• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Thursday Aug 14, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST. This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Less Likable Film Counterpart

Spider-Aziz

Dummy Dragon Holo
Joined
Oct 11, 2010
Messages
83,442
Reaction score
8,953
Points
103
Inspired by this post.
Just a thought dude, you could do another thread for "movie versions of comic book characters that you hated!" for movie versions of characters that made them less likeable.

Is there a character you love or like that you think has a less likable - loathed presentation on screen?
 
Do you mean characters that we think are less sympathetic (as in the filmmakers turned them into jerks) or characters that we dislike because they were awful adaptations of the source material?
 
MJ in the Raimi Spider-man movies. She was awful in that series.

She was used more like an instrument designed to invoke different feelings towards Peter from the audience. If they wanted us to feel pumped for his heroics, she was a damsel in distress (multiple times). If they wanted us to feel sorry for him, she was a flake that jumped from man to man depending on who made Peter feel the most inadequate in comparison. The end result was that her character was thrown under the bus and she came off like a helpless place-holder clinging to the man of the moment.

I'm not claiming she hasn't been written poorly in comics too, but when I think of a comic character that was made extremely unlikable in movie form, she comes to mind.
 
Anyways, I'll go with Peter Parker from the Amazing Spider-Man series, since he fits both. A selfish, egotistical, whiny jerk who never learns that 'with great power comes great responsibility.' A horrible adaptation of the character.
 
MJ in the Raimi Spider-man movies. She was awful in that series.

She was used more like an instrument designed to invoke different feelings towards Peter from the audience. If they wanted us to feel pumped for his heroics, she was a damsel in distress (multiple times). If they wanted us to feel sorry for him, she was a flake that jumped from man to man depending on who made Peter feel the most inadequate in comparison. The end result was that her character was thrown under the bus and she came off like a helpless place-holder clinging to the man of the moment.

I'm not claiming she hasn't been written poorly in comics too, but when I think of a comic character that was made extremely unlikable in movie form, she comes to mind.

As soon as I saw this thread title, you pretty much read my mind with your post. :funny:

A HORRIBLE, HORRIBLE depiction of Marvel's most iconic love interest...

In the comics, MJ is wonderful, charming, extremely likable, fun and outgoing. The film version was none of those things. She was selfish, obnoxious and she literally managed to suck the energy out of every scene she was in.
 
Do you mean characters that we think are less sympathetic (as in the filmmakers turned them into jerks) or characters that we dislike because they were awful adaptations of the source material?
You can state either one.
 
Tony Stark. Arrogant, egotistical, insulting, *****ebag

Anyways, I'll go with Peter Parker from the Amazing Spider-Man series, since he fits both. A selfish, egotistical, whiny jerk who never learns that 'with great power comes great responsibility.' A horrible adaptation of the character.

Yep nothing more selfish or irresponsible that risking ones life to save a kid falling from a bridge, NYC from a biological attack, People on the streets, people from electrocution at Times Square ect...
 
Last edited:
Brett Reed/Green Hornet.

Man, the movie version of the character is embarrassing.
 
Tony Stark. Arrogant, egotistical, insulting, *****ebag

Yep nothing more selfish or irresponsible that risking ones life to save a kid falling from a bridge, NYC from a biological attack, People on the streets, people from electrocution at Times Square ect...

Oh man, the irony of calling Tony Stark a *****ebag even though that's the entire point of the character, and then defending Andrew Garfield's Spider-man on the merit that he saved so many people despite being a *****e....
You know Tony's saved a lot of people as well, right? Arguably the entire planet? :hehe:
 
If you want to go by *****ey superheroes and then defending one saying he/she saved lives, all superheroes do that.
Oh man, the irony of calling Tony Stark a *****ebag even though that's the entire point of the character, and then defending Andrew Garfield's Spider-man on the merit that he saved so many people despite being a *****e....
You know Tony's saved a lot of people as well, right? Arguably the entire planet? :hehe:
Starting with Manhattan.
One massive save, done by a big save.
 
Anyways, I'll go with Peter Parker from the Amazing Spider-Man series, since he fits both. A selfish, egotistical, whiny jerk who never learns that 'with great power comes great responsibility.' A horrible adaptation of the character.

Seconded. I am so glad those movies got cut off after only two.
 
Obvious ones are Riddler, Two Face, Poison Ivy and Mr. Freeze from the Schumacher debacles.

Ghost Rider.

Catwoman (Halle Berry), I know this wasn't Selena Kyle.

Steel

Superman in Superman Returns

Venom in Spider-Man 3.

Electro in The Amazing Spider-Man 2.

Harry Osborn in the Amazing Spider-Man 2.
 
Most of those are villains, since when are villains meant to be likeable

Oh man, the irony of calling Tony Stark a *****ebag even though that's the entire point of the character, and then defending Andrew Garfield's Spider-man on the merit that he saved so many people despite being a *****e....
You know Tony's saved a lot of people as well, right? Arguably the entire planet? :hehe:

There's no irony at all since they're different traits with no relation.

I responded to Peter being selfish and irresponsible and nothing else. That has nothing to do with Stark being a jerk and I never commented on his heroics.

If you want to go by *****ey superheroes and then defending one saying he/she saved lives, all superheroes do that.

Irresponsible or selfish is different than *****ey. Two separate traits
 
Last edited:
Also, all the evil mutants in X-3, including Juggernaut.

Deadpool and Sabretooth in Wolverine Origins.
 
Also, all the evil mutants in X-3, including Juggernaut.

Deadpool and Sabretooth in Wolverine Origins.
Sabertooth is considered to be one of the movie's highlights.
Yours is the second opinion -from ones I saw thus far- openly disliking that Sabertooth.
 
Most of those are villains, since when are villains meant to be likeable



There's no irony at all since they're different traits with no relation.

I responded to Peter being selfish and irresponsible and nothing else. That has nothing to do with Stark being a jerk and I never commented on his heroics.



Irresponsible or selfish is different than *****ey. Two separate traits

Either way, it's funny how you take umbrage with arguably the most popular cinematic superhero of all time and defend one of the worst on undeniably similar grounds.
 
Sabertooth is considered to be one of the movie's highlights.
Yours is the second opinion -from ones I saw thus far- openly disliking that Sabertooth.

He might be one of the highlights in a movie that has very few, but I prefer the original Sabertooth in X-Men to what we saw in Origins. Both are a pretty poor adaptation.

Creed - "You think you can just walk away?!"
*Logan turns and walks away*
 
Inspired by this post.

Is there a character you love or like that you think has a less likable - loathed presentation on screen?


First of all, Cheers dude, they say that he who is thinking of something, is passed by he who is doing it, so thanks for setting up the thread.

Now who was I thinking of when I said that............. well George Clooney's Batman almost put me off Batman for good. Brandon Routh almost turned me off Superman, but that may have been more Bryan Singer's fault.
Anyway, these are one-offs in series that have had pretty good performances by the main character (I'm thinking Christian Bale, Michael Keaton, Christopher Reeve and Henry Cavill).

Probably the least likeable versions, IMO, are:

1) Ryan Reynolds as Green Lantern. In the comics Hal Jordan is a cocky, hotheaded but tough and likeable character. We believe his will is second to none, and that even if he doesn't think his way out of every situation. He's a guy we can cheer for.

In the film Hal was a *****e bag without enough cockiness or balls to be charming and who kind of gives up halfway through - something comic Hal never does, no matter what the situation.

Maybe it was the film as a whole, but I think the comic version of Green Lantern is like a Greek God compared to the film version.


2) Andrew Garfield's Peter Parker, in the first film. At the end of ASM there's that "best kind of promises " line, and I thought "Peter Parker would never do that. What an ass-wipe." Yeah, Peter Parker in the comics screws up all the time and is far from perfect, but we can all cheer for him. Garfield was okay when in the suit, as performing as Spider Man, but as PP he made me cringe.

Strangely, the one thing I thought was better about ASM 2 was that Garfield was much better as Peter, much more likeable anyway.

3) Aldrich Killian as the Mandarin: I hesitated to bring this one up, as there have been threads dealing with all the issues around Iron Man 3.

Anyway, I would have been okay with Sir Ben as the Mandarin, but the way it played out annoyed me. I guess I'm stuck on the classic mandarin depiction - and while for some other characters Shane Black's interpretation would have been funny and very clever, for this one it just didn't work. But that's just my opinion.




In the comics, MJ is wonderful, charming, extremely likable, fun and outgoing. The film version was none of those things. She was selfish, obnoxious and she literally managed to suck the energy out of every scene she was in.

Yeah, I agree with that. MJ was not a good love interest at all. Sadly, Iris West is just as bad in the Flash TV series.

I agree that Sabretooth was also badly adapted, but nowhere as cringeworthy as Green Lantern or Garfield's PP.

Just for the record, I did think Renolds was a great Deadpool (in fact his character from Blade III was pretty much Deadpool without the superpowers) As for Last Stand's Juggernaut, well it was different, but it worked for me because it pretty much captured who the Juggernaut is, a big thug who likes smashing things.
 
Both Peter and MJ from the Raimi Spidey movies. I didn't care for either of those adaptations of the characters.

Hal Jordan in Green Lantern.

Hawkeye in the MCU.

Cyclops, Storm, Jean Grey and Rogue in the X-Men movies. I can never love the Singer-verse for this reason.

Also, as a Superman fan, I've never seen a version of him on screen that I felt did the character I know from the comics justice, either. I love Cavill in the role, for the record, but the version of the character that's being written for him still doesn't live up to the version in my head.
 
I completely second Kirsten Dunst as MJ. I think she was what she needed to be in the first one, but by the third she clearly didn't even want to be there.
 
Movie Mary Jane is certainly less likable than her comic book counterpart when she is written well on the page. But she is not fatal to her films the way that Andrew Garfield's Spidey was in TASM1. I actually liked how Garfield played Spidey in TASM2, but in TASM1 it was pretty well off.

The Lizard also went from being a really fun Spidey villain to a bore. Schumaucher of course also ruined Two-Face, Mister Freeze, Poison Ivy, and Batgirl, but that goes almost without saying.

And as much as I like the Singer X-Mne movies, that franchise really wasted and disserviced Cyclops, Storm, and Colossus. Gambit was also misused in XOW. But that whole movie is bad, so that seems almost moot to bring up.
 
DACrowe said:
And as much as I like the Singer X-Mne movies, that franchise really wasted and disserviced Cyclops, Storm, and Colossus

Emma Frost too.

And yeah, as others have mentioned, Hal Jordan as portrayed by Ryan Reynolds was awful. The only reasons I don't think he is quite as bad as Garfield's Peter Parker are because I am far more of a Spider-Man fan than Green Lantern so it bugged me more and because at least Green Lantern made some minimal effort to try and show that he had changed his ways by the end of the movie and that never happened for Garfield's Parker.
 
Last edited:
Definitely Peter in the Amazing Spidey. Peter's flaws have always been a part of the character i related to, but this guy was just a total unlikable jerk. When i completely understand why Harry would try to kill him and Gwen and i feel nothing for Peter afterwards that is just terrible.
 
Movie Mary Jane is certainly less likable than her comic book counterpart when she is written well on the page. But she is not fatal to her films the way that Andrew Garfield's Spidey was in TASM1. I actually liked how Garfield played Spidey in TASM2, but in TASM1 it was pretty well off.

The Lizard also went from being a really fun Spidey villain to a bore. Schumaucher of course also ruined Two-Face, Mister Freeze, Poison Ivy, and Batgirl, but that goes almost without saying.

And as much as I like the Singer X-Mne movies, that franchise really wasted and disserviced Cyclops, Storm, and Colossus. Gambit was also misused in XOW. But that whole movie is bad, so that seems almost moot to bring up.


Dude ! I had totally erased Tommy Lee Jones as Two-Face from my brain. I loved Carrey as the Riddler, because he was at least fun to watch (and the Riddler is a pretty ridiculous villain anyway), but TLJ was just ****ing painful
and ruined what can be considered one of Batman's top 5 enemies (luckily Aaron Eckhart did a great job in TDK).

I cringe just thinking of TLJ's "....AND ME !" ugh.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"