Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]309602[/split]
Id like to see Betty again, but not Liv Tyler.
Her and Ed Norton are the only two casting flubs Marvel has ever made IMO.
So we'd then have a 13 Going on 30 reunion for Garner and Ruffalo.They should get Jen Garner to play betty
I liked liv Tyler but I associate her with Ed Norton (who I also enjoyed) and wouldnt be able to shake that
Id like to see Betty again, but not Liv Tyler.
Her and Ed Norton are the only two casting flubs Marvel has ever made IMO.
I don't agree. It firmly feels like part of the MCU to me. I think this perception really only stems from it being the highest profile actor change and he has no sequel. But, the MCU embraces the movie and it feels like an organic part of Banner's journey in the MCU to me.
I don't know. It feels so distant at this point and the continuity is so loose with references ala the Burton Batman films to the Schumacher Batman films. They kept certain actors and reference some events but that's about it. Val Kilmer Batman does not feel like Michael Keaton Batman in the same way Mark Ruffalo Hulk does not feel like Edward Norton Hulk.
I never said it doesn't line up, but it is so loose in the sense that you can skip Incredible Hulk and it doesn't affect any of the other films in the MCU. It's just there.
Meaning if you don't watch Iron Man or Captain America: First Avenger before Avengers, it would lessen the movie. Not so with Incredible Hulk as the Ruffalo Hulk is kind of his own thing not dependent on the Hulk movie.
I liked Norton as Banner.
Recently repurchased this on Blu-Ray with the Steelbook cover. Still among my top MCU films, right alongside Iron Man and Winter Soldier. And I would've been very curious to see what more would've been done with the role if Norton in particular had remained.
Id like to see Betty again, but not Liv Tyler.
Her and Ed Norton are the only two casting flubs Marvel has ever made IMO.
I remember vague rumors about a Norton cut of the film with some people claiming to have seen it. A test screening perhaps?
I am still curious what was edited out and just sort of what all went on behind the scenes in this first Marvel Studio's production. There were a number of things I read that sort of turned me off of Marvel films for a while (although to be fair didn't keep up on films/TV in general rally at all 2007-2013 just for other reasons anyway).
Anyone know if that cut was actually much better from a singular film standpoint?