Jared Leto IS The Joker - Part 9

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't think it's much worse than The Joker being the one who killed Batman's parents in Batman '89, and thus "created" Batman as the movie put it (which also got a big fan backlash). And Harley Quinn is not nearly as important a character as Batman is.

I think it is much, much worse. In B89, neither Batman nor The Joker were aware that the latter "created" the former until well into their showdown. The BS fan-fiction scenario for Suicide Squad would have this Joker be and have always been an entirely separate yet fully realised character who is absolutely key to Batman's story.

It would be difficult to imagine a greater perversion of the mythos. The Black Glove could do no better!
 
While we're on the subject: although I don't have a problem with the idea of The Joker murdering Batman's parents, I think B89 could've handled it better than it did.
 
While we're on the subject: although I don't have a problem with the idea of The Joker murdering Batman's parents, I think B89 could've handled it better than it did.

Like...?
 
I don't think the film should've waited as long as it did to make the reveal. It felt like a tacked on, unnecessary, and clichéd way of making the fight between The Joker and Batman a personal one at a point where it didn't need to be.
 
There is some justice in that view, but I always stress that B89 was made with the expectation that it would be a one-off, once-only Batman movie. Stitching the narrative so closely together is understandable with that in mind.
 
As a huge Joker fan I don't like the twist in Batman 89 of having Joker kill Bruce's parents...BUT for what that movie was going for, it did work...even though I don't like it.

Batman 89, was a standalone Batman movie, if that film had not been the hit it was at the time, there might not have been a Batman Returns etc.

Spoiler Alert
They killed Joker at the end of that movie
Burton was essentially making one complete film, with one closed arch...he wasn't setting up Batman and Joker to continue their feud in a wider universe like the comics.

Now Leto's Joker is set to be THE JOKER of the DCEU, not just a one-off Joker in ONE Batman film, like Batman 89.

So it wouldn't make much sense for him to be a former Robin, like the rumors suggest. Fans wouldn't accept him as the REAL JOKER and would be wondering when the REAL Joker was going to emerge, etc.

It would cause a whole bunch of problems, and frankly I don't know how this rumor started in the first place. I never got the idea that Joker was Robin from watching the trailers, I thought it was clear that they were trying to suggest that Joker KILLED Robin (Death in the Family, etc) not that he WAS Robin. :loco:
 
There is some justice in that view, but I always stress that B89 was made with the expectation that it would be a one-off, once-only Batman movie. Stitching the narrative so closely together is understandable with that in mind.

Oh, sure. I don't hate how it went down; I don't even consider it a major flaw. I just wish that it had been done differently, that's all.
 
You know what? That's a really good point!

Thank you.

If this twist happens in Suicide Squad, I hope it's done well, and not just for the sake of pointless referencing of other stuff in Batman's universe. If it works for the story, great. :up:

Exactly. Fans will hate it to death, and some will defend it much like the Mandarin twist, or the awful B'89 one, but the GA won't care. Just like they don't care about most of the comic book related things us fans complain about.

I think it is much, much worse. In B89, neither Batman nor The Joker were aware that the latter "created" the former until well into their showdown. The BS fan-fiction scenario for Suicide Squad would have this Joker be and have always been an entirely separate yet fully realised character who is absolutely key to Batman's story.

It would be difficult to imagine a greater perversion of the mythos. The Black Glove could do no better!

I don't see what difference it makes that it wasn't revealed until later in the movie. Would it help if this SS movie reveals late into the story that Joker is really Robin?

A twist, whether it's good or bad, it doesn't matter when they reveal it because once they do you know it every time you go back and watch the movie. If it's a good twist it usually enhances the movie on a second viewing because you can sometimes pick up subtle hints that point to it that you wouldn't have noticed first time around because you weren't looking for them. A bad twist just taints the movie on a second viewing because you know it's coming, you know what you're watching is spoiled for what ever reason because of the nature of the twist. Imagine watching Suicide Squad knowing the Joker you're looking at is actually Robin. It won't matter if they haven't revealed it yet in the movie when you already know they will.

For the record I think Robin as the Joker in this movie is an utterly stupid baseless idea. Like horribly bad. But to me it's not much worse having a Robin-Joker create Harley Quinn than it is for the Joker creating Batman. If anything the latter is worse in many ways because Batman, and his relationship with Joker is much more important and iconic. It feels more wrong to me having Joker create Batman, than it does for a Joker Robin to create Harley.

I don't think the film should've waited as long as it did to make the reveal. It felt like a tacked on, unnecessary, and clichéd way of making the fight between The Joker and Batman a personal one at a point where it didn't need to be.

It was tacked on and unnecessary. Tim Burton decided to put it in at the last minute during the writers strike. Even Sam Hamm, the scriptwriter of B'89, was against it;

'Many observed that Burton was more interested in the Joker rather than Batman in terms of characterization and screen time. Comic book fans reacted negatively over the Joker murdering Thomas and Martha Wayne. In the comic book, Joe Chill is responsible. Writer Sam Hamm, who is a comic book fan, said it was Burton's idea to have the Joker murder Wayne's parents. "The Writer's Strike was going on," Hamm continued, "and Tim had the other writers do that. I also hold innocent to Alfred letting Vicki Vale into the Batcave," he reasoned. "Fans were ticked off with that, and I agree. That would have been Alfred's last day of employment at Wayne Manor." '

http://destinyosbourne.hubpages.com/hub/the-batman
 
Last edited:
Unlike superman, there obviously so many ways you can write the joker and it works. Awesome!!
 
Not sure why you had to take a shot at Superman to make your point, but I will say that I agree with it.
 
It wasn't a shot. It's just true. Actually didn't really realize it until a friend who is hardcore Kal-El fan explain to me why it is. So even though I like Superman, it was just an example as to how diverse the Joker character is. Not meant to disrespect Superman.
 
Gotcha. Sorry if I came off as defensive. I'm a huge Superman fan, and I can't tell you how often I've heard people claim that he's boring or whatever.
 
I think it is much, much worse. In B89, neither Batman nor The Joker were aware that the latter "created" the former until well into their showdown. The BS fan-fiction scenario for Suicide Squad would have this Joker be and have always been an entirely separate yet fully realised character who is absolutely key to Batman's story.

It would be difficult to imagine a greater perversion of the mythos. The Black Glove could do no better!



Yes. I'm not sure how one could even make a comparison between the B89 twist and this "Joker is Robin" thing in terms of perversions.
 
I don't think the film should've waited as long as it did to make the reveal. It felt like a tacked on, unnecessary, and clichéd way of making the fight between The Joker and Batman a personal one at a point where it didn't need to be.

Yeah, I remember when I was watching it the first time (I was only 8 or so) I thought Batman knew Jack was his parents' killer the whole time and that was why he was so adamant about perusing him in the first place. I think it actually would have worked better that way.
 
Yeah, I remember when I was watching it the first time (I was only 8 or so) I thought Batman knew Jack was his parents' killer the whole time and that was why he was so adamant about perusing him in the first place. I think it actually would have worked better that way.

Bruce Wayne actually missed out on learning who killed his parents earlier in the film. There is a scene where he is looking at older Jack's mugshot. Right next to it is a photo of a younger Jack's mugshot. It just has a paper over the top of it. So Burton left little clues that he was the guy. Bruce just didnt get around to looking at the younger mugshot.
 
Gotcha. Sorry if I came off as defensive. I'm a huge Superman fan, and I can't tell you how often I've heard people claim that he's boring or whatever.

No problem. I may have came off like that so I'm sorry. To me Batman is #1 and Superman # 2 and I love all comics but those are just the two top guys and nobody else really comes close. And the only time I purposely talk crap about Superman is when it's about those two squaring off. And really Supermans only weakness isn't Kryptonite, but the way he was originally written. Which I love, and why he and Batman will never drop below #2 on any list, but he does have to be squeaky clean in the story and if it goes too off it messes everything up.
 
Jared is back in Toronto. Joker still filming :)

tumblr_nrxl5hQZ1J1qamlhro3_1280.jpg
 
You could cut yourself on his jawline.
 
I really do wonder just how committed he is to playing The Joker multiple times.

I just think of how tough that would have been for Ledger if he had to "go there" numerous times.

Leto has secluded himself from the rest of the cast. Leto is constantly in character while on set. He has no eyebrows for months. He takes his method acting very seriously and that can be very draining.

He'll also be 44 when this movie comes out. Then the pressure of living up to Jack and Heath.

I could see playing Jack's Joker. The way he played the character was such fun that you could tell he was having a blast.

Heath and seemingly Jared have gone to dark places to portray their version.

And FTR no I dont think playing the Joker killed Heath. I'm just saying that properly portraying that kind of role takes a lot out of you.
 
Jared probably secluded himself from the rest of the cast because he probly only has scenes with Margot Robbie, and he's also busy traveling around the world with his band.

Leto hasn't gone to any dark place for the role, he's still living his life the same way he has with all his other roles.

Stop reading into what's not there.
 
Jared probably secluded himself from the rest of the cast because he probly only has scenes with Margot Robbie, and he's also busy traveling around the world with his band.

Leto hasn't gone to any dark place for the role, he's still living his life the same way he has with all his other roles.

Stop reading into what's not there.

This he's always snap chatting all these cool places he's going, hiking, etc...
 
Exactly. His snapchat is where I saw his Joker prior to its release, but someone ended up saving the pic and it leaked.
 
We need a good villian for a decade. It could change everything for him and us.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,391
Messages
22,096,412
Members
45,893
Latest member
KCA Masterpiece
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"