300 million in the US.

Which just shows that if you're making a movie that generate a lot of positive buzz it doesn't matter when you release it. The real problem with Terminator Salvation and a few other of the May-releases this year is that they are crap or mediocre movies, not that they were released in a crowded month
 
You'd think that Hollywood would learn their lesson with the May releases of 2007 when POTC 3 , Shrek 3 , SPider-man 3 duked it out.

HOwever MAy 2010 will have
Iron MAn 2 , Shrek 4 , Prince Of Persia and Robin Hood.
*shakes head*
Umm...

POTC3
Total US Gross $309,420,425
International Gross $651,576,067
Worldwide Gross $960,996,492

Shrek 3
Total US Gross $322,719,944
International Gross $476,238,218
Worldwide Gross $798,958,162

SM3
Total US Gross $336,530,303
International Gross $554,341,323
Worldwide Gross $890,871,626

Those movies did just fine. I can't imagine them faring any better on the box office front. What the studios apparently can't see is the films they released this year were crap and/or failed to live up to expectations.

Event movies are unharmed any cramming. So are sequels to massively popular films. Given that word of mouth doesn't completely destroy viewership, of course.

You can't expect to reap rewards from products that not many people like.
 
What competition did Iron Man have though?

I think they should start spreading this summer movies out definitely. Why release your movie in a month that has like, 5 other relatively big movies in it? The summer is made up of at least 4 months, use them.
 
if there would be 4 blockbusters in the same week i would watch them all. but it would be better if they were every 2 week .
 
What competition did Iron Man have though?

I think they should start spreading this summer movies out definitely. Why release your movie in a month that has like, 5 other relatively big movies in it? The summer is made up of at least 4 months, use them.

Or why mot using other months outside of summer. If movies like Paul Blart and Taken can make close to $150 million with a release in January, for example, why shouldn't more anticipated franchise-movies be able to do a lot of money if they were released then?
 
Yea, why is summer the big thing? I would of thought winter would be the big movie season. I mean, when it's nice and sunny outside, why go indoors to watch a movie?
 
Yea, why is summer the big thing? I would of thought winter would be the big movie season. I mean, when it's nice and sunny outside, why go indoors to watch a movie?

The funny thing is that before Jaws and Star Wars in the 70's, the summer was more like a graveyard.
 
Ahh see I'm too young to remember that ;)

But yea it is strange. WE NEED MORE BIG WINTER MOVIES!!!
 
Yea, why is summer the big thing? I would of thought winter would be the big movie season. I mean, when it's nice and sunny outside, why go indoors to watch a movie?
some people are saying because kids dont have school.
then why may?

i think people are now expecting huge movies in summer. my friends always ask me what movies come out in summer. so they are wauting only for summer.
 
Which just shows that if you're making a movie that generate a lot of positive buzz it doesn't matter when you release it. The real problem with Terminator Salvation and a few other of the May-releases this year is that they are crap or mediocre movies, not that they were released in a crowded month

Yeah, here's the real problem, but Hollywood will never admit that, blame DVD, blame pirated/downloaded movies, blame overcrowding of the box office, but never blame the movie just sucking. Look at the movies;

Wolverine - This movie was just bad, plain and simple, got very poor word of mouth and the big first weekend drop off proved it.
Star Trek - It was never gonna be as big as Iron Man, it had the stigma of being a Star Trek movie, which the general public associates with uber-geeks. I think JJ Abrams being attached helped the b.o. performance and helped wash away some of the stigma though, a sequel would probably do real well
Angels & Demons - Well, most of the general public disliked Da Vinci Code, still don't understand that, since it was the book on film. So you've got that going against you, plus A&D was the lesser known Langdon book.
Terminator - Another movie that got bad word of mouth. I was interested in seeing it, but after the bad word of mouth, I'll wait for DVD
Night at the Muesum - Ok, this one probably would've benefited from a November or December release, seems like the type of film that belongs to the Christmas season
Up - Doing great, had only a 35% drop in it's second weekend.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"