Two blockbusters opening is not enough of an excuse for a drop in the 70% range. SR didn't even have a drop that steep despite going up against stiff competition of its own.
Big drop off this weekend is expected - why am I not surprised?
And for anyone who wants to say "But it had a lot of competition!" - Superman Returns also had big competition (Pirates of the Caribbean 2) but managed to drop 58% the following weekend. 71% is VERY steep no matter how you slice it.
With all this arguing over box office, you'd think people here personally wrote checks financing the budget.
This isn't some no name franchise. It's Superman. It's the franchise. Everything was clicking. The trailers were there, the marketing was there, the interest was there. It was the most talked about movie all summer. People were ready for it. That's why it opened huge.
I'm sorry, but I just don't see how you can place the blame on WWZ or MU. Those films shouldn't be competition for Superman. A great Superman movie that captured the hearts and minds of the public like the original did would have absolutely dominated the box office from here on out.
The buzz for this movie stopped once everyone got a chance to see it. It's that simple.
Oh LoisAt the end of the day it's all about Dick measuring.
MOS had $168,790,947 after 1 week.
SR had $170,967,498 after 3 weeks.
The %drop doesn't matter it's the gross that counts.
robot the problem with your argument is that you're starting with the (completely debatable) premise that MoS is a) definitely an awesome movie with b) great word of mouth and working backwards from there. you're simply choosing the evidence that tends to support your decidedly unproven assumptions and ignoring everything else. Its an inherently weak and flawed rhetorical strategy that is the opposite of persuasive. sorry.
i won't even bother addressing the glaring problems with your whole "scheduling mishap" theory. Res ipsa loquitur.
Very true. The early projection on friday was 19M. But tbe actual is only 13M. That's huge different here. Is the number r correct?
$17-19M was basically Nikki making up s**t. She's hardly ever reliable.
56% is rotten but also look at the the average critic rating 6.3/10. ask fanboys and they'll tell you MOS is a 9/10. based on 71% drop i's say 6/10 is about right. 71% is worse then green lanters dropThe movie has 56% on RT. I have not watched the movie but that rating means mixed reactions.
So who's right?? The 56% or the 44%? The critics can not be right because they are divided.
This statement doesn't make any sense.
71% was the drop for the 2nd FRIDAY .. IM3 dropped 72% on its 2nd Friday .. get ur facts straight before shootin' ur mouth off
This isn't some no name franchise. It's Superman. It's the franchise. Everything was clicking. The trailers were there, the marketing was there, the interest was there. It was the most talked about movie all summer. People were ready for it. That's why it opened huge.
I'm sorry, but I just don't see how you can place the blame on WWZ or MU. Those films shouldn't be competition for Superman. A great Superman movie that captured the hearts and minds of the public like the original did would have absolutely dominated the box office from here on out.
The buzz for this movie stopped once everyone got a chance to see it. It's that simple.
It was actually 14-16 from Rth over at Box Office who tends to be much more accurate. Nineteen was the high end/best case from a much less consistent source.
56% is rotten but also look at the the average critic rating 6.3/10. ask fanboys and they'll tell you MOS is a 9/10. based on 71% drop i's say 6/10 is about right. 71% is worse then green lanters drop
I'm not buying that until it actually happened. That would be a 140-170% increase from Thursday which usually doesn't happen in June, May sure but not June. I know NBA Finals depressed things but that's still pushing it.