Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]519817[/split]
From what I've seen on Twitter, it was just Jeff Sessions, and the human poopstain Pat Robertson said it was "macho" to do it too. Just...oh my god.Republican Congressmen are saying they don't know if doing what he said he did on the tape would qualify as sexual assault... FOR **** SAKE!!!!!!!!!!!!![]()
On Chris Hayes, there was at least one another person who said he wasn't sure, and he isn't a lawyer.From what I've seen on Twitter, it was just Jeff Sessions, and the human poopstain Pat Robertson said it was "macho" to do it too. Just...oh my god.
Correct. This isn't a thread for supporting Trump. There may have been some stragglers here and there but they got chased out.Just to clarify: most ppl here don't support Trump, right???
Just to clarify: most ppl here don't support Trump, right???
This thread is about as supportive to Trump as the BvS general discussion thread was about supporting BvS back in April.
No one was "chased out", but plenty have got themselves banned.Correct. This isn't a thread for supporting Trump. There may have been some stragglers here and there but they got chased out.![]()
I prefer to think of people not as anti-supportive of Trump, but supportive of common decency.
This thread is about as supportive to Drumpf as the BvS general discussion thread was about supporting BvS back in April.
The Russians [newspapers] were quoting two sentences from a 10,000 word piece I wrote for Newsweek, which Blumenthal had emailed to Podesta. There was no mistaking that Blumenthal was citing Newsweekthe magazines name and citations for photographs appeared throughout the attached article. The Russians had carefully selected the of course paragraph, which mentions there were legitimate points of criticism regarding Clinton and Benghazi, all of which had been acknowledged in nine reports about the terror attack and by the former Secretary of State herself. But that was hardly the point of the story, Benghazi Biopsy: A Comprehensive Guide to One of Americas Worst Political Outrages. The piece is about the obscene politicization of the assault that killed four Americans, and the article slammed the Republican Benghazi committee which was engaged in a political show trial disguised as a Congressional investigationthe tenth inquiry into the tragedy......
At a rally in Wilkes Barre, Pennsylvania, Trump spoke while holding a document in his hand. He told the assembled crowd that it was an email from Blumenthal, whom he called sleazy Sidney.
This just came out a little while ago, Trump said. I have to tell you this. And then he read the words from my article.
This is not funny. It is terrifying. The Russians engage in a sloppy disinformation effort and, before the day is out, the Republican nominee for president is standing on a stage reciting the manufactured story as truth. How did this happen? Who in the Trump campaign was feeding him falsehoods straight from the Kremlin?
Just as many people who didn't like Hillary and even still don't - would vote for her to keep Trump out.I think some Trump supporters are more "anyone but Hilary" than legitimately liking him.
Also, looks like Trump is an unwitting (????) agent for Russian hackers.
http://www.newsweek.com/vladimir-pu...-clinton-donald-trump-benghazi-sputnik-508635
Just as many people who didn't like Hillary and even still don't - would vote for her to keep Trump out.
News magazine.What's Newsweek?
I dislike Hillary. That doesn't mean that I am going to support cinnamon Hitler.
Hell, I doubt Hitler could have gotten elected if he was caught saying he likes to molest women. Weimar Germany has higher standards than the GOP.
This thread is about as supportive to Trump as the BvS general discussion thread was about supporting BvS back in April.