hippy fascist
Avenger
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2006
- Messages
- 10,036
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
A lot of people complain about JMS work on spider-man and fantastic four, lots of people have also been *****ing about the fact he's doing the new thor book. However they seem to forget that he's repsonsible for some of the best writing in the business.
Every writer has bad periods, hell I'm not gonna sit here and defend "the other", but people need to check out some of his other stuff before complaining so much
I recently picked up rising stars which was amazing, midnight nation was phenomenal and the original supreme power MAX series was awesome. If you want to talk about spider-man go back to the coming home era and you'll see that JMS saved this book from slipping into a far worse state than it's in at the moment.
My view is that to get the best out of JMS it has to be a limited story, leave him on a title for too long and he runs out of ideas, but then again the same thing could be applied to virtually any writer working today.
I guess what I'm saying is that people are too quick to judge based on a couple of books that are slipping in terms of quality at the moment. People forget that all writers have their ups and downs (kirkman's UXM anyone?) and personally I think that any writer should be judged on their entire body of work rather than a couple of recent runs.
Surely there must be some JMS fans out there? Make yourselves known god damnit!
Every writer has bad periods, hell I'm not gonna sit here and defend "the other", but people need to check out some of his other stuff before complaining so much
I recently picked up rising stars which was amazing, midnight nation was phenomenal and the original supreme power MAX series was awesome. If you want to talk about spider-man go back to the coming home era and you'll see that JMS saved this book from slipping into a far worse state than it's in at the moment.
My view is that to get the best out of JMS it has to be a limited story, leave him on a title for too long and he runs out of ideas, but then again the same thing could be applied to virtually any writer working today.
I guess what I'm saying is that people are too quick to judge based on a couple of books that are slipping in terms of quality at the moment. People forget that all writers have their ups and downs (kirkman's UXM anyone?) and personally I think that any writer should be judged on their entire body of work rather than a couple of recent runs.
Surely there must be some JMS fans out there? Make yourselves known god damnit!