Sequels If I would've been in charge of the X-Men series, this would've been the rosters...

Julio Alejandro

Sidekick
Joined
Aug 11, 2008
Messages
1,310
Reaction score
1
Points
31
...and enemies.

X-Men:

*Cyclops
*Jean
*Beast
*Angel
*Iceman

Enemies:

*Magneto
*Toad
*Mastermind (He could possibly be replaced with another villain, since no one really cared much for him.)
*Quicksilver
*Scarlet Witch

Yes, the originals.

X-Men 2 adds:

*Wolverine
*Storm
*Colossus
*Nighcrawler
*Banshee

Enemies:

*Magneto
*Toad
*Juggernaut
*Blob

Quicksilver & Scarlet Witch turn on Magneto.

Phoenix has taken over Jean.

X-Men 3:

Beast, Banshee & Iceman have left, Angel is thought to be dead at the end and are replaced with:

*Rogue
*Kitty
*Havok

Enemies:

*Magneto
*Sinister
*Phoenix
*Sabretooth
*Mystique
*Pyro

X-Men 4:

Havok, Kitty. Nightcrawler & Colossus are gone, and are replaced with:

*Gambit
*Psylocke
*Jubilee

Enemies:

*Apocalypse
*Bolivar Trask & The Sentinels
*The Horsemen, including Archangel as Death (Who later rejoins the X-Men)

Sidenote: Magneto, like Archangel is in between sides.
 
Perhaps not (it's debatable), but he did choose the right characters. Having Storm and Wolverine (along with Cyclops and Jean) on the active team was an essential move since those four are the most iconic/recognizable members of the team on par with Xavier.
 
If that was the case, he would've had all the original X-Men along with the animated series team.
 
Doubtful. Production probably didn't incorporate those characters as a means of introduction for the same reason Marvel hasn't in any media since they almost drove the book into cancellation.
 
Well the original X-Men comics had way more problems then just the line up. And Marvel still goes back to the original line up plenty of times, so there is an appeal there. People bring up the cancellation of the original comics but don't bring up X-Factor, X-Men: The Hidden Years, X-Men: First Class, etc.

But I agree Singer made the right choice with incorporating Storm and Wolverine. The two main original X-Men with the two main "new" X-Men. The only thing was he could have hinted more at the original team. Like by making Bobby not a student.
 
You have to remember, Singer had no prior knowledge of the X-Men comics.

By the way, I'm still a fan of the original X-Factor series. it's one of my all-time favorite comics.
 
No offense but your verson of how you would do the x-men would suck, Sorry no offensive, i can see where you going with it but the progression of the story plus adding those new characters after each movie would live the audiance confused, the story needed to be Wolverine heavy for two reason... 1. Wolverine is probably Theee face of X-Men world right now and 2. Wolverine became a vehicle to tell the x-men stories, so really the whole franchise is basically his world, thats why it was warrant that we needed a wolverine spinn off.

I dont agree with some aspects of Singers verson of the x-men, or what fox did for the last stand, i dont blame Brett Ratner, he is a good director just fox needed a yes man to make the third movie because they couldnt of waited for Singer, in all reality they should of waited for singer, and as for Ratner as a yes man i dont necessarly mean it like that, Ratner is a hugh x-men fan, probably more so than Bryan Singer... Anyone whose a fan of x-men would pretty much say yes to directing it...

Now that i have that said, This is how i feel the movieverse should of introduced characters...

Lets look at X-Men 1...

Primarly it was correct but i think Storm shouldnt of been in it. Because of budget cuts certain characters were dropped for easy simulated power characters to replace them. It would be easy to make Storm who looks human with a white wig than a blue fured beast.

Saying that this is how my x-men 1 would be been casted...

As X-Men
---------
Professor X
Cyclops
Jean
Beast

As students at the school
-------------------------
Iceman - On the verge of becoming an x-men
Colossus
Shadow Cat
Pyro
Jubilee

Other Mutants
--------------
Angel
Storm - who kind of takes the role Rogue had in a sense.

Brotherhood
------------
Magneto
Mystique
Blob
Toad
Avalanche

The story would pretty much of been the same except for a few fundemental differences. 1. Magneto is after Storm to control his devince as it needs a mutant electrical energy to power it, Magneto sends Blob and Avalanche to get her, Storm has fled to america because of her powers and ends up discovering Wolverine in a bar, 2. When Xavier discusses with Wolverine about the X-Men. We learn that Angel was once an x-men but discovered he had more power in the political world because of his family status and wealth. So if your looking for a comparrision, Angel has taken a role, like what Beast had in X-Men last stand. Beast in my verson would be a the x-mens Doctor with Jean Grey assisting him. 3. Iceman is one of the students who is on the verge of joinging the x-men, however Pyro becomes jealous of this, and we learn of the rivially between the two. The rest of the movie would play out the same except, Sabretooth would not appear in his place Avalanche will be on par with the fighting but by the end of the movie we learn that Magneto is captured along with Toad. Mystique Avalanche and Blob manage to escape. 4. Storm replacing Rogue's role, however Storm would still be played by Halle Berry and her role would of been more senor. She is unsure of this world but Xavier offers a place to teach her culture to his students. in return Xavier will help her control her abilities.

X-Men 2
By time of this movie again the story would of played out the same but like with the second genisus you would see more of those characters and we learn more of wolverines past and the origins of the original brotherhood.

Cast

X-Men
------
Professor X
Cyclops
Jean Grey
Storm
Wolverine
Iceman

Students
---------
Colossus
Shadow Cat
Jubilee
Pyro

Brotherhood
------------
Magneto - after escape
Mystique
Blob
Avalanche
Pyro - is converted

Strykers team
-------------
Nightcralwer
Rogue
Sabretooth
Banshee
Deathstrike
Jason Wyngaurde

From this we learn the following, Stryker is still experimenting on mutants, Rogue, Sabretooth, Banshee, Deathstrike and Jason Wyngaurde are all controlled members. Jason is Masterminder but also Strykers son... in my verson of x-men 2, Mastermind was one of Magneto's original brotherhood members and during Magneto's original assult pre-x-men 1, Stryker recaptures his son and uses him to control the other members of his elite team. Again the story seems to go the same path with Pyro joing the brotherhood, professor x being used to go against humans, the only difference is Rogue's appearance would of been simulare to that of the 90's cartoon and she would be given the powers of super strength and flight we we learn comes from other mutants stryker had at the weapon x facility at alkali lake. Rogue, Banshee, is rescued by the x-men with Nigthcrawler who wants to help his friends. But Deathstrike and Sabretooth is killed, well Deathstrike is but Sabretooth your left wondering. It would also end with the same Jean Grey dying scene.

X-Men 3 would then form round into becoming like the cartoon series.

The x-men now consist of
Professor X
Cyclops
Storm
Wolverine
Rogue
Iceman

Students in the school
---------------------
Colossus
Shadow Cat
Banshee
Nightcrawler

Other mutants
-------------
Angel/Archangel
Gambit
Mr Sinister

Brotherhood
------------
Magneto
Mystique
Blob
Avalanche
Pyro
and a whole load of Morlocks working alongside the brotherhood.

Same story but the movie would of have four chaptures instead of 2 and half, alcatraz wouldnt of been how the movie ended, instead that would be the start, after magneto traches the place and free all the prisoned mutants the group go on a riot towards the mainlands to fight the humans, but the x-men stop them. Sinister would be introduced as the person who created the cure as a means to rid the world of evolutionary mistakes, he refers to the morlocks but the goverment uses the cure on all mutants, Knowing this Mr Sinister starts working on the legacy virus, Gambit is introcued as one of his lackies but joins the x-men after realising Mr Sinister is a madman, Magneto is an egotist and to repent for what he has down he must join the x-men.
 
Ratner is a hugh x-men fan, probably more so than Bryan Singer
Probably?!!! Singer wasn't an X-Men fan at all! Just watch the interview on the X-Men DVD.

By the way, you're basically just doing the same as they already did, just switching around a few characters.
 
Well the original X-Men comics had way more problems then just the line up. And Marvel still goes back to the original line up plenty of times, so there is an appeal there. People bring up the cancellation of the original comics but don't bring up X-Factor, X-Men: The Hidden Years, X-Men: First Class, etc.

The appeal is by hardcore fans. For the mass audience, they aren't too familiar or attached to the original team.

But I agree Singer made the right choice with incorporating Storm and Wolverine. The two main original X-Men with the two main "new" X-Men. The only thing was he could have hinted more at the original team. Like by making Bobby not a student.[/quote]

Perhaps. But I think it was deliberate as part of the Iceman/Pyro dynamic.
 
I honestly don't have a problem with Storm & Wolverine being in the first movie for that very reason, but from a fan's POV, it would've been cool to start with the original 5, introduce Storm & Wolvie in 2, give Wolvie a spinoff afterward and make Storm the leader in 3.
 
Thats because the story was petty much good but there approach with the characters were wrong, thats just my opinion, if they did the characters the way i suggested alot more fans would of been happier with it.
 
What was so different about yours from the movie? You only made subtle changes.
 
The story was ok... but the characters were messed up for that story, plus fans would of wanted to see canoncity as much as possible.

If the story was retold with the characters changed around slightly it would of been a billion times better.
 
OK. That I can agree with. I think the first X-Men movie was too fooled around with.
 
I also think the phoenix saga was not needed for the story to continue, they basically cut it sure with withat story.
 
I think the Phoenix Saga should've been intertwined with an Apocalypse story where ll hell breaks loose.
 
X1

X-Men
-Professor X
-Cyclops
-Jean
-Storm
-Beast
-Wolverine
-Iceman

Cameos
-Kitty
-Colossus
-Jubilee
-Angel

Villains
-Magneto
-Mystique
-Pyro
-Toad
-Blob
-Avalanche

X2

X-Men
-The same as the first team with a smaller role for Beast.

Add Ons
-Nightcrawler
-Rogue(who is with the bro-hood for half the movie)
-Kitty,Colossus,and Jubilee(some screen time in class or hallway)

Cameos
-Forge
-Wolfsbane

Villains
-Mystique(runs Bro-Hood)
-Toad
-Pyro
-Avalanche
-Magneto(in prison most of time)
-Stryker
-Sabretooth
-Jason

X3

Wolverine leaves

X-Men
-Professor X
-Cyclops
-Storm
-Beast
-Rogue
-Iceman
-Nightcrawler(small role)
-Colossus(small role)
-Kitty
-Jubilee(small role)

Add Ons
-Emma
-Angel(more screen time,like Moira in X3)

Cameos
-Moira
-Banshee
-Stepford Cuckoos

Villains
-Sentinels
-Magneto
-Phoenix

X4

X-Men
-The same team as X3 except no Jean,Nightcrawler,and Beast

Cameo
-Callisto

Villains
-Mr.Sinister
-Marauders(Gambit,Havok,Polaris,Juggernaut,Multiple Man)
 
Some of these rosters are extreme. Apocalypse and the Phoenix Saga are two characters/storylines that shouldn't be intertwined. That is too much. That is way too much, especially if you want there to be any semblance of the original storylines intact. Moreover, what is the point of remaining faithful in the beginning, if you're just going to muck it up later? For instance, why would you want to establish the series via the relationships of the original five, only to have half of those people leave prior to or during the likes of Angel becoming Archangel or Jean Grey becoming Phoenix, when those relationships would prove the most useful in those situations?
 
Last edited:
Some of these rosters are extreme. Apocalypse and the Phoenix Saga are two characters/storylines that shouldn't be intertwined. That is too much. That is way too much, especially if you want there to be any semblance of the original storylines intact. Moreover, what is the point of remaining faithful in the beginning, if you're just going to muck it up later? For instance, why would you want to establish the series via the relationships of the original five, only to have half of those people leave prior to or during the likes of Angel becoming Archangel or Jean Grey becoming Phoenix, when those relationships would prove the most useful in those situations?
If this was a TV series, things could be broader, but this is a movie series. Think about it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"