BH/HHH
You Are My World
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2004
- Messages
- 30,113
- Reaction score
- 916
- Points
- 78
I know we've discussed this to death in both the Bad Blood and JL vs the Titans threads but given they aren't the place for it I think it's best to have a place to discuss it separately.
I think it's fair to say that many of us haven't been happy with the JL Animated movies post Flashpoint. It started with Justice League War going the New 52 route and since we have had nothing but JL films and Batman films set in the new universe (with few exceptions, JL: Gods and Monsters, Batman Assault on Arkham).
I know the ones that sell most are the Batman ones followed by the Justice League properties. But they really haven't helped to sell other heroes like they have Batman and the Justice League.
Whilst Superman had been treated to several adaptations prior to Flashpoint I really still feel he got the shaft at times. Superman vs the Elite, whilst a great animated film had some really poor character designs that from many comments I've read are what turned people off the film. They then followed it up with Superman Unbound (which I like a lot) but even that had a strange design for Superman for many. I really feel like they dropped the ball so bad with the designs on Elite that Superman suffered as a result. Why was this allowed to happen? Compare the designs on Elite and Unbound to All Star Superman. All Star was of course more a straight up adaptation than either of those two. But still why wasn't there an effort to make them at least more like the comics than the choices they made? Stan Smith Superman is just a horrendous choice.
Then there's Green Lantern, who I feel suffered worst if all. Whilst First a Flight was a good animated film and was successful. They followed that up with Green Lantern Emerald Knights, which was abut if a train wreck (IMO). I don't understand how or why they did this? Gotham Knight whilst a successful film sales wise was met with mixed reactions. Did they not learn from this?...
And onto Wonder Woman, who received a terrific animated film yet because sakes weren't great she was dropped. Could they not have used her as a co-lead for something as they did with the Superman Batman titles?
Speaking of the Superman Batman titles, why didn't they ever do anymore of those? You'd have thought they'd have had a Superman Batman movie or better yet a Trinity movie out in time for the release of Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice.
I get that the Batman ones are the big sellers but as I've said why not then have Batman team up with another hero or two? You've still got a Batman title and he will still be a lead in the movie. They need to give other heroes more of a chance to break out.
The decision to keep everything in continuity is another choice I find bizarre. The reason the other movies were so good was they were different, they had variety to them. Give us back that variety.
I also worry about the over exposure of Batman in these films and elsewhere. He's an amazing character but like with everything you can do to much with a character and people will eventually turn off from it.
I think the best things they can do now is, get away form what they are currently doing. Bring back 1 or 2 straight up adaptations a year, an original movie and a Batman one where he teams up with another hero. Of course been more of a Superman fan I would want some Superman ones again but I'm not convinced they'll do that.
Why can't they even do some shorts like they did, I know the individual disc collecting the shorts wasn't a huge seller. But why can't they give us a shorter movie and a 10-20 minute short along with it. That way we can also get variety on these projects.
My big hope is that shows like the Flash, Arrow etc and the DCEU give other characters more exposure to allow them to risk doing an animated project on them.
I guarantee if they keep doing what they are doing then eventually people will stop buying them.
I think it's fair to say that many of us haven't been happy with the JL Animated movies post Flashpoint. It started with Justice League War going the New 52 route and since we have had nothing but JL films and Batman films set in the new universe (with few exceptions, JL: Gods and Monsters, Batman Assault on Arkham).
I know the ones that sell most are the Batman ones followed by the Justice League properties. But they really haven't helped to sell other heroes like they have Batman and the Justice League.
Whilst Superman had been treated to several adaptations prior to Flashpoint I really still feel he got the shaft at times. Superman vs the Elite, whilst a great animated film had some really poor character designs that from many comments I've read are what turned people off the film. They then followed it up with Superman Unbound (which I like a lot) but even that had a strange design for Superman for many. I really feel like they dropped the ball so bad with the designs on Elite that Superman suffered as a result. Why was this allowed to happen? Compare the designs on Elite and Unbound to All Star Superman. All Star was of course more a straight up adaptation than either of those two. But still why wasn't there an effort to make them at least more like the comics than the choices they made? Stan Smith Superman is just a horrendous choice.
Then there's Green Lantern, who I feel suffered worst if all. Whilst First a Flight was a good animated film and was successful. They followed that up with Green Lantern Emerald Knights, which was abut if a train wreck (IMO). I don't understand how or why they did this? Gotham Knight whilst a successful film sales wise was met with mixed reactions. Did they not learn from this?...
And onto Wonder Woman, who received a terrific animated film yet because sakes weren't great she was dropped. Could they not have used her as a co-lead for something as they did with the Superman Batman titles?
Speaking of the Superman Batman titles, why didn't they ever do anymore of those? You'd have thought they'd have had a Superman Batman movie or better yet a Trinity movie out in time for the release of Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice.
I get that the Batman ones are the big sellers but as I've said why not then have Batman team up with another hero or two? You've still got a Batman title and he will still be a lead in the movie. They need to give other heroes more of a chance to break out.
The decision to keep everything in continuity is another choice I find bizarre. The reason the other movies were so good was they were different, they had variety to them. Give us back that variety.
I also worry about the over exposure of Batman in these films and elsewhere. He's an amazing character but like with everything you can do to much with a character and people will eventually turn off from it.
I think the best things they can do now is, get away form what they are currently doing. Bring back 1 or 2 straight up adaptations a year, an original movie and a Batman one where he teams up with another hero. Of course been more of a Superman fan I would want some Superman ones again but I'm not convinced they'll do that.
Why can't they even do some shorts like they did, I know the individual disc collecting the shorts wasn't a huge seller. But why can't they give us a shorter movie and a 10-20 minute short along with it. That way we can also get variety on these projects.
My big hope is that shows like the Flash, Arrow etc and the DCEU give other characters more exposure to allow them to risk doing an animated project on them.
I guarantee if they keep doing what they are doing then eventually people will stop buying them.