Spider-Kurt!
Civilian
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2006
- Messages
- 991
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
where would you start? Keep in mind, EVERYTHING in Peter's life starts new from that point.
DACrowe said:Somoetime in the early '90s before the Clone Saga. That way we erase the Clone Saga, Norman coming back, Aunt May coming back (though JMS did use her well, it was still a terrible retconn and we could restart before she died anyways), Aunt May dying even, MJ leaving Peter, MJ being "dead," Venom being a *****, the whole spider-totem, spider-god crap, and teh stupid unmasking and everyone knowing. Also Flash and Liz turning into *******s.
Spider-Kurt! said:where would you start? Keep in mind, EVERYTHING in Peter's life starts new from that point.
DACrowe said:Somoetime in the early '90s before the Clone Saga. That way we erase the Clone Saga, Norman coming back, Aunt May coming back (though JMS did use her well, it was still a terrible retconn and we could restart before she died anyways), Aunt May dying even, MJ leaving Peter, MJ being "dead," Venom being a *****, the whole spider-totem, spider-god crap, and teh stupid unmasking and everyone knowing. Also Flash and Liz turning into *******s.
I mean I did enjoy some of the best GG stories since Norman came back, Aunt May finding out, Ezekiel, etc. but the **** since about 1994 to now far outweighs the good though.
Infinity9999x said:Somewhere mid Clone Saga, before it shot epicly out of proportion, and before we found out Aunt May wasn't really dead, and that Norman was behind everything.
At that point, I would hire a detective, find Citizen Kane, and have him impliment his solution to the clone saga, and then get the guy who does Spider-girl to write Spider-man.
Citizen_Kaine said:If you make the saga never happen, you get the angry "Spider" who apparantly ya'll have forgotten about. Like the Clone Saga or not, the end was result was that Marvel saw how conterversial the idea was, and Spider-Man was taken back to his roots. Additionally the Saga helped create some new characters and memorable moments to the Spider-mytho's and while it had its faults, it is definalty and important aspect to the history of Spider-Man, completly ignoring it, and denying its existence would be quite a faulty step in logic(Ahem Marvel). Now, in my opinion the reboot is where it all went wrong. Everything was fine and dandy with Dematies and Defalco at the helms of the Spider-books, and Spidey was being taken back to his roots. The humour returned(Thanks to Ben Reilly) Mary Jane continued to find new purpose(Thanks to Baby May), and the stories were intresting , and featured the return of Norman Osborn as a key antagonist but in a way that was not over the top(Thanks to you guys). However... The reboot changed that, MJ quit her studies and became a super model again, while starting to worry about Peter being Spider-Man. Aunt May returned instead of Mayday, and continued to act as though Peter was frail, and Spider-Man was a menace. Osborn started channeling his inner Joker and became responsible for every aspect that was wrong in Peter's life. The writers killed MJ in an attempt to make Peter hip with the ladies again yet wrote him as miserable and suffering in every issue. Worst of all Howard Mackie and Bryne reigned supreme, having Uncle Ben get killed by a computer salesmen, the creation of Captain Power, and the loss of Doc Ock's pants.
This my friends was the worst time in Spider-Man history. The cut off point should not be at the begining of the Clone Saga, that very few have read complete, but at Peter Parker 97. This is where Osborn went omnipent, this is where Aunt May returned for no reason, this is where it all went wrong.
Lt. Figgnuts said:I wouldn't.