Louis Leterrier dreams of a Avengers quadrilogy in one summer

Discussion in 'Marvel's The Avengers' started by Team Andino, Aug 10, 2009.

  1. Team Andino

    Team Andino The Paragon of Virtue

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    6,378
    Likes Received:
    0
    http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/08/09...avengers-quadrilogy-released-over-one-summer/

    I think its a bit much but I like the enthusiasm in him.
     
    #1
  2. Kent

    Kent The Lord of Thwipp

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2000
    Messages:
    14,098
    Likes Received:
    0
    There's no way in hell this would ever happen. I mean 0% chance.
     
    #2
  3. Casius--J

    Casius--J Web Master

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2004
    Messages:
    3,728
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yeah its doubtful but it will probably be one of the biggest events in movie history if it did.

    I'm 100% sold on this idea, I would love to see four movies based on the avengers showing different perspectives of the characters.

    Its also good to see that the film makers involved are really passionate about these stories.
     
    #3
  4. FaT_tONle

    FaT_tONle Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2006
    Messages:
    14,549
    Likes Received:
    0
    Two words... Civil War. Film all the films back to back and release the trilogy within a year or a little over a year... July, December, then May the following year.
     
    #4
  5. luke1234

    luke1234 World Sick

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2007
    Messages:
    3,371
    Likes Received:
    0
    Civil War stunk though, I wish, God do i wish this would happen. Could you imagine a Quadrilogy all in one. Damn. No way itll happen but still one can dream
     
    #5
  6. The Chris

    The Chris TDK Trilogy Forever!

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2007
    Messages:
    7,279
    Likes Received:
    10
    This idea is completely awesome. Pretty unlikely, but I love it. 4 films in one franchise with one story arc in one summer, and from four different directors? I like it, a lot.
     
    #6
  7. Son of Coul

    Son of Coul Not 100% A Dick

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2009
    Messages:
    4,943
    Likes Received:
    0
    I love Louis, so enthusiastic and ambitious. I hope they don't shaft him from working on Avengers.
     
    #7
  8. catintheengine

    catintheengine Registered Rhymnicologist

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Messages:
    259
    Likes Received:
    0
    I like it a lot. It's a great idea.

    Do I think it will happen? Not likely.

    Two films, filmed back to back/together, released a couple of months apart is a very real possibility.

    I'd be happy either way, but it would be nice to have all four directors get to work on it though.

    But like I said, it's much more likely we get two of them clocking in at two hours each. Release one in May, the next in July.

    I agree that it's great to see such enthusiasm about the project.
     
    #8
  9. jmc

    jmc away for a while

    Joined:
    May 20, 2007
    Messages:
    32,313
    Likes Received:
    60
    Will never happen. Would be a logistical nightmare, besides what if the first movie sucks, then what?
     
    #9
  10. calibud

    calibud Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2006
    Messages:
    168
    Likes Received:
    0

    I agree with the "logistical nightmare" part. They're all going to end up being four very different movies. The only things connecting them being Nick Fury and other minor cameos.

    They are going to need a fifth director. Someone who won't imitate any styles of the previous movies and someone who can seamlessly blend the ideas of all four directors (naturally I would hope they plan on personally collaborating at some point) without making it seem like a freak show. The Avengers film still feels pretty unreal yet it's so close to happening. I'm only afraid that it's going to feel very off because of the differing tones in the films. I am glad they've been planning this for the last couple of years. The Avengers is not something to decide on after seeing how Capt America does. It's absolutely necessary to run a thread through all four characters' franchises.

    And I don't know if anyone else mentioned this but the idea of all four actually directing (something which Letterier did not even mention) is not happening. They will collaborate. But none who are members will forfeit their DGA membership (and hence their titled credibility as filmmakers) to co-direct The Avengers.
     
    #10
  11. topdog1

    topdog1 Hero For Hire

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    1,134
    Likes Received:
    0
    This would confuse the hell out of the box office. They would almost be competing with themselves and would need to make each film stand on its own. It's just silly talk and nothing more. They need to (and will) focus on making one epic film that will destroy all others and all competition. Iron Man's popularity makes that a sure bet.

    LL did a great job on Incredible Hulk. I wish Marvel had let him keep some of those deleted scenes in play. Watching the DVD extras and listening to his commentary, he shows he's VERY intelligent and a very good director. I'm looking forward to Clash of the Titans solely based on that fact. Marvel was smart to lock him up for multiple movies.
     
    #11
  12. Katsuro

    Katsuro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2005
    Messages:
    5,616
    Likes Received:
    0
    It's an interesting concept, but I cant imagine it actually happening. I dont think anything like that's even been done before, really. One movie, split into 4 parts, with each part focusing on a different character, all released in a single summer.
     
    #12
  13. tamron

    tamron Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2001
    Messages:
    3,107
    Likes Received:
    0
    It's an ambitious and exciting idea, but as everyone has said, it's also very implausible.
     
    #13
  14. JackIvyGB

    JackIvyGB Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2009
    Messages:
    412
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't think he's neccessarily saying one character for each film. I think he means that all 4 films would add up to a 5-6 hour movie by the end of the summer. Basically one big movie, split up into 4 parts, each directed by a different solo avenger director.

    I think it's a brilliant idea, but that's coming from a fan who is going strictly off of wanting as much as he can get in one summer.
    It's definitely a situation where you have a negative point for every good point you get. I could see it turning out sweet as long as a solid story and vision was agreed upon. I don't think that directorial styles will conflict with how the movie turns out that much. It's like he said, TV series have different directors for different episodes. Can you really pick out which ones are different if you didn't know the credits and the director didn't really suck worse than the others? So far, at least Louis and Jon have knocked it out of the park. If the others show they have the goods as well, there's no reason a collaboration wouldn't turn out good, as long as they keep in touch and know what each other's doing. Essentially it's a giant group project, but since they'll be seperate films in the end, it won't conflict with any DGA shenanigans. They could assign the directors according to their talents as well. Maybe Louis could direct the 4th part if it ends in an epic battle. The length of the film would be beneficial as well, not only as far as each character getting enough development and screen time (especially if the Pyms aren't introduced until the Avengers film), but let's say (and this is a hypothetical, so don't jump on me, any 616 fanboys/Ultimates haters) they decided to do a story that followed the Ultimates. They could have the first part be forming the team and Hulk going off the handle, but there could be an overall arch of the Hulk redeeming himself and they could include the next volume with the Chitauri/skrull invasion and a HUGE final battle, with the Banner bringing the Hulk under his full control and finally proving himself as 100% hero, and have a cool scene after the fight with everyone standing around and Janet saying "well, I think we're officially Superheroes." And it'd be cool for the first 3 films to have an after credits scene that is like a next episode preview like a TV show ("Next time on THE AVENGERS: ").

    But like I said, for every positive there's a negative. I don't think the films will neccessarily compete with themselves, since it's technically one split up film and all the money comes back to the same studio, but you do have to worry about how long it would take to film it. Not necessarily for the directors, since they would do their part and be done and would only need to be a phone call away for consultation, leaving them free to work on any other projects they want, but for the actors. They'd need to be pretty dedicated to the role for that kind of work load. It takes a year for one movie, how long would it take for one 3 times that length?! Not to mention if they did go through with it, how long would it be between films (not between each chapter of that summer's story, but between each story itself)? How ready would they be to jump back into their respective hero's boots, which brings up the issue of more solo films happening in between?
    Personally, I could live with some of the characters only showing up in avengers films from now on, but I'm sure many would disagree and I'm sure that isn't the plan anyway.

    So, in the end, it's one of those "in a perfect world" scenarios. For real though, the negatives unfortunately balance the positives, and I think Marvel likes playing with better odds.

    Either way, I don't think there are any doubts as to the directors at least collaborating and keeping in touch with each other (and whoever directs avengers if it's someone new) on a creative level if it's not possible for them all to co-direct. I'm sure there'll be some sort of massive round table meeting with writers, producers, directors, etc., an "assembling of the avengers" of sorts (if they haven't done it already), before it goes into full on production to get everyone on the boat before they hand it off to the guy and get going.
     
    #14
  15. Sarg92

    Sarg92 Ouch!

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    2,389
    Likes Received:
    0
    The way I see it is that they could have one big script written up and have it split up into four parts which each continue after the other.

    Then assign each part to a director and shoot the film as normal. Like Leterrier said, the same sets and actors would be used but they just change director for each part.
     
    #15
  16. CBGB

    CBGB Urban Achiever

    Joined:
    May 24, 2006
    Messages:
    2,036
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm pretty sure the Hype would be down all summer if that happened. Comic book fans heads around the world would explode.
     
    #16
  17. catintheengine

    catintheengine Registered Rhymnicologist

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Messages:
    259
    Likes Received:
    0
    JackIvyGB, I think that you and I are pretty much thinking a lot of the same things. One giant ass Avengers film (even if it is split up, it's essentially one movie) would allow greater depth of character for newly introduced characters like the Pyms or Clint Barton. Not that I'd want them to take center stage, but still - character depth is a good thing. (IF it was going to happen, which I doubt, I would want the release of the DVD/Blu-Ray all at once...don't make me buy a separate disc for each part of the movie, sell it to me all at once at a higher price. You see how forward thinking I am? :woot:)

    Like everyone's saying, it's probably not going to happen.

    But, let us not forget - Samuel L. Jackson IS signed on for nine Marvel movies. Hmmm.



    Assuming, however, that it's going to be one movie, not split-up, it's going to have to be at least two-hours.
     
    #17
  18. Danalys

    Danalys Sol Invictus

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2002
    Messages:
    12,562
    Likes Received:
    0
    i actually said in a thread ages ago that it could be cool if the avengers had a collaboration of directors. each one could do the parts that play to their strengths. i didn't think of doing four films simultaneously tho.

    to do this they would have to have a two year gap after captain america. each actor basically does a solo film amount of work thats cut between the films. so everyone gets their hero moments. without the films just being hero moment after hero moment. they can stagger when the actors arrive to the show. the first actor would finish say a month after the last actor had arrived. giving them that month to do scenes with all the principles together.
     
    #18

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"