Octoberist
point blank
- Joined
- May 13, 2005
- Messages
- 46,465
- Reaction score
- 17
- Points
- 33
I just saw it - yes it's the first great movie of the year. Well directed, it's tight and surprisingly emotional.
Source Code was pretty awesome, I think it used its premise well. You could say its predictable to some degree, but at the same I think it did a pretty good job at mixing it up. At first I wasnt digging the ending but in the very end it pull it off pretty well, I still have my problems with it somewhat but it didn't really hinder my movie at all.
There was one instance where, without anything really being funny, both my friend and I started laughing, for which we garnered many awkward looks from the people around us. Basically it amounts to us being horrible people, or really sick senses of humor.
Was itIt was kinda funny but it didn't ruin the movie.the long shot of Jake. He was making a face (like he's not believing what he's hearing) but it goes on for too long?
I agree about Groundhogs Day. Obviously this isn't silly.I thought of it more of Hitchcock meets Twilight Zone meets Groundhogs Day more then Minority Report.
I agree about Groundhogs Day. Obviously this isn't silly.
[blackout]Creator of a program needing a disaster to enact his program to save future life[/blackout] is very Minority Report. That is why I kept thinking [blackout]he was the second phone and Colter was going to figure it out[/blackout].

Source Code was pretty awesome, I think it used its premise well. You could say its predictable to some degree, but at the same I think it did a pretty good job at mixing it up. At first I wasnt digging the ending but in the very end it pull it off pretty well, I still have my problems with it somewhat but it didn't really hinder my movie at all.
There was one instance where, without anything really being funny, both my friend and I started laughing, for which we garnered many awkward looks from the people around us. Basically it amounts to us being horrible people, or really sick senses of humor.
Vapor
Yes the end all took place in the parrallel universe. The Goodwin that received the text was the alternate one and not the one that we knew throughout the rest of the movie. My thing is if Colter's consciousness still embodies Sean then wtf happened to Sean's consciousness in that world?
The only explanation I gave myself was the whole "same matter can't occupy same space" thing. Since there is a Colter already in that world one can assume the Colter we know eventually fades away and Sean's consciousness remanifests in his body. Unless they pull a Quantum Leap like when Dr. Beckett leaped into Lee Harvey Oswald and their consciousness were merging after a gradual period of time. So the new Sean is a combo of both Colter and Sean.
Hmmm I wish they had more room to explain the science in this universe cause that was the only thing that left me like "huh".
[BLACKOUT]I mean, she's not really falling in love with him, she's falling in love with Sean.
[/BLACKOUT]
[BLACKOUT]Yeah that makes sense.. Goodwin turns his life support off and that's the end of that Colter. Everything we see after takes place in the alternate timeline created by the source code. It's never really explicitly explained or shown to be like that (although it is kinda obvious/plausible when you think about)..
Although that doesn't really explain how their can be 2 Colters, as he is still there on life support waiting for his first Source Code mission. What happens to Seans 'mind' is another question too... It could be considered that Colter 'killed' him by taking over his body. Also, I'm not sure I'd wanna do what Colter did... I mean, she's not really falling in love with him, she's falling in love with Sean.
[/BLACKOUT]
Still, as has being said, it's a solid effort. And Jake is really good in it. I personally wouldn't mind seeing Duncan have a go at the mooted Logans Run remake.
I must interject in this thought provoking discussion and say that Michelle Monaghan is ridiculously cute. Whenever she smiled, I know every dude in the audience was like, "I need to gets some of that to come home to."
It seems your entire disappointment lies on its deviance from the original script. And that's fine, but it's not much of a review of the film as a product of its own. You shouldn't have to compare it to what it was or could have been, but what it actually is.
It seems your entire disappointment lies on its deviance from the original script. And that's fine, but it's not much of a review of the film as a product of its own. You shouldn't have to compare it to what it was or could have been, but what it actually is.
Parker Wayne said:This. I don't think anymore needs to be said on my part, but a filme needs to be judged on what it is, not what it is supposed to be like. With that said, I'm not saying it's bad to be disappointed, but I think it's a little too much to call it painful to watch, especially since the film was handled pretty well.