Marsden Talks Cyclops and XMen Spinoffs

[narrows101]

http://www.movieweb.com/news/40/14040.php


EXCLUSIVE: James Marsden Talks Cyclops and X-Men Spinoffs

During a recent press event for his new film, 10th & Wolf, James Marsden talked about returning to the X-Men franchise for any sequels or spinoffs on our favorite mutants.

We asked James about a spinoff for his character of Cyclops; he kind of danced around the subject, but did say, "Yeah, I think this is going to be - no, no, I, um - I have no idea. I don't think that they're doing a Cyclops spin-off, but, if they're doing a 4th one, I don't know, I doubt it. I think they're just going forward with the Wolverine spin-off, I think with Hugh (Jackman)."

Even though it's supposedly a prequel for Wolverine, James said he'd love to join the cast if he's asked. "It's prior to our meeting in the first film. Yeah, I feel very lucky to be a part of those films and great affection for the comics and for those characters and I feel very lucky to be a part of it and I would. If they'd have me, I'd be a part of everyone they did."

Wolverine is set for a 2007 release; currently David Ayer is re-wrting the orginal David Benioff script.

As far as 10th & Wolf, James stars as a former Marine, who returns to his life as a member of the mob 'family' in Philadelphia. The film is loosely based on the true story of the real life Donny Brasco. His castmates include Giovanni Ribisi, Brad Renfro, and Piper Perabo. The film is written and directed by Bobby Moresco from Crash.

10th & Wolf hits theaters August 18th; it's rated R.

 

[ntcrawler]

Isn't this guy great? His talent and enthusiasm are hard to beat, and he's actually a fan of his work and the source material. A combo that's hard to find, and hard to beat!

 

[LastSunrise1981]

http://www.movieweb.com/news/40/14040.php


EXCLUSIVE: James Marsden Talks Cyclops and X-Men Spinoffs

During a recent press event for his new film, 10th & Wolf, James Marsden talked about returning to the X-Men franchise for any sequels or spinoffs on our favorite mutants.

We asked James about a spinoff for his character of Cyclops; he kind of danced around the subject, but did say, "Yeah, I think this is going to be - no, no, I, um - I have no idea. I don't think that they're doing a Cyclops spin-off, but, if they're doing a 4th one, I don't know, I doubt it. I think they're just going forward with the Wolverine spin-off, I think with Hugh (Jackman)."

Even though it's supposedly a prequel for Wolverine, James said he'd love to join the cast if he's asked. "It's prior to our meeting in the first film. Yeah, I feel very lucky to be a part of those films and great affection for the comics and for those characters and I feel very lucky to be a part of it and I would. If they'd have me, I'd be a part of everyone they did."

Wolverine is set for a 2007 release; currently David Ayer is re-wrting the orginal David Benioff script.

As far as 10th & Wolf, James stars as a former Marine, who returns to his life as a member of the mob 'family' in Philadelphia. The film is loosely based on the true story of the real life Donny Brasco. His castmates include Giovanni Ribisi, Brad Renfro, and Piper Perabo. The film is written and directed by Bobby Moresco from Crash.

10th & Wolf hits theaters August 18th; it's rated R.

Does Fox really believe that the Wolverine spin-off is going to do that great?

They should take note with Elektra, as that movie was a flop and didn't do all that well in the box office. No one(IMO) is going to see this Wolverine like they would see Spider-Man, Batman, LOTR, or even Harry Potter.

Then again, I hope Wolverine does flop, because that'll be the ultimate redemption for Marsden and Cyclops.

 

[ntcrawler]

Does Fox really believe that the Wolverine spin-off is going to do that great?

They should take note with Elektra, as that movie was a flop and didn't do all that well in the box office. No one(IMO) is going to see this Wolverine like they would see Spider-Man, Batman, LOTR, or even Harry Potter.

I think what the bean counters don't realize is that Wolverine may be the biggest star (at least to them), but his fame and money-making potential still pales in comparison to a team-oriented group film. It's not going to make more money than X2 or X3.

Then again, I hope Wolverine does flop, because that'll be the ultimate redemption for Marsden and Cyclops.

I'll say only this. Seeing Wolverine on screen may make people happy. But to see Cyclops appear on screen and redeem himself, THAT would spout cheers of joy and whoop whoops of delight. Wolverine may be the most popular char as far as the general audience is concerned, but at this point, Cyclops is the one that fans would most want to see.

 

[Deep Thinkin'!]

Yet again they say something about there being a fourth X-Men movie. How interesting, no? This only makes me more confident of there being a X4.

haha, I love James.

 

[chaseter]

Hooray for more ambiguous news about a character and future films...

 

[javon]

We asked James about a spinoff for his character of Cyclops; he kind of danced around the subject, but did say, "Yeah, I think this is going to be - no, no, I, um - I have no idea. I don't think that they're doing a Cyclops spin-off, but, if they're doing a 4th one, I don't know, I doubt it. I think they're just going forward with the Wolverine spin-off, I think with Hugh (Jackman)."

A.K.A No. How the heck could he "think" it's with Hugh. Thats common sense.

 

[danoyse]

Does Fox really believe that the Wolverine spin-off is going to do that great?

Yes. Not on the scale of another X-Men sequel, but the Wolverine movie is planned to a smaller origin movie, so if they do it right it should do pretty well.

The idea in ending the X-Men movies at X3 was so they could spend less money making smaller spinoffs and keep making money from the franchise.

They should take note with Elektra, as that movie was a flop and didn't do all that well in the box office. No one(IMO) is going to see this Wolverine like they would see Spider-Man, Batman, LOTR, or even Harry Potter.

Not really...Elektra was spun off from a movie that made less in it's entire domestic run than X3 did in it's opening weekend. It's a much more recognizable character with movie audiences.

And I think they'd all be kidding themselves to think Wolverine is as popular as Spiderman, Batman, LOTR or Harry Potter. I don't think that's the plan.


On a related note...nice interview with James Marsden.

 

[TNC9852002]

Does Fox really believe that the Wolverine spin-off is going to do that great?

They should take note with Elektra, as that movie was a flop and didn't do all that well in the box office. No one(IMO) is going to see this Wolverine like they would see Spider-Man, Batman, LOTR, or even Harry Potter.

Then again, I hope Wolverine does flop, because that'll be the ultimate redemption for Marsden and Cyclops.

Yeah, you clearly just have something against Wolverine personally.

I say this because Wolverine is like, ten times more popular than Elektra...Believe it or not, people love the character. Elektra had only one supporting role in a comic movie (which wasn't a big hit), yet Wolverine was a main character in three popular comic movies. People know him now.

I expect the spin-off to do very well. I predict that it'll make numbers between X1 and X2's gross.

-TNC

 

[Loganbabe]

I think what the bean counters don't realize is that Wolverine may be the biggest star (at least to them), but his fame and money-making potential still pales in comparison to a team-oriented group film. It's not going to make more money than X2 or X3.

It would be more honest to say you expect the movie to flop.
But it won´t flop. Wolverine is a well-know and loved character, Hugh is an amazing actor, so unless they hire a guy like McG to direct it, it will do great.
I don´t care if it´ll make more money than the X movies...actually I really hope it´ll be a darker, more indie-looking (and less profitable) type of movie.

Wolverine may be the most popular char as far as the general audience is concerned, but at this point, Cyclops is the one that fans would most want to see.

Not this fan here, thank you.

 

[ntcrawler]

It would be more honest to say you expect the movie to flop.

no, I don't expect the movie to flop. I don't expect to be as successful as X3. Stop putting words in my mouth

But it won´t flop. Wolverine is a well-know and loved character, Hugh is an amazing actor, so unless they hire a guy like McG to direct it, it will do great.
I don´t care if it´ll make more money than the X movies...actually I really hope it´ll be a darker, more indie-looking (and less profitable) type of movie.

I'm sure it'll be a cult classic at least, like BladeRunner if it's dark enough. But considering it's supposed to be another summer popcorn blockbuster, don't keep your hopes too high for the darkness part.

Not this fan here, thank you.

Oh suck it up! Cyclops is good for Jean, he's good to the X-men, and he'll be good for you too! We got our fill of Wolverine, now it's only fair you see other fan's favorite chars too! :P

 

[AznBABYBANDIT]

Does Fox really believe that the Wolverine spin-off is going to do that great?

They should take note with Elektra, as that movie was a flop and didn't do all that well in the box office. No one(IMO) is going to see this Wolverine like they would see Spider-Man, Batman, LOTR, or even Harry Potter.

Then again, I hope Wolverine does flop, because that'll be the ultimate redemption for Marsden and Cyclops.

Sorry I'm late... but Wolverine is their money cow... They would invest on him...

 

[AznBABYBANDIT]

Yeah, you clearly just have something against Wolverine personally.

I say this because Wolverine is like, ten times more popular than Elektra...Believe it or not, people love the character. Elektra had only one supporting role in a comic movie (which wasn't a big hit), yet Wolverine was a main character in three popular comic movies. People know him now.

I expect the spin-off to do very well. I predict that it'll make numbers between X1 and X2's gross.

-TNC

Indeed, IMC ( Hong Kong ) the Wolverine figues were gone on the first day... therefore i cant complete my collection >.< Sigh... getting it soon online

 

[bexta89]

Gotta love the guy!

 

[Avalanche]

Does Fox really believe that the Wolverine spin-off is going to do that great?

They should take note with Elektra, as that movie was a flop and didn't do all that well in the box office. No one(IMO) is going to see this Wolverine like they would see Spider-Man, Batman, LOTR, or even Harry Potter.

Then again, I hope Wolverine does flop, because that'll be the ultimate redemption for Marsden and Cyclops.

Elektra was a flop because Elektra was a very, very bad movie. Aside from that, Elektra and Jennifer Garner don't have anywhere near the following that Wolverine and Hugh Jackman do.

 

[flavio_lebeau]

Well, to know the popularity of actors here in Brazil, i always wait for the movie get to TV. When thye do the tv ads for a program called "Hot Screen" (which plays the best and newest movies) they always say during the ad "Movie with [insert Star name] and [insert other Star name]".
Both X1 and X2 only say "Movie with Halle Berry''. Which shows Hugh isnt that known here. Jen Gardner also doesnt appear in the ads of any movie containing her yet...

 

[Theweepeople]

It's not going to make more money than X2 or X3.

Don't forget that it won't make more money than X1. I recently found discovered that Wolverine will be rated R. That rating will have a huge impact on how much money the film will make considering that not a single comic book film with an R rating has made over 100 million domestically. Parents won't be taking their kids to see Wolverine. Does Fox really believe they're going to make a lot of money from this film that is geared to an audience of 17 years of age and above? Without the financial impact of the family element this film will probably struggle to make 100 million.

 

[Theweepeople]

Here is a list of Rated R comic book movies that either made around 100 million domestically or less.

The Punisher 55 million
Constantine 76 million
Road to Perdition 104 million
V for Vendetta 70 million
Spawn 54 million
A History of Violence 31 million
Blade 70 milllion
Blade 2 82 million
Blade 3 52 million
Sin City 74 million

 

[Obsidian]

Does Fox really believe that the Wolverine spin-off is going to do that great?

They should take note with Elektra, as that movie was a flop and didn't do all that well in the box office. No one(IMO) is going to see this Wolverine like they would see Spider-Man, Batman, LOTR, or even Harry Potter.

Then again, I hope Wolverine does flop, because that'll be the ultimate redemption for Marsden and Cyclops.

Will it fail? Maybe. Could it be a big box office hit? Perhaps. It's really up in the air on the success (both critically and financially) of the Wolverine spinoff. It all depends on whether FOX takes it's takes its time and doesn't rush production, we could see a quality movie. Then there's marketing and how much enthusiasm the general audience has for a solo film of "Wolverine".

 

[the a1ant]

As much as I'd love an R-rated Wolverine film, I think it'd be smarter to make the thing PG-13 for theaters (to make maximum profit), then release an unrated version on DVD with extra violence Wolverine is a violent character, but it's still an X-Men universe film, and they should try to keep that same audience with their spin-off projects, IMO.

 

[LastSunrise1981]

Yeah, you clearly just have something against Wolverine personally.

I say this because Wolverine is like, ten times more popular than Elektra...Believe it or not, people love the character. Elektra had only one supporting role in a comic movie (which wasn't a big hit), yet Wolverine was a main character in three popular comic movies. People know him now.

I expect the spin-off to do very well. I predict that it'll make numbers between X1 and X2's gross.

-TNC

I don't have anything against Wolverine. What I have against is the overexposure of the character. Do they really think that just because it's Wolverine it'll do well?

It's not going to do that well. Will it do good? Maybe. But will it do great? No. People aren't going to flock to see him go berserker all the time. And another thing to keep in mind is that his story is too dark, too complex, and too violent for the little kiddies.

Then again, that will only hurt its chances if it's rated R. What I'm saying is that Wolverine, as a character, is overexposed and I can't help but feel that Fox/Rothman will give Wolverine the attention, money, focus, and love that he never gave any of the X-Men movies. That is what has me angry and bitter about this Wolverine project.

Wolverine is not Spider-Man, Batman, Lord of the Rings, Harry Potter, or even POTC 2. I just don't see the mainstream audience flocking to see a Wolverine movie, especially if they see something better is coming out.

 

[danoyse]

Don't forget that it won't make more money than X1. I recently found discovered that Wolverine will be rated R. That rating will have a huge impact on how much money the film will make considering that not a single comic book film with an R rating has made over 100 million domestically. Parents won't be taking their kids to see Wolverine. Does Fox really believe they're going to make a lot of money from this film that is geared to an audience of 17 years of age and above? Without the financial impact of the family element this film will probably struggle to make 100 million.

No, nothing has been confirmed that Wolverine will be rated R. Odds are, it won't be, taking into consideration the average age of the audience.

Here's what Hugh Jackman (who's producing as well as starring) had to say on the subject in the June issue of "Starlog":

"I'm sure we'll have pressure to make it a PG-13 movie, but there's also a case for doing an R-rated 'Wolverine'. These are the sort of decisions we'll have to discuss....Truth be told, if you really want to tell Wolverine's story, you're going to have to make the movie pretty heavy at times. But can you make that PG-13? Some directors I've spoken to say, 'Oh, let's make this R-rated.' I can see that film (in my head), but there are other 'Wolverine' movies, too.

I run into kids every day who love this character. At Halloween, I see little Wolverines going around. I don't want to make a film that excludes them,
and maybe we don't need to."

The odds of Fox green-lighting an R-rated movie are slim, at the very least.

 

[danoyse]

I don't have anything against Wolverine. What I have against is the overexposure of the character. Do they really think that just because it's Wolverine it'll do well?

Well, you're complaining about overexposure, but you're the one who brought up the Wolverine movie in a thread that was started with a James Marsden interview, which now appears to have taken over the conversation.

 

[Obsidian]

Well, you're complaining about overexposure, but you're the one who brought up the Wolverine movie in a thread that was started with a James Marsden interview, which now appears to have taken over the conversation.

Technically, he wasn't really off topic because the "Wolverine" solo film was mentioned in the interview. He's just addressing one part of that interview.

 

[Deep Thinkin'!]

Truth be told, if you really want to tell Wolverine's story, you're going to have to make the movie pretty heavy at times. But can you make that PG-13?

Of course you can make it PG-13! Of course Wolverine has a heavy story! You can make things pretty gosh darned heavy at PG-13!

Plus, I know a lot of parents who don't even let they're teens (ages 13-16) see PG-13! What the hell are they thinkin making it R?

Although I know they will most likely not make it R, I'd say if they did, they'd be the most dumb people I've ever heard of!