Marvel Solicitions for February 2011

Tron Bonne

All Ass, No Sass
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
33,289
Reaction score
1
Points
31
http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=29423

Looks like the whole .1 thing is actually separate issues. A few minis have gone to $2.99, but only a very few. Silver Surfer by Greg Pak should be interesting.

Also looks as if Invincible Iron Man will go up to $3.99 past issue 500, to no one's surprised, I'm sure. And possibly Cap will stay at that price, even without the Nomad back-up...
 
Last edited:
- Oh great, The Hood has the Infinity Gauntlet :dry:

- Oh great, a new Venom :dry:

- Skaar appears to be only half transformed on the cover to iHulks 623. Wonder what's up w/ that.

- In an attempt to boost sales for Avengers Academy and Young Allies, they have their crossover book involve fighting....Arcade? Hahahahaha, pass.

- Wait, is that mother F'ing Hyperion as the new T-Bolt? :awesome:

- Age of X looks pretty interesting

- I liked "Teon" better when he was called "Wildchild" :o

- Looks like X-Factor is next to hop on the vampires bandwagon. Looks like I'll be skipping a few issues.
 
-Looks like Marvel is doing the whole volume thing for SHIELD now. Interesting, I wonder why, since I don't think that was the original plan. I don't remember how well it sold on the charts, so maybe they're taking the Ultimate approach and making it a series of minis instead to make sure a fresh #1 is up constantly. I don't really think that plan works very well, though. Could be that they just want to give Weaver extra time or something (though I would think a bi-monthly schedule already gives plenty of time since he's not doing anything else that I'm aware of).

-The price point on Takio is pretty good. A 100 page GN HC for only $9.95? Great pricing for something aimed at kids. I must admit, I'm kind of interested to see how Bendis handles a kid's book, and for that price, I may check it out

-How long are we going to have to wait for the Moore and Gaiman Marvelman stuff? I mean, we all know that's what the real appeal of that licenses ultimately is.
 
Last edited:
1. Seriously....the $3.99 price point is getting rediculous. Marvel said they weren't going to do $3.99 for #1 issues anymore and yet not even a month in with their so called "price cut" they are already breaking that promise with Iron Man 2.0 #1.

2. I really don't get the point of the .1 issues when Big Time has just recently come out and that's a perfectly good jumping on point and Invincible Iron Man is getting it's 500th issue so that would be a perfectly good jumping on point

3. Still pissed off that Marvel is not going to renumber Deadpool. Though Deadpool & Cable #26 looks awesome. It's nice to see Swierczynski continuing with Nicieza's characterization of Deadpool in Cable & Deadpool as opposed to Daniel Way's Deadpool which flat out ignored any progression the character has made.
 
Is it just me or is marvel completely over obsessing about making books that are "THE PERFECT JUMPING ON POINT!!". Seriously, this whole .1 initiative sounds really stupid to me and i dont think its going to bring the kiddies in like they hope.
 
DC and Marvel should both promote trades when a new movie comes. Nolanw as inspired by The Long Halloween and Year One for example, so they should put those out and promote them. The Wolverine movie is based on the Claremont/Miller mini, so putting that on a nice HC Collector's edition would be good too, instead of hoping to get new monthly readers.
 
While not on the grand scale of DC's January cut-backs, it's still 38 (if I counted correctly) comics at $2.99. That's a HUGE difference in my spending budget, especially considering this last week of comics went $3.99 crazy!

There were 29 $2.99 comics in January, 25 for December, and 24 for November.

In comparison, November has 70 comics at $3.99 (3 @ 4.99 and 3 @ 5.99 and 1 @ 3.50), December has 68 @ $3.99 (2 @ 4.99), January has 55 @ $3.99 (2 @ 4.99 and 1 @ 3.50), and February has 44 @ $3.99 (only 1 comic at 4.99).

Before, we'd steadily get more and more comics at the $3.99 range, and now the trend has reversed itself. That's good to me...and, more importantly, we've gone from 70 $3.99 comics this month to just 44 in February. (A good portion of the $3.99 comics do have 40 pages, also. I wouldn't mind seeing $2.99 for 32 pages and $3.99 for 40.) Even better, we only have one comic in February higher than the $3.99 price tag. (I didn't include specialties, like magazines and poster books.)
 
1. Seriously....the $3.99 price point is getting rediculous. Marvel said they weren't going to do $3.99 for #1 issues anymore and yet not even a month in with their so called "price cut" they are already breaking that promise with Iron Man 2.0 #1.

Issue #1 is a 40-pager. I understand them having to charge more for that comic; but, the next one drops down a buck with the fewer pages.

I don't mind paying more for additional content. Like with Big Time, Dan gave us quite a bit of material in that book...so, I sure didn't mind one bit. "Just give me what I pay for," is my motto. (Oh, and it's nice if it's good, too.)
 
Can The Hood and the ****ing Infinity Gauntlet go away already? Seriously.
 
Issue #1 is a 40-pager. I understand them having to charge more for that comic; but, the next one drops down a buck with the fewer pages.

I don't mind paying more for additional content. Like with Big Time, Dan gave us quite a bit of material in that book...so, I sure didn't mind one bit. "Just give me what I pay for," is my motto. (Oh, and it's nice if it's good, too.)

Oh, I didn't notice the extra content. I'm fine with the $3.99 price point when they give you more for it.
 
My thoughts on :hrt:February:hrt::

I really can't stand the Ultimate line but I'm having trouble resisting Ult Cap by Aaron and Garney......must......fight.....the........urge.........:cmad:

Avengers is becoming quite the crap-fest isn't it? The return no one was demanding....The Hood. God forbid if Bendis uses somebody in (now) in limbo that has a history with the Gauntlet like [BLACKOUT]Thanos[/BLACKOUT] Can we get someone else on this book please?????? Say it with me - Abnett and Lanning.

That must be one of the worst solits ever for New Avengers #9. It seems like something suited better for Secret Avengers than a street level team.

Cap #615 - RIP Bucky Cap......:csad:

Those previews for ASM are concerning me a bit. The words "reprecussions" and "dramatic change" bother me because they haven't worked well for the webslinger in the past 15 years.

Hyperion on the T-Bolts? Didn't see that one coming.....

Christ, if I had a nickel for everytime Wolverine's been brainwashed I'd be able to buy the Yankees.:doh:

And finally PUNISHERMAX - HOORAY!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
PUNISHERMAX LIVES!! Awesome news.

Agreed with Tron about Marvelman. I've managed to buy most of the original Eclipse run over the last few years. I love it. But i'm missing 8 issues. At the rate Marvel is going with this(and at the price. 35 bucks for a 250 page newsprint B&W hardcover!?), I can buy those last 8 issues I need before they even consider finally printing the Moore/Gaiman stuff and still save a boatload of money. However, I AM curious as to how they're handling it. Of course, they have to go back through all the issues and digitally alter the text to "Marvelman" if they decide to do so. And then, if I'm not mistaken, Todd McFarland only owns copyright to the certain Miracleman MM logo, so they'd have to go back and digitally alter it to the one that we see in Marvel's promotions, and that seems tedious. But who knows?
 
Haven't had the time to comment until now. But I have some time to get in a few comments/ravings.

- Every quarter needs a focus for the variant covers, which boost sales for some books modestly, or at the very least modestly stifle the monthly drops many series have. In this case, it will be a FF 50th anniversary motif. At least that's better than "Wolverine Art Appreciation" or the least successful variant cover scheme, "Marvel Super Hero Squad". Sales figures seem to show that the reason why some variants and some new #1's or 3 digit renumberings see a sales spike for that one month and never again is they're being bought almost exclusively by the hardcore fan who collects that sort of thing, and are not attracting anyone new to try the book. That's disturbing in the long term.

- So, now Ultimate Reed is a villain now? SO glad I am not bothering with that crapola anymore.

- My friend who went to Wizard World Austin claimed that AVENGERS ACADEMY #9 would be Mike McKone's last due to what he said at the con, but he doesn't do the interiors for that; just the cover (as he has for every issue he has or hasn't drawn). Maybe McKone meant that issue nine would be his last cover, as well? Or he would leave after his 9th drawn issue? At any rate, focus shifts back to Finesse and has her meet Taskmaster. This is interesting because Gage has a lot of affection for him; in many issues of AVENGERS: THE INITIATIVE; during DARK REIGN and SIEGE, he was practically the star. Only after TASKMASTER #3, we have his origin now and know he's definitely not a mutant (or an "almost mutant" like Bullseye and Echo are). It should be interesting. By then TASKMASTER will be over, so it looks like Marvel has definitely been trying to keep him in print somewhere lately. Given his mind, though, Taskmaster easily could have had a kid somewhere and just forgotten. It also looks like Ron Garney won't stay long and Sean Chen will be in. While ACADEMY has always seemed to get rock solid art, if McKone is unable to remain as THE regular artist, it will be a shame that the series can't seem to hand onto one.

- The Hood and the Infinity Gauntlet in AVENGERS, ugh. Look, Venom was hot **** in the 90's, but at least even he never went after that. If any books were to aid in selling others with a cut in price, it would be the top Avengers books. It might free up some wallets to try lessor titles. Call it trickle down economics.

- Mike Deodato will apparently pencil two books within a month, SECRET AVENGERS #10 as well as NEW AVENGERS #9 (where he is helped by Howard Chaykin). Or is one the Sr. Deodato and one is the Jr.? Like the Kuberts or Romitas? At any rate, SECRET AVENGERS #10 is the one I care about, and hopefully the arc is good enough to keep me around. It may get more leeway out of me than THOR, but not much more, for $3.99.

- The glut of Wolverine/Deadpool/Captain America/Thor/Iron Man titles continue, although at least one Deadpool book is now retroactively a mini, so there is some sign of tucking back. One of Thor's titles has also be canceled; ironically, the one that was actually good.

- David Gabriel promised that no new #1 for an ongoing title would be $3.99 in 2011, and he's lived up to that. One way is IRON MAN 2.0 is a 3 issue mini to promote War Machine's relaunch, and as a mini it will still be $3.99. Jeez, Marvel are shifter than the Devil when it comes to details about policy.

- CAPTAIN AMERICA #615 promises "nothing will ever be the same again", and I groan every time I see that in a solicit. But with Brubaker on this title, where he has mostly been left alone, that could very much be true. I do wonder if this may be the start of getting the mantle back to Rogers.

- The .1 initiative starts, and the end result is that INVINCIBLE IRON MAN fans will have a $4 issue #501 to buy, AND a $3 issue 500.1 to buy. That means getting $6 out of that fan base in one month, under the premise of trying to bring in newcomers. Ah, Marvel, you shifty minx. I swear, not even the most crafty drug kingpin is better able to figure out how to suck more money out of a dwindling number of hardcore addicts than Marvel editorial can.

- IRON MAN LEGACY #11 is the end of the second arc, and while I probably have enjoyed this more than the main title for a while, sales are so low that I will be astonished if it is solicited in March 2011 for anything other than a one-shot story so it can be capped at the full year marker.

- I can't guarantee I will still be around THOR for issue #620. I just hopped onto ASM and at this point, it looks like a trade in the budget is due. Dan Slott is often far better with pace and story per page than Fraction is.

- Looks like ASM #655 is a one shot story to showcase Marcos Martin's artwork, while issue #656 is the one that really counts for storyline. Feb. 2011 will likely be after the first BIG TIME arc, so we'll see if I am still around. I liked the debut issue, but ASM these days likely has short slack from me, even with Dan Slott the lone master of it's destiny (aside for editorial, who always throw in monkey wrenches). At any rate, it looks like Mac Gargan's days as Venom are gone, and thank heaven for that. Now I just wonder how long Eddie Brock's tenure as "Anti-Venom" lasts. $654.1, again, looks to be an exercise in mooching an extra issue from the fanbase, although to be fair, ASM shipped three issues a month for two years, so it isn't as nasty a move.

- Looks like SPIDER-GIRL #4 picks up where the end of THE GAUNTLET left off. In terms of her character, it makes sense. In terms of me, who only knows of the story in SAGA summaries, it may be a disaster, but we'll see if Tobin can pull it off. Plus, why is Clayton Henry taking a one issue break just to draw MARVEL SUPERHEROES #11, which sells so low people don't even buy it to burn it for heat in 3rd world countries?

- At the very least, some of those 54 trillion stock Iron Man covers that I have seen done for the past four years can be recycled for stuff like IRON MAN MAGAZINE.

- ARCADE: DEATH GAME look awesome for an editorial near cluster ****. It was intended to be a story told in three annuals; AVENGERS ACADEMY, SPIDER-GIRL, and YOUNG ALLIES. Only, WHOOPS, YOUNG ALLIES was canceled so fast, Marvel solicited an issue it'll never publish (which, to be fair, they haven't done very often since about 2002). Plus, maybe someone told someone that releasing an "annual" for SPIDER-GIRL when it hasn't even lasted a full quarter of a year made even less sense than WOLVERINE #1000. Thus, it is re-solicited as a 3 issue mini series, two of which ship this month. It looks great, frankly. Young Allies and Avengers Academy teaming up to battle Arcade, and just to meet. Plus, David Baldeon, from YOUNG ALLIES, will pencil it. In a way, I am looking forward to this more than ONSLAUGHT UNLEASHED, which is written by the actual YOUNG ALLIES writer.

- The Marvel strategy for Daredevil; have Black Panther take over his book, because Black Panther cannot support his own title, in a "stealth take over" much as with INCREDIBLE HERCULES and DARK WOLVERINE. Now, it took INCREDIBLE HULK readers at least a year or so before they figured out the switch wasn't just a gimmick, and to (sadly) leave. It took even less time for WOLVERINE's readers to figure out that they didn't want to pay for Daken. How long will it take DAREDEVIL's readers to ditch T'Challa? Meanwhile, the actual Matt Murdock is being reborn in, well, DAREDEVIL REBORN. When Marvel did this trick with Herc, they got a modest seller for about 2 years before the increase in price helped the sales fall down the chute. When they did it with Wolverine, they accomplished the incredible feat of having what was once Marvel's top character sell at his lowest levels in about 15-20 years. Now they attempt the trick with Black Panther and Daredevil, both C and B list franchises (respectively). If anyone cannot predict how badly this is going to go for both DD and T'Challa in terms of sales, then your lack of common sense, intelligence, reality, and history is so low that you have the perfect stuff to work for Marvel editorial. Betting on BLACK PANTHER: MWOF #515 whatever to dive below DD's normal sales before long and DARDEVIL REBORN to NOT sell as well as DD did is fairly easy. What Marvel has done with DD is create a "jumping off point". DD's readers will leap off it after SHADOWLAND, and not return...ever. Maybe 2/3rds of them will read REBORN, and I doubt they will give T'Challa much chance. I could be wrong, but recent history favors me being right. While comic companies struggle to create "jumping on points" that actually work, they seem adept at creating the opposite.

- HEROES FOR HIRE looks cool, but given how low most of the SHADOWLAND mini's sold, I do wonder how long it will last. It also looks like Iron Fist ISN'T the one doing the hiring. Interesting.

- HAWYEKE: BLIND SPOT is a mini that basically replaces HAWKEYE & MOCKINGBIRD, as Jim McCan is aboard.

- FANTASTIC FOUR #588 is the issue after their death of a member, and as it technically is not a new launch, it is $3.99 for no damn reason. I still have my doubts about the death lasting all year, since the FF will turn 50 in 2011. I honestly don't want any of them to die, although they've been around so long that it is the only story that gets attention, and sales have spiked since THREE started, so it isn't like Marvel was wrong in their choice here. That is a great Alan Davis cover.

- I am SO glad POWER MAN & IRON FIST was planned before sales for SHADOWLAND: POWER MAN were known, because there was NO way Marvel would have planned another five issues if they knew those sales. But that's a good thing for Iron Fist fans, as Fred Ven Lante will have another five issues with him. Hey, if Marvel had instead launched it as an ongoing series months ago, it would have been lucky to last ten issues.

- ONSLAUGHT UNLEASHED is a mini in which, it seems, the Young Allies and Secret Avengers team up to fight Onslaught, who has come from the same universe as Rikki Barnes/Nomad came. In a way it makes sense; Nomad came from the HEROES REBORN universe of Counter-Earth that was made possible after Franklin Richards wanted to save all the heroes who "died" to stop Onslaught, which meant Onslaught was still there, as they'd basically all jumped into his energy to make it stable enough for the X-Men to blow up with a tag team attack (seriously, that is what happened). I just am in no mood to see Onslaught again, and Filip Andrade's art is okay for a back up strip I am paying for anyway, but part of me hesitates to buy it for $4 a pop on it's own. Much like Humberto Ramos, who drew the cover, he may excel at characters who don't need human proportion, like Onslaught. And at the very least, Onslaught is a worthier threat for the Secret Avengers than kung-fu dragons and ninja.

- THUNDERBOLTS has a crossover/tie in with another title? What next? Joe Quesada refuses to answer a direct question?

- Greg Pak launches a SILVER SURFER mini, which if memory serves is his first since ANNIHILATION in 2006. I am partisan about trying it. While Marvel won't launch new ongoings at $3.99, they have no qualms about spitting out 14,000 mini's at that price.

- Here is an example of Marvel editorial being stark raving mad. They go on their scheme to add triple digits to all their titles to relaunch them and claim history, etc. Then they launch DEADPOOL TEAM-UP at #900 to let us know they know how insane that is, and count backwards. Haha, funny. But then they release WOLVERINE #900, and it is dead straight. Now, we get WOLVERINE #1000, probably because WOLVERINE #900 didn't tank. That is something that WHAT THE--!? might have mocked in the 90's. Now Marvel is beyond satire.

- NAMOR: THE FIRST MUTANT #7 has been solicited, but sales stink. Who knows how long it will last.

- TAKIO, which is an all-ages offering by Bendis and Oeming, is being sold as a 96 page HC at $10. Now, based on the great sales of SUPERMAN: EARTH ONE, this looks like even more of a good deal. But it's being packaged to sell to an all ages, new kid audience. Obviously, Marvel understands that offering a high page count for a low price is a great way to attract kids, or their parents, or new fans in general. This is literally proof. So why, I ask, can they not figure this out and broaden the approach for their entire line? Why can't DC? Why can't ANYONE!? This proves that it isn't that people who run the big two comics don't know how to try to sell to newer audiences or to cut a break to bring in a crowd. They know. They're just too stupid, incompetent, or downright greedy to extend the policy. Marvel would rather sell 50 people a $5 comic than 100 people a $2.50 comic. And that's fine, for short sighted aims. Just don't believe it when someone from DC or Marvel brass gives an interview and sounds like a kid being electrocuted trying to figure out why comics can't grow their audience. They know exactly what strategy to try. They just aren't willing to try it when it counts, with what it would count with.
 
Last edited:
- I can't guarantee I will still be around THOR for issue #620. I just hopped onto ASM and at this point, it looks like a trade in the budget is due. Dan Slott is often far better with pace and story per page than Fraction is.

:(

And with that, the slow motion invasion of reality began
 
:(

And with that, the slow motion invasion of reality began

If it eases you, my patience/tolerance for ASM after so many bad memories is not terribly high, even with Dan Slott on it (who I usually enjoy as a writer). :dry:
 
That was suppose to be your Casanova money, Dread. Casanova :(
 
If it eases you, my patience/tolerance for ASM after so many bad memories is not terribly high, even with Dan Slott on it (who I usually enjoy as a writer). :dry:
So you'll only continue to buy it for like half a year when you start to feel disgusted with it instead of a full year or two?
 
That was suppose to be your Casanova money, Dread. Casanova :(

CASANOVA I would have to catch up with in trade, or buying reprints, or buying the trade of the reprints. :p

So you'll only continue to buy it for like half a year when you start to feel disgusted with it instead of a full year or two?

No. THOR isn't getting another year, unless Fraction & Ferry crank it up. I wouldn't devote 12 months unquestioned to ASM after all the editorial moves. Which has nothing to do with Slott, but just saying.

Besides, should I lie and say that the debut of BIG TIME wasn't more enjoyable for me than about 1-2 out of the three last issues of THOR?

It was easier to stay on a title before the price jumps. INVINCIBLE IRON MAN is climbing there, and y'know what? That's a good jumping off point for that, too.
 
So let me get this straight....

Marvel does the .1 thing (that's point one, not one cent God forbid) to try and get new readers into ongoing titles. However to the best of what I've seen so far it's only the $4 ongoing titles? No help to the struggling mid-low range titles, promote the already selling high priced items. And not only push just those, but let's make the .1 issue an inbetween issue so instead of paying $4 for that title that month, you're paying $7?! Yeah, thanks for that extra issue robbing an extra $3 out of my pocket. That's a great way to get people ON to your already overpriced titles :rolleyes:

Am I understanding this right because frankly, this just sounds stupid.
 
I dont understand how the ".1" is supposed to be a signal to new readers to jump in. I feel like anyone with half a brain would just be confused at looking at this. Marvel's tripping all over themselves to attract new readers by using these strange new marketing strategies while avoiding the REAL reason why kids aren't reading books (price and limited distribution).
 
I don't really see it as all that confusing honestly. .1 equals good jumping on point, then you go to the next issue. I mean it won't work like that for the most part and is also there to milk people already reading the book, sure, but it's not that difficult to really understand how it works.
 
So is everyone ready for Doom to kill Hood?


:doom: :doom: :doom:

Yeah, they really did hype him up when he came back from nowhere, but he in no way lived up to it, and I'd rather he just go back to whereever they found him.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"