Speaking of the history of SNL, you know what would also make for an interesting movie is the behind the scenes of the sixth season, which was the first one without Lorne Michaels and was such a ****show that if it wasn't for Eddie Murphy and to a lesser extent Joe Piscopo the entire show might have been canned.
If we get a sequel, I know which night it should be; SNL 1978.
I heard that, too! From Eric Goldman- a former IGN reviewer. Hearing that the film is good, but takes some liberties by including pieces of SNL history that happen after the period that this film is focused on, kind of like how Bohemian Rhapsody had some historical events portrayed out of order.So apparently this movie's facing some heat for how it portrays Jim Henson? Apparently it portrays him as a complete loser, which is BS.
To be fair, biopics or historical movies take liberties all the time and I still enjoyed Bohemian Rhapsody regardless as a Queen fan. And Ray's entire ending is a load of bull ("And he never did drugs again" even though him relapsing during production of the damn movie is how he died IRL!).I heard that, too! From Eric Goldman- a former IGN reviewer. Hearing that the film is good, but takes some liberties by including pieces of SNL history that happen after the period that this film is focused on, kind of like how Bohemian Rhapsody had some historical events portrayed out of order.
I'm still gonna see it because, well, I'm just a big fan of early SNL in-particular and this cast looks solid.
He was in an episode of American Dad a few years ago, but as far as live action goes, I can't think of anything he's been in, either.There's so many cast members that I had no idea Robert Wuhl was in this until now. I can't remember the last time I saw him in anything besides numerous Batman rewatches.
There's so many cast members that I had no idea Robert Wuhl was in this until now. I can't remember the last time I saw him in anything besides numerous Batman rewatches.