Superman \S/
Sidekick
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2005
- Messages
- 3,319
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
IMAX experience will be amazing.
Milkman95 said:The only way to see this film is in the IMAX format, both regular and 3-D. Batman Begins was much better on an IMAX screen as well.
Go see it at a regular crap theater after........
Metropolis_Man said:Ill raise your challenge of 4 to 5, anyone want to raise it higher?
you will enjoy it!DvilDog said:This will be my first imax experience
Fatboy Roberts said:How many calories does being relentlessly negative burn? I might need to try this diet.
don't do that...you might turn into this dude...Fatboy Roberts said:How many calories does being relentlessly negative burn? I might need to try this diet.
i'd love for you to tell that to James Cameron.Matt said:Name one movie with 3d where it is moore than a stupid gimmick that doesn't work.
'nuff said.
Fatboy Roberts said:The past is prologue. The new 3d method's gotta be good at SOMETHING if it's getting damn near every big-budget blockbuster luminary that's still alive to jump on the bandwagon.
But yes, 3d has been gimmicky before. Yunno what else was introduced as a gimmick? Anamorphic lenses. Widescreen. COLOR. Surround sound. All those things were initially introduced and written off as gimmicky huckster crap. And eventually people figured out a way to use it and use it so that other filmmakers thought it necessary to adopt the techniques themselves.
If you're hooking Cameron, Lucas, Jackson, Spielberg, Coppola, Rodriguez, I'm thinking there's something worthy there. All of them innovators and excepting Rodriguez, legends in the field, and pioneers in cinema. If they've got faith, I've got faith they see a way to use it that previous directors never did.
DorkyFresh said:i remember when 3d games were gimmicky...
...i guess they're still just stupid gimmicks huh?
edit: OMG!!! 3d RULZ!!!
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()