Kane said:Ya um thats reading way too deep into it.
Superman boldly sacrificed himself to save everyone (not even knowing he had a son)....to save the world.
He was a true man and the film showed that men like him and Richard should be positive figures for inspiring positive ideals.
Jor-El also proved to be a loving father who helped make Kal-El what he is today (as did Jonathan in the vague past).
Whack Arnolds said:Yeah, everyone in my theatre couldn't wait for it to end...and we're making mad amounts of jokes. Stupid plot line.
Katsuro said:Nothing's worse than when people project their own opinions of a movie onto the audience around them.
I just find it funny that apparently everyone who loved this movie and everyone who hated it were all in seperate theaters.
buggs0268 said:I posted this in the review thread, but the opening titels. The CGI planets and all that looked too cgi, and not as realistic as the same thing the same company did 9 years ago in Contact. And the blue Zooming titles did not look as good as STM's version. STMS version looked more 3D and had white hithlights giving it that 3D look. This one didnt look as good and I figured that was the one thing that would really look good. When I heard it was in the movie, I thought "kick ass. yeah."
That is what it seemed to me too. But somehow the impression I get is that it wasn't supposed to be that way. The one ins STM gav eit a grandness/bigness. this kind of did the oposite.. I also thing the actual titles themselbes were not as good as the ones in STM. The looked more 3D in that one. I was so looking forward to this one thing, and when i saw them I was like "Here they come..here they..,.huh?"Mentok said:I gotta agree with you there Buggs. Too CGI... I got the impression that it was ment to be half realistic half cartoony?
I dont know, maybe that was just me.
Whack Arnolds said:Superman Returns sucked more than Monica Lewinski.
Whack Arnolds said:Superman Returns sucked more than Monica Lewinski.