TheIrishAvenger
You are not special.
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2011
- Messages
- 6,888
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Superman: The Movie
Especially Steve and Peggy. Their chemistry is something else. MoS Lois and Clark are second.
You also know you're on the MOS board when The Batman is pulling his usual "I'm so above all the rest of these fanboys" crap.
You also know you're on the MOS board when The Batman is pulling his usual "I'm so above all the rest of these fanboys" crap.
Tony and Pepper were perfect in IM1, imo. For me, no other superhero pairing has come close to that kind of chemistry and rapport.
You know you're on the MOS board when MOS Clark/Lois beats out Tony/Pepper, Steve/Peggy, STM Clark/Lois, and Peter/Gwen in a "Best Couple" poll.
THIS. There's nothing quite like PepperOny and that's why they got my vote.
You also know you're on the MOS board when The Batman is pulling his usual "I'm so above all the rest of these fanboys" crap.
I mean...I would argue that Reeve/Kidder should always be #1 because every single other couple here owes their existance to what they established. Reeve/Kidder set the tone and others just copied it and tweaked it.
But I can tell you why I would still rank Man of Steel over the other couples.
1.) I like Pepper and Tony. But, to me, the first movie didn't really do anything to break down any untraditional paths. ::shrugs:: They were very cute but it wasn't something I hadn't seen done before. I didn't feel like I got a ton of Pepper's POV and the idea of the guy being older and more "snarky" didn't break down any gender lines for me or give me anything new. I liked the relationship better by Avengers but I wasn't sold after the first movie.
2.) Peter and Gwen were very sweet but they were also very YOUNG. I'm 30 years old so teenage love, while very CUTE to me, is never going to win any contests because that's not the place I'm in in my life anymore.
I also feel like the Spider-Man reboot has fallen victim a bit to one of the major problems with Peter and Gwen in that the relationship and Gwen herself gets canonized without any flaws because they KNOW that eventually they want to paint Gwen as the "tragic, perfect lost love." Often, Peter and gwen, cute as they are, fail to feel real to me because I feel like the writers are terrified to make Gwen a real person with faults because of her eventual demise. It's bothersome to me and it bothered me when I saw the film. So I wouldn't rank them up there. If anything, I woud put MJ and Peter from the original trilogy above them because MJ's POV was clear throughout the first movie and she was a fully realized woman with faults and flaws.
Steve and Peggy were amazing but it was also a doomed relationship so, again, you get a bit of romanticizing and canonization that goes along with it. I still love it though.
Lois and Clark, for better or worse, are presented as fully fledged adults and they both have flaws and faults in Man of Steel. They both change as people because of their interactions with each other. Neither are perfect. Neither are that YOUNG. Lois and Clark, crazy as it sounds, is a relationship between 30-somethings which is RARE AS CRAP in fiction these days. And we are just as the beginning.
I'm not saying that the others aren't great. I'm saying...I can understand why some people might still prefer the 30-something building blocks of Lois and Clark over the others whether it's the MOS board or not.
That lack of love for Peggy and Steve is disappointing. It is so much stronger then the others imo. Tony and Pepper have had more screen time, but I honestly couldn't tell you if they truly have feelings for one another.
I do really love the relationship between Steve and Peggy. I think the reason why that couple works because the relationship was never going to work. It was always in danger. That and throughout the course of the movie, they grew a mutual respect for each other.
Plus Hayley Atwell
While I would still put those couples ahead of MOS Lois/Clark, I think this was a good post and had good reasoning. I also liked that instead of whining about what I said, you simply made a good argument. I will say that if I put this exact poll on, say the "Misc Comic films" board, it would have different results.
Personally, on sheer chemistry alone, I put Tony/Pepper, STM Lois/Clark, Peter/Gwen, and Steve/Peggy ahead of MOS Clark/Lois, and that above all is what sells me on a CBM relationship. On a conceptual level, I understand where you're coming from.