Lady in the Water: new poster and trailer

Super Flight said:
But wouldnt have been just a great twist if they thought the aliens were evil but werent! and that they came to earth! with a surprise cameo of ET, such a twist!
.........







.......





































bad place........... no
 
hmmmm... how about the usual Suspects from outerspace?

aliens.jpg
 
The only Shymalan movie I like is Signs. This one looks good, but so did The Village and he ****ed up with horrible execution(unneeded lame-ash twists for one thing), and unfortunately he'll probably end up doing the same thing here.
 
Super Flight said:
i didnt like it becasue it was just another aliens invading earth movie with no great special effects, lol...

well no. Usually those movies involve the overblown special effects with the military launching some kind of counterstrike all on a global scale. (War of the Worlds or...gasp...ID4, both of which I didn't like near as much as Signs)This was about how one family is impacted. Actually the movie was more about faith. The title "Signs" has a double meaning. It's more about signs of a higher power working in someone's life than signs of extra-terrestrial life. The significant reveal at the end was that God had been working in his life the whole time up to that point and he just realised it. Like I said, I'm not religious, but I don't mind it as a device and it worked here. Plus...I got a kick out of seeing that audience jump and scream like a bunch of little girls in the theater.
 
xwolverine2 said:
M. night shamalayhsn.... its suppossed to be a mystery from start to finish.

Well, what is the basic synopsis of it, at least? I saw the trailer a good while ago and it just seemed like some slob being dull and there was somethign about a 'lady in the water'. and now I'm hearing about a 'Beast' and twists and turns?!
 
Ultimate Movie-Man said:
Finally! Another supporter. I hate how after The Village everyone's been bashin night.

IMO The Village is his best film since Sixth Sense. But I have a feeling LitW will top it.

I thought I was the only one :p
 
A man by the name of Cleveland Heep finds a women in the Apartment pool. She turns out to be a water Narf/Nymph. She claims that she is from a bedtime story, & that she needs to return back. So the movie is about everyone in the Complex banding together to help this water Narf/Nymph.

That is the advertising description, but as with most Sham's films. I am sure that the movie will be much deeper than that.
 
^ thanks, i saw in the trailer it said was she somebody to protect or to fear.
 
I think Unbreakable was M. Night's best movie. Just seemed perfect to me and the big "twist" doesn't ruin the movie for repeat viewing.

Sixth Sense was good, well made, but the "twist" was easy to figure out and has very little in repeat viewing ability. You might want to watch it once or twice more to see all the signs that Willis was dead, but once you know the movie isn't quite as exciting.

Signs was great up until everyone comes out of the basement, at that point the movie went straight down the crapper. The movie had a lot of tension and kept increasing, then you find out the aliens die when exposed to water?!?! WTF?!?! They came to a planet where 70% of it is something that will kill them!

I didn't even bother with the Village and don't think I'm gonna bother with Lady in the Water.
 
amazingfantasy15 said:
Signs was great up until everyone comes out of the basement, at that point the movie went straight down the crapper. The movie had a lot of tension and kept increasing, then you find out the aliens die when exposed to water?!?! WTF?!?! They came to a planet where 70% of it is something that will kill them!

I didn't even bother with the Village and don't think I'm gonna bother with Lady in the Water.

With the water killing aliens, that's always been a weakness of most aliens if I remember correctly.

The Village was dumb. Plain and simple.
 
The movie looks like a big time thriller. I like how M. puts all that thriller on the edge of your seat.
 
Majik1387 said:
With the water killing aliens, that's always been a weakness of most aliens if I remember correctly.
I'm pretty sure your thinking of witches
Witches.
 
Witches yes but I remember aliens have always had some obsession with water.
 
Majik1387 said:
Witches yes but I remember aliens have always had some obsession with water.
Only if the aliens are also witches.
 
I know a lot of people are looking forward to this flick... post reviews here and make it the official thread... I don't know about you, but I happened to stumble on some early reaction to this film... and once again it sounds like a lot of people are disappointed... again... anyone think it is worth seeing this film on opening night or what?
 
Summary:
Not only Shyamalan's scariest and funniest movie to date, but also his most accomplished, "Lady in the Water" ably tells an original and unconventional fairy tale in a way that makes you want to believe.

Story:
Cleveland Heap (Paul Giamatti), superintendent of The Cove apartment buildings, starts experiencing bizarre happenings after finding a strange but beautiful young woman named Story (Bryce Dallas Howard) living under the complex's swimming pool. He agrees to help her fulfill her mission, working with the Cove's wacky residents to try to solve the mysteries that surround this enigmatic woman.

Analysis:
Whatever you may have to say about M. Night Shyamalan, you have to give him credit for doing things differently than most directors with a couple Hollywood blockbuster under the belts. After exploring ghosts, superheroes, aliens and 18th Century villagers, he delves further into the world of fantasy, but instead of following routes laid down by Tolkien and C.S. Lewis, he has created an original fairy tale that takes place in our own world. To say that it's a departure would be an understatement.

At the center of the story is Paul Giamatti's Cleveland Heap, a sad middle-aged man who gave up on a medical career after a tragic incident to work as the put-upon super at The Cove. He takes his surroundings in stride, having become accustomed to dealing with the complex's eccentric residents on a daily basis. The strangest of these is Freddy Rodriguez's Reggie, who has only been working out on one side of his body to make himself look like a circus freak, there's the chain-smoking philosophers who talk nonsense all day, and the stern Mr. Leeds who sits at home watching war films.

When Cleveland stumbles and falls into the pool while investigating strange goings-on, he wakes up back in his apartment with a beautiful half-naked girl sitting next to him. She calls herself Story and says she's a "narf" on a special assignment, and oddly, Cleveland's pronounced stutter vanishes whenever he's around her. Cleveland consults with Korean co-ed Young-Sun Choi and her aging mother, who see similarities to a Korean fable, and tries to find out how to help Story fulfill her mission. Story is far more than a sea nymph, at The Cove to help mankind by finding a writer who will have a lasting impact on a future leader. It's pretty amusing that said writer is played by Night himself. Standing in their way is a horrifying wolven beast called a Scrunt with a grass-like pelt that allows it to hide in the grass, and it's only mission is to kill Story before she fulfills said mission.

This is a very strange movie, and it takes a good deal of patience and concentration to watch it slowly unfold as Cleveland puts together the pieces of the puzzle. All the talk of Scrunts, Madam Narfs and something called "The Tartutic," makes it hard to keep a straight face while watching it, but that doesn't make the creatures any less horrifying. In particular, the Scrunt is as fierce and deadly as any movie werewolf, offering more than a few genuine scares, but Shyamalan isn't above keeping you so on edge by repeatedly scaring the bejeebies out of you, making you jump every time the sprinkler goes off. The other beasts, designed by "Crash" McCreery, the man behind the creatures in "Pirates: Dead Man's Chest," may look a bit silly, being modeled after real animals, but they look far better than similar CG creatures, maybe because they're not.

At this point, me singing the praises of Paul Giamatti would be like telling someone the sky is blue. He's obviously one of the more entertaining dramatic actors, and he brings just the right amount of humor to what is an emotionally rich character. Bryce Dallas Howard, who showed some impressive dramatic chops in "The Village," Shyamalan's last movie and her feature film debut, takes a back-seat to Giamatti, mainly because she doesn't have nearly as many lines.

Still, it's Bob Balaban who steals every scene as a know-it-all movie critic, who offers a running commentary to the story, announcing what part everyone should play in it. He offers some of the movie's funniest moments, which will be enjoyed by anyone who has ever questioned the motive of critics. Freddy Rodriguez's Reggie may be one of the strangest characters ever seen in a movie, which makes you wish there were more of him.

The rest of the cast is barely mediocre, even great character actors like Geoffrey Wright and Jared Harris, who have been so much better in other movies. Shyamalan himself plays a larger part here than in past movies. To some, his role may seem like the height of ego, but it's more bothersome because his scenes take you out of the movie. Sarita Choudhury ("Mississippi Masala") offers a couple laughs as his nagging sister, but that humor often feels forced as she plays it up with an exaggerated voice. Likewise, Cindy Cheung, wearing outlandish outfits and speaking in a sillier broken English accent, plays Young-Soon as the type of Asian stereotype that is going to be more offensive than funny to some.

The real trick is to integrate all these bizarre characters into the dark fairy tale, but it leads to a climactic third act where they join together to get Story to something called a "Great Eatlon" that will take her back to the sea. Night is far subtler with his twists this time around, but by that time, you've become so absorbed into the lives of these people that you really hope they'll succeed.

More than anything else, there's a meaningful message that everyone has a role to fulfill in life, which allows for a number of potent emotional and spiritual moments. The only thing missing really is a suitable epilogue to tell us what happens to the characters next; even a text epilogue would have sufficed.

Regardless of these negligible issues, the movie is quite gorgeous thanks to Night's secret weapon, cinematographer Christopher Doyle, who makes every scene look amazing by finding interesting ways of shooting them. Seriously, if real life looked as good as Doyle makes it look here, I'd be quite happy living in a world of Narfs and Scrunts.

The Bottom Line:
This is not M. Night Shyamalan's most immediate work of fiction, and I honestly can say that I have no idea whether fans of his earlier work will embrace this or be too confused by the departure. Those who truly want to believe that fantasy and magic exist in our world are given a wonderful story that is far more satisfying in terms of characters and original ideas than anything Shyamalan's done in the past.

http://www.comingsoon.net/news/reviewsnews.php?id=15352
 
i thought the trailer and commercials for this film made it look cheesey... it seems to me that the whole little-kid-whispering-or-rhyming-to-try-to-sound-scary bit has run its course... it just doesn't work anymore... when it was Nightmare on Elm Street, it was scary, but when it's been done a million times now, it just loses the effect, you know?
 
Good lord... There´s so little interest on the new Shyamalan flick i had to go four pages to find a thread on it... Critics are blasting the thing on RT, and the AICN staffers who worship Shyamalan are dodging and dodging in their reviews cuz they can´t find a way to say it´s good... The story about his departure from Disney is pure diva crap.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"