• Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version.
  • X/Twitter

    Due to recent news involving X, formerly Twitter and its owner, the staff of SuperHeroHype have decided it would be best to no longer allow links on the board. Starting January 31st, users will no longer be able to post direct links to X on this site, however screenshots will still be allowed as long as they follow Hype rules and guidelines.

    We apologize for any inconvenience.

Love real or only true in movies and fairy tales

Love real or not

  • No way

  • yes


Results are only viewable after voting.
hunter rider said:
Love isn't a belief it's a fact ,we can all feel it just how we idnetify with it and deal with it just differs

Facts can be proven
 
BRUTAL said:
Facts can be proven

Bella just gave you the proof,couples all over the world are proof of it,it may not last and ppl's personalities can eventually get in the way of it but it's there
 
DBella said:
Infatuation doesn't last very long. I know what infatuation is. Been there. I felt that way everyday for 5 years for only one person. And my parents felt that way for each other for all the time they were together until my Dad's passed away. For more than 3 decades. I am sure they were infatuated with each other, just like I was, but it's more than that.

Maybe your experiences in infatuation haven't lasted that long...


How is it more?
 
I have no problem with the cynics who don't believe in "love" and would rather classify it as childish infatuation or a "laughable matter", but don't put down those who do by trying to trivialize their "faith" as insignificant, like they don't know any better.
 
DBella said:
I have no problem with the cynics who don't believe in "love" and would rather classify it as childish infatuation or a "laughable matter", but don't put down those who do by trying to trivialize their "faith" as insignificant, like they don't know any better.

Apologies. I'm not saying that there isn't anything wrong or trival with 'love', and the world would be a lot worst off without it. I just don't think there is anything 'true' about it.
 
DBella said:
I have no problem with the cynics who don't believe in "love" and would rather classify it as childish infatuation or a "laughable matter", but don't put down those who do by trying to trivialize their "faith" as insignificant, like they don't know any better.

I :heart: U.
 
DBella said:
I have no problem with the cynics who don't believe in "love" and would rather classify it as childish infatuation or a "laughable matter", but don't put down those who do by trying to trivialize their "faith" as insignificant, like they don't know any better.

The interesting thing is that giving the feelings another name isn't proof either
 
PROOF = Tangible evidence, leaving no doubt. In a court of law, "couples all over the world" "feeling something" would be catagorized as hearsay would it?
 
DBella said:
I have no problem with the cynics who don't believe in "love" and would rather classify it as childish infatuation or a "laughable matter", but don't put down those who do by trying to trivialize their "faith" as insignificant, like they don't know any better.

I'm not putting anyone down. YOU qouted my post that STARTED with "In my opinion"... how is that putting down? If anything I'M the one being judged here.

OOPS, not directed at me... my bad... no hard feelins :up:
 
BRUTAL said:
Maybe your experiences in infatuation haven't lasted that long...


How is it more?
It's more because when two people love each they do not give up on the relationship at a little sign of trouble. It's a partnership. They realize that no one is perfect and prone to make mistakes and the problems so they work with each other over the mistakes to make their relationship stronger. There is faith and loyalty. To me, an infatuation is just mostly a foolish, extravagant passion that fades. Love doesn't fade but only grows stronger with each moment you spend with each other, through good times and bad times.
 
BRUTAL said:
PROOF = Tangible evidence, leaving no doubt. In a court of law, "couples all over the world" "feeling something" would be catagorized as hearsay would it?

Then likewise you trying to pass it off as infatuation is proofless also,i guess if you don't wanna let yourself be open for it that's cool
 
BRUTAL said:
I'm not putting anyone down. YOU qouted my post that STARTED with "In my opinion"... how is that putting down? If anything I'M the one being judged here.
Did I mention you? When I was quoting you, I was talking about something else. Don't have to get defensive. I respect your opinion and you're entitled to them.
 
People don't care about my story and i poured my heart out.:csad:

8GOES TO SOB NOW*
 
hunter rider said:
Then likewise you trying to pass it off as infatuation is proofless also,i guess if you don't wanna let yourself be open for it that's cool

Infatuation CAN be defined AND proven, and one of the many definitons of love IS... (drumroll)... INFATUATION.

DBella said:
It's more because when two people love each they do not give up on the relationship at a little sign of trouble. It's a partnership. They realize that no one is perfect and prone to make mistakes and the problems so they work with each other over the mistakes to make their relationship stronger. There is faith and loyalty. To me, an infatuation is just mostly a foolish, extravagant passion that fades. Love doesn't fade but only grows stronger with each moment you spend with each other, through good times and bad times.

First of all you're are right... it is YOUR opinion, which does differ from mine. In my opinion you said it a bunch of time, it's not this fairy tale "feeling" it's an agreement, a partnership, a relationship, it's a mutual understanding.
 
J Alba's Lover said:
People don't care about my story and i poured my heart out.:csad:

8GOES TO SOB NOW*

I honestly missed your post JAL.

J Alba's Lover said:
I would like to say i would like to think so but i don't. And if it does you'll only have it for a short amount of time before something happens.

J Alba's Lover said:
Yes i have been. Her name was Marie.
Sure we were only like 15 or so at the time. But she loved me and i loved her. Than about a year later she moved away and i never saw her again. Oh not let's not forget that a little while after that i got in a car accident. I was pretty banged up. So don't tell me i don't know what it is.

And learn to read. I didn't say you specifically didn't know, I questioned if you had.

But if you want to get technical about it, you were 15 at the time, most people that age, it is a lot of times puppy love. A lot of people when they move past high school and college realize how insignificant most of their relationships back then were.

I'm not trying to downplay your story but if you are basing your view on women, love and relationships on a high school romance over 10 years ago? Let's just say you shouldn't be so jaded.
 
DBella said:
So what do non-romantics and non-adolescents feel if not "love"? What do you call that feeling when you are absolutely attracted to someone in every way that you want to be with that person all the time if you can. That when you are not with that person you pine for them and miss them dearly that your heart ache and he/she is all you can think about. And when you are with that person, it feels like the greatest feeling in the world. The sight of that person gives you funny feelings in your tummy and the touch from that person makes you feel like you're the happiest person alive. What is that?
I call it pheromones.
 
For most things I do as well... now go wash your face, get a tan, stop cutting yourself, and go get some clothes that fit.
 
BRUTAL said:
Infatuation CAN be defined AND proven, and one of the many definitons of love IS... (drumroll)... INFATUATION.
.

Infatuation is possesive,love is trust,they aren't the same so if you can identify infatuation it's just as easy to define love
 
J Alba's Lover said:
I'm not emo DAMNIT!

Well you dated a girl 10 years ago, maybe you should date a woman before you make a judgement about women, dating and relationships?
 
hunter rider said:
Infatuation is possesive,love is trust,they aren't the same so if you can identify infatuation it's just as easy to define love

So if I trust something it's love? That's a lot more simple then what I had always thought. I thought the idea of love was infinitley complex. But it's a simple as trust? I LOVE my car... it gets me to work.

Infatuation is traditionally defined as "Foolish and usually extravagant passion or admiration." I think I could identify Infatuation pretty easily.

If love is as simple as trust then I think you're right, I could identify that as well.

All I have been saying is that this idea of love is too complex to be summarized by one overused word. Society throws this word around to mean everything from a slight affinity towards something to the most powerful force a human being can feel. I choose not to use that word and I choose not to believe in a fairy-tale idea of floating on clouds and hearing angels when I'm with someone. My opinion that's all...
 
J Alba's Loverl said:
Well i wish it was that easy for me but its not. We all can't be studs like you now can we?

Dude...

You haven't dated in 10 years... I don't want you on my team anymore... anyone wanna trade?
 
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"