Has tom hanks ever played a villain? Ever? Literally the last (well known) person I would choose.
I guess 'The Ladykillers' counts in some odd way.
Has tom hanks ever played a villain? Ever? Literally the last (well known) person I would choose.
Isn't it time to update your sig?
Here is a suggestion that I personally haven't seen for the role of Lex. How about Neal McDonough?
None taken. I know that you are most likely correct, but nothing is official yet and I quite like the guy as an actor myself. I feel that he has a great look as well. I concede that he isn't the best suggestion, but he is someone different than all the usual suspects.No offence to the actor or your opinion, but I think they are looking for someone of a much higher calibre.
Isn't it time to update your sig?
leo was almost spider-man when jim cameron was doing that movie in the 90s.
and depp isn't really playing a brainiac type. transcendence seems like it's basically that episode of batman beyond called "lost soul" where a rich tycoon tries to live past his physical death in an AI form then tries to take over his grandson's body after "inhabiting" the batsuit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcendence_(2014_film)Caster's goal to acquire knowledge becomes one to acquire power, and he seems to be unstoppable.
McConaughey or DiCaprio are going to be their Plan Bs. They definitely want a name for the role.
I actually think Tom Hanks would make a phenomenal Luthor. Hanks usually plays such endearing characters, I imagine his Luthor on the surface would seem very likeable. Imagine how terrifying he would seem to the general audiance when he finally snaps, and shows his true nature...
I am aware that I'm in the minority here, but I don't think its as crazy a notion as some do.
You're not alone. I never thought of Hanks for the role because of his legend as a likeable persona, but when somebody first mentioned it in here, I couldn't clap hard enough. To me, Phoenix is without a shadow of a doubt, perfection, but Tom Hanks would certainly carve his name into that role and make it his own. I would totally welcome Hanks in that role. Hank's Luthor would be so mysterious in how he'd approach him that I actually want to see it, lol.
Yes, Lex should be likable on the outside, but inside he is and has always been a psychopath. That's what I want. I don't want any tragedy associated with him. He could be a good guy, but he's not. That's what I want to see. Someone is completely opposed to Superman's way of thinking.^ The evil bad@$$ MAKES the tragedy. Imagine a person who could spend all his technology and resources on making the world a better place, instead of discrediting or attempting to kill an alien with positive motives. But Luthor shouldn't be all mopey and sad, even if there were a tragic backstory (I'd rather not have a backstory for Luthor. Too much screentime, and it takes the mystery away.)
He should be likable on the outside, cold on the inside, but with flashes of anger.
As awesome as Tom Hanks would portray Lex, we've only had an older version of Lex in all of the Superman films. I want to finally see a younger version of the character on the big screen.
Good point. It'd be a nice subversion for a physically fit 40 something with an underlying attractiveness to take on the role.
Has tom hanks ever played a villain? Ever? Literally the last (well known) person I would choose.
I still need to see Captain Philips, my sister told me it was good.
Although my preference is for a younger Luthor (late 30's, mid 40's), I wouldn't be opppsed to Hanks only because he is actually a good actor and he's so likable that his Luthor would easily be able to fool the public. It would be fun seeing likable ole Tom Hanks play a completely evil loon.
"You" leaning towards Tom Hanks getting it means nothing because you aren't Warner Brothers or the director.