HOTROD1988
Civilian
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2006
- Messages
- 41
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 1
..........
Last edited:
As The Question notes, "children's" fiction was a lot more mature then than it is now. There were no arbitrary separations of what was acceptable for kids and what was not. Mickey Mouse tried to commit suicide a bunch of times in a row. Batman was shooting mo'fackies, with a gun.All ages really. Considering that a lot of these heroes started out as strips in the newspaper.
Wait...why?BRING BACK VIBE!
..........Kids and young teenagers. But adventure fiction for kids and young teenagers was a bit more mature than it is today. You had The Shadow shooting people left and right and Doc Savage labotomizing bad guys.
That's true I think. If I remember correctly, the original "Little Red Riding Hood" didn't have a woodcutter, so the story ends with the wolf devouring the grandmother and Little Red.
it would be AWSOME!!Wait...why?
You don't read many DC comics, do you?I think DC never really got out of its 30s/40s roots in regards of its heros most of them still seem simple characters with unamaginative powers with villains that are transparent and only a threat to the city they reside in the culture change in the 60s and Marvels entrance into comics is the reason comics are still around today IMO.
probably kids i dont think adults read comics back then